The Willamette Valley Seed Increase Program

References

1. 1. Alverson E.

   2006. Taxonomy and variation of some Willamette Valley prairie plants: a plant taxonomist’s perspective on seed collection. Corvallis (OR): Native Seed Network Genetics Workshop, March, 2006. URL: http://www.nativeseednetwork.org/article_view?id=33 (accessed 15 Aug 2008).
2. 1. Bradshaw AD.

   1987. The reclamation of derelict land and the ecology of ecosystems. In: Jordan WR III., Gilpin ME, Aber JE, editors. Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p 53–83.
3. 1. Burton PJ,
   2. Burton CM.

   2002. Promoting genetic diversity in the production of large quantities of native plant seed. Ecological Restoration 20:117–123.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
4. 1. Chambers K.

   1998. Beware the hybrid gum-plant! Oregon Flora Newsletter 4(2):9–10. URL: http://www.oregonflora.org/ofn/OFNv4n2.pdf.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. City of Eugene.

   2008. West Eugene Wetlands Program. URL: http://www.eugene-or.gov (accessed 15 Aug 2008).
6. 1. Ehrenfeld J.

   2001. Defining the limits of restoration: the need for realistic goals. Restoration Ecology 8: 2–9.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Ellstrand NC,
   2. Elam DR.

   1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217–242.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Erickson VJ,
   2. Mandel NL,
   3. Sorenson FC.

   2004. Landscape patterns of phenotypic variation and population structuring in a selfing grass, Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye). Canadian Journal of Botany 82:1776–1789.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
9. 1. Falk DA.

   1991. Joining biological and economic models for conserving plant genetic diversity. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. p 209–224.
10. 1. Falk DA,
    2. Richards CM,
    3. Montalvo AM,
    4. Knapp EE.

    2006. Population and ecological genetics in restoration ecology. In: Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB, editors. Foundations of restoration ecology: the science and practice of ecological restoration. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 14–41.
11. 1. Floberg J,
    2. Goering M,
    3. Wilhere G

    , and 16 others. 2004. Willamette Valley–Puget Trough–Georgia Basin ecoregional assessment, volume one: Report. Prepared by The Nature Conservancy with support from the Nature Conservancy of Canada, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Natural Resources (Natural Heritage and Nearshore Habitat programs), Oregon State Natural Heritage Information Center and the British Columbia Conservation Data Centre.
12. 1. Gisler SD.

    2003. Reproductive isolation and interspecific hybridization in the threatened species, Sidalcea nelsoniana [MSc thesis]. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University. 173 p.
13. 1. Gisler SD.

    2004. Developing biogeographically based population introduction protocols for at-risk Willamette Valley plant species. Report to US Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. Salem (OR): Native Plant Conservation Program, Oregon Department of Agriculture.
14. 1. Gisler S.

    2007. Personal communication. Salem (OR): Oregon Department of Transportation. Biologist.
15. 1. Guerrant EO Jr.,
    2. Fiedler PL,
    3. Havens K,
    4. Maunder M.

    2004. Revised genetic sampling guidelines for conservation collections of rare and endangered plants. In: Guerrant EO Jr., Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 419–441.
16. 1. Gustafson DJ,
    2. Gibson DJ,
    3. Nickrent DL.

    2005. Using local seeds in prairie restoration—data support the paradigm. Native Plants Journal 6:25–28.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Habeck JR.

    1961. The original vegetation of the mid-Willamette Valley, Oregon. Northwest Science 35:65–77.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Havens K.

    1998. The genetics of plant restoration, an overview and a surprise. Restoration and Management Notes 16:68–72.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Hitchcock CL,
    2. Cronquist A.

    1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest: an illustrated manual. Seattle (WA): University of Washington Press. 733 p.
20. 1. Howe HF.

    1994. Managing species diversity in tallgrass prairie: assumptions and implications. Conservation Biology 8:691–704.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Hufford KM,
    2. Mazer SJ.

    2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Johannessen CL,
    2. Davenport WA,
    3. Millet A,
    4. McWilliams S.

    1971. The vegetation of the Willamette Valley. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 61:286–302.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Johnson GR.

    2008. Personal communication. Corvallis (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Geneticist.
24. 1. Johnson GR,
    2. Sorenson FC,
    3. St Clair JB,
    4. Cronn RC.

    2004. Pacific Northwest forest tree seed zones: a template for native plants? Native Plants Journal 5:131–140.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 1. Jones TA.

    2005. Genetic principles and the use of native seed: just the FAQs please, just the FAQs. Native Plants Journal 6:14–24.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 1. Keller LF,
    2. Waller DM.

    2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:230–241.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Knapp EE,
    2. Rice KJ.

    1994. Starting from seed: genetic issues in using native grasses for restoration. Restoration and Management Notes 12:40–45.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Lambert JK.

    2008. Willamette Valley prairie restoration: the Native Seed Network and Sidalcea [MPS thesis]. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University. 85 p.
29. 1. Lesica P,
    2. Allendorf FW.

    1999. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: Mix or match? Restoration Ecology 7:42–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Liston AI.

    2006. Personal communication. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology. Professor.
31. 1. MacKay J.

    1993. Seed source selection and genetic improvement of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Quebec. Annals of Forest Science 50 (Suppl 1): 420s–424s.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. McKay JK,
    2. Christian CE,
    3. Harrison S,
    4. Rice KJ.

    2005. “How local is local?” A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:432–440.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Menges ES,
    2. Guerrant EO Jr.,
    3. Hamze S.

    2004. Effects of seed collection on the extinction risk of perennial plants. In: Guerrant EO Jr., Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 305–324.
34. 1. Meninger HL,
    2. Palmer MA.

    2006. Restoring ecological communities: from theory to practice. In: Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB, editors. Foundations of restoration ecology: the science and practice of ecological restoration. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 88–112.
35. 1. Moritz C.

    1999. Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 130:217–228.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Native Seed Network.

    2006. Genetics workshop seed transfer strategy recommendations. URL: http://www.nativeseednetwork.org/article_view?id=33 (accessed 15 Aug 2008). Corvallis (OR): Institute for Applied Ecology, Native Seed Network.
37. 1. Newman D,
    2. Pilson D.

    1997. Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella. Evolution 51:354–362.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Newman D,
    2. Tallmon DA.

    2001. Experimental evidence for beneficial fitness effects of gene flow in recently isolated populations. Conservation Biology 15:1054–1063.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Noss RF,
    2. LaRoe ET III.,
    3. Scott JM.

    1995. Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. National Biological Service, Biological Report 28.
40. 1. Omernik JM.

    1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118–125.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
41. 1. [OSCS] Oregon Seed Certification Service.

    2007. Oregon Seed Certification Service Handbook. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University Extension Service. 45 p.
42. 1. Palmer MA,
    2. Ambrose RF,
    3. Poff NL.

    1997. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5:291–300.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. PRISM.

    2008. URL: http://www.prismclimate.org (accessed 30 Jan 2008). Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University.
44. 1. Rogers DL.

    2004. Genetic erosion: no longer just an agricultural issue. Native Plants Journal 5:113–122.

    OpenUrl
45. 1. Rogers DL,
    2. Montalvo AM.

    2004. Genetically appropriate choices for plant materials to maintain biological diversity. Berkeley (CA): University of California. Report to the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Lakewood, CO. Available at URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/publications/botany/plantgenetics.pdf (accessed 15 Aug 2008).
46. 1. Severns P,
    2. Villegas S.

    2005. Butterflies hanging on to existence in the Willamette Valley: a relict population of the great copper (Lycaena xanthoides Boisduval). Northwest Science 79:77–80.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Severns P,
    2. Boldt L,
    3. Villegas S.

    2006. Conserving a wetland butterfly: quantifying early lifestage survival through seasonal flooding, adult nectar, and habitat preference. Journal of Insect Conservation 10:361–370.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Sinclair M,
    2. Alverson E,
    3. Dunn P,
    4. Dunwiddie P,
    5. Gray E.

    2006. Bunchgrass prairies. In: Apostol D, Sinclair M, editors. Restoring the Pacific Northwest: the art and science of ecological restoration in Cascadia. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 29–62.
49. 1. Smith S.

    2008. Personal communication. Corvallis (OR): US Fish and Wildlife Service, Finley National Wildlife Refuge. Partners for Fish and Wildlife Private Lands Biologist.
50. 1. Smith SL,
    2. Sher AA,
    3. Grant TA III..

    2007. Genetic diversity in restoration materials and the impacts of seed collection in Colorado’s restoration plant production industry. Restoration Ecology 15:369–374.

    OpenUrl
51. 1. St Clair JB,
    2. Mandel NL,
    3. Vance-Borland KW.

    2005. Genecology of Douglas-fir in Western Oregon and Washington. Annals of Botany 96:1199–1214.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
52. 1. Tyrl RJ.

    1975. Origin and distribution of polyploid Achillea (Compositae) in western North America. Brittonia 27:187–196.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.

    2008. The PLANTS Database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 24 Jan 2008). Baton Rouge (LA): National Plant Data Center.
54. 1. Vergeer P,
    2. Sonderen E,
    3. Ouborg NJ.

    2004. Introduction strategies put to the test: local adaptation versus heterosis. Conservation Biology 18:812–821.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. 1. Wilson BL,
    2. Darris DC,
    3. Fiegener R,
    4. Johnson GR,
    5. Hornin ME,
    6. Kuykendall K.

    2008. Establishing seed transfer zones for Festuca roemeri var. roemeri (Poaceae); results of a common-garden study. Native Plants Journal 9(3):287–302.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
56. 1. Wilson MV.

    1998. Wetland prairie. In: Part I the US Fish and Wildlife Service Willamette Basin Recovery Plan. Portland (OR): US Fish and Wildlife Service. Order No. 13420-6-0287 (2). 23 p.
57. 1. Withrow-Robinson B,
    2. Johnson R.

    2006. Selecting native plant materials for restoration projects: ensuring local adaptation and maintaining genetic diversity. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University Extension Service. Publication EM 8885-E.