<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Perkins, Lora</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">From the Editor</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Native Plants Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025-11-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-1</style></pages><doi><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.3368/npj.26.1.1</style></doi><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">26</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">One of the pleasures of editing Native Plants Journal is seeing the incredible variety of ways to understand and improve outcomes for native plant restoration, conservation, and stewardship. Our authors and readers bring many perspectives, and their work reflects a wide range of questions, goals, and approaches. Among the recurring challenges in this field is how we strike a balance between going deep and going broad. Both approaches offer distinct and necessary contributions to the science and practice of native plant work.Some studies focus on …</style></abstract></record></records></xml>