Antelope bitterbrush reestablishment

REFERENCES

1. 1. Bainbridge DA,
   2. Virginia RA.

   1990. Restoration in the Sonoran desert of California. Restoration & Management Notes 8:3–14.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Brown ER,
   2. Martinsen CF.

   1959. Browse planting for big game. Olympia (WA): Washington State Game Department. Biological Bulletin 12.
3. 1. Cassidy J.

   1997. Personal communication. Chemult (OR): USDA Forest Service, Fremont–Winema National Forest, Chemult Ranger District. Soil Scientist (deceased).
4. 1. Clements CD,
   2. Young JA.

   2000. Antelope bitterbrush seedling transplant survival. Rangelands 22:15–17.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Dealy JE.

   1970. Survival and growth of bitterbrush on the Silver Lake deer winter range in central Oregon. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Note PNW-133.
6. 1. Duryea ML

   , editor. 1985. Proceedings, evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive abilities of major tests; workshop, 1984 Oct 16–18; Corvallis, OR. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University, Forest Research Laboratory.
7. 1. Guenther GE,
   2. Wambolt CL,
   3. Frisina MR.

   1993. Characteristics of bitterbrush habitats that influence canopy cover and mule deer browsing. Journal of Environmental Management 36:175–181.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. [ITIS] Integrated Taxonomic Information System.

   2004. Biological names database. URL: http://www.itis.usda.gov (accessed 2 November 2005).
9. 1. Kufeld RC.

   1973. Foods eaten by the Rocky Mountain elk. Journal of Range Management 26:106–113.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Kufeld RC,
    2. Wallmo OC,
    3. Feddema C.

    1973. Foods of the Rocky Mountain mule deer. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Paper RM-111.
11. 1. Long AJ,
    2. Carrier BD.

    1993. Effects of Douglas-fir 2+0 seedling morphology on field performance. New Forests 7:19–32.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Longland WS,
    2. Bateman SL.

    2002. Viewpoint: the ecological value of shrub islands on disturbed sagebrush rangelands. Journal of Range Management 55:571–575.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Nord EC.

    1965. Autoecology of bitterbrush in California. Ecological Monographs 35:307–334.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Olson DS.

    1930. Growing trees for forest planting in Montana and Idaho. Washington (DC): USDA. Circular No. 120. 92 p.
15. 1. Randall W,
    2. Johnson GR.

    1998. The impact of environment and nursery on survival and early growth of Douglas-fir, Noble fir, and white pine—a case study. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 13:137–143.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Ritchie GA.

    1984. Assessing seedling quality. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD, editors. Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. The Hague (Netherlands): Martinus Nijoff/Dr W Junk Publishers, for Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis. 386 p.
17. 1. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc.

    1990. SAS/STAT user’s guide, Version 6, 4th edition. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
18. 1. Sexton TO.

    1998. Ecological effects of post-wildfire management activities (salvage-logging and grass-seeding) on vegetation composition, diversity, biomass and growth and survival of Pinus ponderosa and Purshia tridentata [MSc thesis]. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University.
19. 1. Sluder ER.

    1979. The effects of seed and seedling size on survival and growth of loblolly pine. Tree Planters’ Notes 30(4):25–28.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. South DB,
    2. Mitchell RJ.

    1999. Determining the “optimum” slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetation management on a flatwoods site in Georgia, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29:1039–1046.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Stuth JW,
    2. Winward AH.

    1977. Livestock–deer relations in the lodgepole pine-pumice region of central Oregon. Journal of Range Management 30:110–116.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Tiedemann AR,
    2. Klock GO,
    3. Mason LL,
    4. Dears DE.

    1976. Shrub plantings for erosion control in eastern Washington—progress and research needs. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Note PNW-279.
23. 1. USDA Forest Service.

    1992. Lone Pine fire recovery environmental assessment. Klamath Falls (OR): Winema National Forest.
24. 1. Volland L.

    1985. Plant associations of the central Oregon pumice zone. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Region. R-6 ECOL-104-1985. 138 p.