Frozen-Stored Conifer Container Stock can be Outplanted without Thawing

REFERENCES

1. 1. Anonymous.

   1993. EARS-PPM Manual. Delft (The Netherlands): Ingenieursbureau vor Environmental Analysis and Remote Sensing. 34 p.
2. 1. Binder WD,
   2. Fielder P,
   3. Mohammed GH,
   4. L’Hirondelle SJ.

   1997. Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence for stock quality assessment with different types of fluorometers. New Forests 13:63–89.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Burdett AN.

   1979. New methods for measuring root growth capacity: their value in assessing lodgepole pine stock. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 9:63–67.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Camm EL,
   2. Guy RD,
   3. Kubien DS,
   4. Goetze DC,
   5. Silim SN,
   6. Burton PJ.

   1995. Physiological recovery of freezer-stored white and Engelmann spruce seedlings planted following different thawing regimes. New Forests 10:55–77.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Campbell DB,
   2. Jones MD,
   3. Kiiskila S,
   4. Bulmer C.

   2003. Two-year field performance of lodgepole pine seedlings: effects of container type, mycorrhizal fungal inoculants, and site preparation. British Columbia Journal of Ecosystems and Management. URL: http://www.forrex.org/jem/2003/vol3/no2/art2.pdf (accessed 21 Feb 2005).
6. 1. Fløistad IS,
   2. Kohmann K.

   2001. Effects of thawing procedure on frost hardiness, carbohydrate content and timing of bud break in Picea abies. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 16:30–36.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Grossnickle SC,
   2. Folk RS.

   2003. Spring versus summer spruce stocktypes of western Canada: nursery development and field performance. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 18:267–275.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Helenius P,
   2. Luoranen J,
   3. Rikala R.

   2004. Effect of thawing duration and temperature on field performance of frozen-stored Norway spruce container seedlings. Silva Fennica 38:347–352.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Helenius P.

   2005. Effect of thawing regime on growth and mortality of frozen-stored Norway spruce container seedlings planted in cold and warm soil. New Forests 29:33–41.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Jones MD,
    2. Kiiskila S,
    3. Flanagan A.

    2002. Field performance of pine stock types: two-year results of a trial on interior lodgepole pine seedlings grown in Styroblocks™, Copperblocks™, or AirBlocks™. British Columbia Journal of Ecosystems and Management. URL: http://www.forrex.org/jem/2002/vol2/no1/art5.pdf (accessed 21 Feb 2005).
11. 1. Kooistra CM,
    2. Bakker JD.

    2002. Planting frozen conifer seedlings: warming trends and effects on seedling performance. New Forests 23:225–237.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Kozlowski TT,
    2. Pallardy SG.

    2002. Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses. Botanical Review 68:270–334.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Maki DS,
    2. Colombo SJ.

    2001. Early detection of the effects of warm storage on conifer seedlings using physiological tests. Forest Ecology and Management 154:237–249.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. McKay HM.

    1997. A review of the effect of stresses between lifting and planting on nursery stock quality and performance. New Forests 13:369–399.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. [MoF] Ministry of Forests.

    1998. Provincial seedling stock type selection and ordering guidelines [online]. Victoria (BC): British Columbia Ministry of Forests. 71 p. URL: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/pubs/stocktype/index.htm (accessed 22 Feb 2005).
16. 1. Nippert JB,
    2. Duursma RA,
    3. Marshall JD.

    2004. Seasonal variation in photosynthetic capacity of montane conifers. Functional Ecology 18:876–886.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Ritchie GA.

    1982. Carbohydrate reserves and root growth potential in Douglas-fir seedlings before and after cold storage. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 12:905–912.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Ritchie G,
    2. Landis TD.

    2005. Seedling quality tests: chlorophyll fluorescence. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Forest Nursery Notes R6-CP-TP-11-04.
19. 1. Rose R,
    2. Haase DL.

    1997. Thawing regimes for freezer-stored container stock. Tree Planters’ Notes 48:12–17.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Rose R,
    2. Haase D.

    2002. Chlorophyll fluorescence and variations in tissue cold hardiness in response to freezing stress in Douglas-fir seedlings. New Forests 23:81–96.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Schaberg PG,
    2. Shane JB,
    3. Hawley GJ,
    4. Strimbeck GR,
    5. DeHayes DH,
    6. Cali PF,
    7. Donnelly JR.

    1996. Physiological changes in red spruce seedlings during a simulated winter thaw. Tree Physiology 16:567–574.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 1. Silim SN,
    2. Guy RD.

    1998. Influence of thawing duration on performance of conifer seedlings. In: Kooistra CM, technical coordinator. Proceedings of the 1995, 1996, and 1997 annual meetings of the Forest Nursery Association of British Columbia, Canada. Vernon (BC): Forest Nursery Association of British Columbia. p 155–162.
23. 1. Sutherland JR,
    2. Shrimpton GM,
    3. Sturrock RN.

    1989. Diseases and insects in British Columbia forest seedling nurseries. Victoria (BC): British Columbia Ministry of Forests. FRDA Report 065. 85 p.
24. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.

    2004. The PLANTS Database, version 3.5. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 9 Feb 2005). Baton Rouge (LA): National Plant Data Center.
25. 1. Wang Y,
    2. Zwiazek JJ.

    2001. Physiological characteristics and carbohydrate contents of spring-lifted Picea glauca bareroot seedlings following low-temperature storage. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 16:415–421.

    OpenUrl