Genetic principles and the use of native seeds—just the FAQs, please, just the FAQs

References

1. 1. Bailey RG.

   1976. Ecoregions of the United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
2. 1. Bailey RG.

   2001. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/land/ecosysmgmt/ecoreg1_home.html (accessed 27 May 2003). Ft Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service.
3. 1. Barbour MG,
   2. Burk JH,
   3. Pitts WD,
   4. Gilliam FS,
   5. Schwartz MW.

   1999. Terrestrial plant ecology. 3rd edition. Menlo Park (CA):Addison Wesley Longman.
4. 1. Becker H,
   2. McGraw L,
   3. Stelljes KB.

   1998. Why in situ? Finding and protecting wild relatives of American crops.Agricultural Research 46(12):4–8.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Briggs FN,
   2. Knowles PF.

   1967. Introduction to plant breeding. Reinhold Publishing Corp. 426 p.
6. 1. Burton PJ,
   2. Burton CM.

   2002. Promoting genetic diversity in the production of large quantities of native plant seed. Ecological Restoration 20:117–123.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
7. 1. Darwin C.

   1892.The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London, United Kingdom: John Murray.
8. 1. Davis KM,
   2. Englert JM,
   3. Kujawksi JL.

   2002. Improved conservation plant materials released by NRCS and cooperators through September 2002. URL: http://plant-materials.nrcs.usda.gov/ (accessed 1 Aug 2003). Beltsville (MD): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Plant Materials Center.
9. 1. Dewey DR.

   1975.The origin of Agropyron smithii. American Journal of Botany 62:524–530.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Frankel OH.

    1974. Genetic conservation: our evolutionary responsibility. Genetics 78:53–65.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
11. 1. Frankel OH,
    2. Brown AHD,
    3. Burdon JJ.

    1995.The conservation in situ of useful or endangered wild species. In: Frankel OH, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ. The conservation of plant biodiversity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p 118–175.
12. 1. Fryxell PA.

    1957. Mode of reproduction of higher plants.The Botanical Review 23:135–233.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Gregor JW.

    1946. Ecotypic differentiation. New Phytologist 45:254–270.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Hamrick JL,
    2. Godt MJW,
    3. Murawski DA,
    4. Loveless MD.

    1991. Correlations between species traits and allozyme diversity: implications for conservation biology. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. p 75–86.
15. 1. Hargrove WM,
    2. Hoffman FM,
    3. Obeng A,
    4. Debasa R.

    2000. New high-resolution national map series of vegetation ecoregions produced empirically using multivariate spatial clustering. URL: http://research.esd.ornl.gov/~hnw/ecoregions/ecoregions.html (accessed 27 May 2003). Oak Ridge (TN): Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
16. 1. Hufford KM,
    2. Mazer SJ.

    2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Jensen KB,
    2. Zhang YF,
    3. Dewey DR.

    1990. Mode of pollination of perennial species of the Triticeae in relation to genomically defined genera. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 70:215–225.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
18. 1. Johnson GR,
    2. Sorenson FC,
    3. St Clair JB,
    4. Cronn RC.

    2004. Pacific Northwest forest tree seed zones: a template for native plants? Native Plants Journal 5:131–140.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 1. Jones TA.

    2003.The restoration gene pool concept: beyond the native versus non-native debate. Restoration Ecology 11:281–290.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Jones TA,
    2. Nielson DC,
    3. Arredondo JT,
    4. Redinbaugh MG.

    2003. Characterization of diversity of three squirreltail taxa. Journal of Range Management 56:474–482.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Langlet O.

    1959. A cline or not a cline—a question of Scots pine. Sylvae Genetica 8:13–22.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Larson SR,
    2. Cartier E,
    3. McCracken CL,
    4. Dyer D.

    2001. Mode of reproduction and AFLP variation in purple needlegrass (Nassella pulchra): utilization of natural germplasm sources. Molecular Ecology 10:1165–1178.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 1. Larson SR,
    2. Jones TA,
    3. McCracken CL,
    4. Jensen KB.

    2003. Amplified fragment length polymorphism in E. elymoides, E. multisetus, and other Elymus taxa. Canadian Journal of Botany 81:789–805.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Massa AN,
    2. Larson SR,
    3. Jensen KB,
    4. Hole DJ.

    2001.AFLP variation in Bromus section Ceratochloa germplasm of Patagonia. Crop Science 41:1609–1616.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. McKee R,
    2. Hyland HL.

    1941. Apetalous and petaliferous flowers in Lespedeza. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 33:811–815.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Meffe GK,
    2. Carroll CR.

    1997. Genetics: conservation of diversity within species. In: Meffe GK, Carroll CR. Principles of conservation biology. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates Inc. p 161–201.
27. 1. Moll RH,
    2. Salhuana WS,
    3. Robinson HF.

    1962. Heterosis and genetic diversity in variety crosses of maize. Crop Science 2:197–198.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Moll RH,
    2. Lonnquist JH,
    3. Fortuna JV,
    4. Johnson EC.

    1965.The relation of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139–144.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
29. 1. Montalvo AM,
    2. Ellstrand NC.

    2001. Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae).American Journal of Botany 88:258–269.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. 1. Moritz C.

    1999. Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 130:217–228.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Omernik JM.

    1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118–125.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Omernik JM.

    1995. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. In: Davis WS, Simon TP, editors. Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers. p 49–62.
33. 1. Parker WH.

    1992. Focal point seed zones: site-specific seed zone delineation using geographic information systems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22:267–271.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Quinn JA.

    1978. Plant ecotypes: ecological or evolutionary units? Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 105:58–64.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Randall WK.

    1996. Forest tree seed zones for western Oregon. Salem (OR): Oregon Department of Forestry.
36. 1. Randall WK,
    2. Berrang P.

    2002.Washington tree seed transfer zones. Olympia (WA):Washington Department of Natural Resources.
37. 1. Rehfeldt GE.

    1991. Gene resource management: using models of genetic variation in silviculture. In: Proceedings genetics/silviculture workshop. 1990 Aug 27–31;Wenatchee,WA. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service. p 31–44.
38. 1. Robinson HF,
    2. Comstock RE,
    3. Harvey PH.

    1949. Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in corn.Agronomy Journal 41:353–359.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Robinson HF,
    2. Mann TJ,
    3. Comstock RE.

    1954. An analysis of quantitative variability in Nicotiana tabacum. Heredity 8:365–376.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Soltis DE,
    2. Soltis PS.

    1993. Molecular data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 12:243–273.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Stebbins GL. Jr.

    1947. Types of polyploids: their classification and significance. Advances in Genetics 1:403–429.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 1. Stebbins GL. Jr.

    1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York (NY): Columbia University Press. 643 p.
43. 1. Templeton AR.

    1986. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In: Soulé ME, editor. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates Inc. p 105–121.
44. 1. Templeton AR.

    1997. Coadaptation, local adaptation, and outbreeding depression. In: Meffe GK, Carroll CR,and contributors.Principles of conservation biology. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates Inc. p 171–172.
45. 1. Turesson G.

    1922. The species and the variety as ecological units. Hereditas 3:100–113.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
46. 1. [US EPA] US Environmental Protection Agency.

    2002. Level III ecoregions of the conterminous United States. URL: http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/level_iii.htm (accessed 27 May 2003). Corvallis (OR):Western Ecology Division.
47. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.

    2004. The PLANTS database, version 3.5. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 3 Jan 2005). Baton Rouge (LA): National Plant Data Center.
48. 1. [USDA SCS] USDA Soil Conservation Service.

    1981. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States.Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office.Agriculture Handbook 296.
49. 1. Wark DB,
    2. Poole WR,
    3. Arnott RG,
    4. Moats LR,
    5. Wetter L.

    1995. Revegetating with native grasses. Stonewall (MB): Ducks Unlimited Canada. 133 p.
50. 1. Waser NM,
    2. Price MV.

    1985. Reciprocal transplant experiments with Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): evidence for local adaptation. American Journal of Botany 72:1726–1732.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. 1. Waser NM,
    2. Price MV.

    1989. Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43:1097–1109.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science