Pacific Northwest Forest Tree Seed Zones

References

1. 1. Aagaard JE,
   2. Vollmer SS,
   3. Sorensen FC,
   4. Strauss SH.

   1995. Mitochondrial DNA products among RAPD profiles are frequent and strongly differentiated between races of Douglas-fir. Molecular Ecology 4:441–447.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 1. Abbott RJ.

   1976. Variation with common groundsel, Senecio vulgaris L. I. Genetic response to spatial variations of the environment. New Phytol-ogist 76:153–164.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Adams WT.

   1992. Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. New Forests 6:217–240.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Hobbs SD,
   2. Helgerson OT

   1. Adams WT,
   2. Campbell RK.

   1981. Genetic adaptation and source specificity. In: Hobbs SD, Helgerson OT, editors. Reforestation of skeletal soils; 1981 Nov 17–19; Medford, Oregon. Corvallis (OR): Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University. p 78–85.
5. 1. Balduman LM,
   2. Aitken SN,
   3. Harmon M,
   4. Adams WT.

   1999. Genetic variation in cold hardiness of Douglas-fir in relation to parent tree environment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29:62–72.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Black-Samuelson S,
   2. Eriksson G,
   3. Gustafsson L,
   4. Gustafsson P.

   1997. RAPD and morphological analysis of the rare plant species Vicia pisiformis (Fabaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61:325–343.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Booth DT,
   2. Jones TA.

   2001. Plants for ecological restoration: a foundation and a philosophy for the future. Native Plants Journal 2:12–20.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 1. Burdon RD,
   2. Low CB.

   1991. Performance of Pinus ponderosa and Pinus jeffreyi provenances in New Zealand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21:1401–1414.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Campbell RK.

   1974a. A provenance-transfer model for boreal regions. Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning 31:544–566.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Campbell RK.

    1974b. Use of phenology for examining provenance transfers in reforestation of Douglas-fir. Journal of Applied Ecology 11:1069–1080.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Campbell RK.

    1979. Genecology of Douglas-fir in a watershed in the Oregon Cascades. Ecology 60:1036–1050.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Campbell RK.

    1987. Biographical distribution limits of Douglas-fir in southwest Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management 18:1–34.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Campbell RK.

    1991. Soils, seed-zone maps, and physiography: guidelines for seed transfer of Douglas-fir in southwestern Oregon. Forest Science 37:973–986.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Campbell RK,
    2. Sugano AI.

    1989. Seed zones and breeding zones for white pine in the Cascade Range of Washington and Oregon. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Research Paper PNW-RP-407.
15. 1. Campbell RK,
    2. Pawuk WA,
    3. Harris AS.

    1989. Microgeographic genetic variation of Sitka spruce in southeastern Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19:1004–1013.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Cunningham RA.

    1975. Provisional tree and shrub zones for the Great Plains. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Paper RM-150.
17. 1. Duffield JW.

    1956. Damage to western Washington forests from November 1955 cold wave. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Note 129.
18. 1. Erickson VJ,
    2. Mandel NL,
    3. Sorensen FC.

    Landscape patterns of phenotypic variation and population structuring in a selfing grass, Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye). Canadian Journal of Botany (forthcoming).
19. 1. Giles BE.

    1984. A comparison between quantitative and biochemical variation in the wild barley Hordeum murinum. Evolution 38:34–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Schonewald-Cox CM,
    2. Chambers SM,
    3. MacBryde B,
    4. Thomas WL

    1. Hamrick JL.

    1984. The distribution of genetic variation within and among natural plant populations. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas WL, editors. Genetics and conservation. Menlo Park (CA): The Benjamin/Cummins Publishing Co Inc.
21. 1. Brown AHD,
    2. Clegg MT,
    3. Kahler AL,
    4. Weir BS

    1. Hamrick JL,
    2. Godt MJW.

    1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS, editors. Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. p 43–63.
22. 1. Hoff RJ.

    1988. Susceptibility of ponderosa pine to the needle cast fungus Lophodermium baculiferum. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Inter-mountain Research Station. Research Paper INT-386.
23. 1. Hufford KM,
    2. Mazer SJ.

    2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Albricht M

    1. Illingworth K,
    2. Szalkai A.

    1993. Summary. In: Albricht M, editor. British Columbia interior tree improvement council second progress report 1985–1990. Victoria (BC): British Columbia Ministry of Forests. 52 p.
25. 1. [ITIS] Integrated Taxonomic Information System.

    2002. Biological names (online database). URL: http://www.itis.usda.gov (accessed 24 Aug 2004).
26. 1. Karhu A,
    2. Hurme P,
    3. Karjalainen M,
    4. Karvonen P,
    5. Kärkkäinen K,
    6. Neale D,
    7. Savolainen O.

    1996. Do molecular markers reflect patterns of differentiation in adaptive traits in conifers? Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93:216–221.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Kitzmiller J,
    2. Hanson L.

    2003. California native grasses genecological studies. Portland (OR): Ecological genetics and native plant material development workshop. 2003 Nov 2–5. URL: ftp://ftp2.fs.fed.us/incoming/r6/ro/native_plants (accessed 24 Aug 2004).
28. 1. Kleinschmit J,
    2. Svolba J,
    3. Rau H-M,
    4. Weisgerber H.

    1996. The IUFRO Abies gran-dis provenance experiment in Germany. Silvae Genetica 45:311–317.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Knapp EE,
    2. Rice KJ.

    1998. Comparison of isozymes and quantitative traits for evaluating patterns of genetic variation in purple needle grass (Nassella pulchra). Conservation Biology 12:1031–1041.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Lagercrantz U,
    2. Ryman N.

    1990. Genetic structure of Norway spruce (Picea abies): concordance of morphological and allozymic variation. Evolution 44:38–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. Langlet O.

    1936. Studier över tallen fysiologiska variabilitet och dess sam-band med klimatet. Ett bitrag till kännedomen om tallens ecotyper. Meddelingen från Statens Skogsförsökanstalt 29:219–420.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Latta RG,
    2. Mitton JB.

    1999. Historical separation and present gene flow through a zone of secondary contact in ponderosa pine. Evolution 53:769–776.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Lesica P,
    2. Allendorf FW.

    1999. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: mix or match? Restoration Ecology 7:42–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Li P,
    2. Adams WT.

    1989. Range-wide patterns of allozyme variation in Dou-glas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19:149–161.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. McKay JK,
    2. Latta RG.

    2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:285–291.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. McKay JK,
    2. Bishop JG,
    3. Lin J-Z,
    4. Richards JH,
    5. Sala A,
    6. Stranger B,
    7. Mitchell-Olds T.

    2001. Local adaptation despite absence of marker diversity in the rare Sapphire Rockcress. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 268:1715–1721.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. McMahon G,
    2. Gregonis SM,
    3. Waltman SW,
    4. Omernik JM,
    5. Thorson TD,
    6. Freeouf JA,
    7. Rorick AH,
    8. Keys JE.

    2001. Developing a spatial framework of common ecological regions for the conterminous US. Environmental Management 28:293–316.

    OpenUrlGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 1. Merkle SA,
    2. Adams WT,
    3. Campbell RK.

    1988. Multivariate analysis of allozyme variation patterns in coastal Douglas-fir from southwest Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18:181–187.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Landis TD

    1. Meyer SE,
    2. Monsen SB.

    1993. Genetic considerations in propagating native shrubs, forbs, and grasses from seed. In: Landis TD, technical coordinator. Proceedings: Western Forest Nursery Association. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report GTR-RM-221. p 47–54.
40. 1. Monserud RA.

    1990. An expert system for determining compatible seed-transfer locations. AI Applications 4:44–50.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Munger TT,
    2. Morris WG.

    1937. Growth of Douglas fir trees of known seed source. Washington (DC): United States Department of Agriculture. Technical Bulletin 537. 40 p.
42. 1. Parker WH.

    1992. Focal point seed zones: site-specific seed zone delineation using geographic information systems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22:267–271.

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Randall WK.

    1996. Forest tree seed zones for western Oregon. Salem (OR): Oregon Department of Forestry.
44. 1. Randall WK,
    2. Berrang P.

    2002. Washington tree seed transfer zones. Olympia (WA): Washington Department of Natural Resources.
45. 1. Read RA.

    1971. Browsing preference by jackrabbits in a ponderosa pine provenance plantation. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Note RM-186. 4 p.
46. 1. Read RA,
    2. Sprackling JA.

    1981. Hail damage variation by seed source in a ponderosa pine plantation. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Note RM-410. 6 p.
47. 1. Rehfeldt GE.

    1979. Ecotypic differentiation in populations of Pinus monticola in north Idaho—myth or reality? American Naturalist 114:627–636.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Rehfeldt GE.

    1990. Genetic differentiation among populations of Pinus ponderosa from the upper Colorado River Basin. Botanical Gazette 151:125–135.

    OpenUrl
49. 1. Rehfeldt GE.

    1994a. Adaptation of Picea engelmannii populations to the heterogeneous environments of the Intermountain West. Canadian Journal of Botany 72:1197–1208.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Rehfeldt GE.

    1994b. Evolutionary genetics, the biological species, and the ecology of interior cedar-hemlock forests. In: Proceedings of interior cedar-hemlock-white pine forests: ecology and management; 1993 Mar 2–4; Spokane, Washington. Pullman (WA): Washington State University. p 91–100.
51. 1. Rehfeldt GE,
    2. Wykoff WR.

    1981. Periodicity in shoot elongation among populations of Pinus contorta from the northern Rocky Mountains. Annals of Botany 48:371–377.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
52. 1. Rehfeldt GE,
    2. Ying CY,
    3. Spittlehouse DL,
    4. Hamilton DA Jr..

    1999. Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecological Monographs 69:375–407.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Schmidtling RC.

    2001. Southern pine seed sources. Asheville (NC): USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Research Station. General Technical Report SRS-44.
54. 1. Schott PK.

    1904. Pinus sylvestris L., die gemeine Kiefer. Beiträge zur Systematik und Provenienzfrage mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des in Deutschland in den Handel kommenden Samens. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 26:123–141, 307–324, 436–449, 515–536, 587–606.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Silen RR.

    1995. Personal communication. Corvallis (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Supervisory Research Geneticist.
56. 1. Silen RR,
    2. Mandel NL.

    1983. Clinal genetic growth variation within two Dou-glas-fir breeding zones. Journal of Forestry 81:216–220.

    OpenUrl
57. 1. Snaydon RW,
    2. Davies MS.

    1972. Rapid population differentiation in a mosaic environment. II. Morphological variation in Anthoxanthum odoratum. Evolution 26:390–405.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
58. 1. Sorensen FC,
    2. Weber JC.

    1994. Genetic variation and seed transfer guidelines for ponderosa pine in the Ochoco and Malheur National Forests of central Oregon. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Research Paper PNW-RP-468.
59. 1. Sorensen FC.

    1992. Genetic variation and seed transfer guidelines for lodge-pole pine in central Oregon. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Research Paper PNW-RP-453.
60. 1. Sorensen FC,
    2. Campbell RK,
    3. Franklin JF.

    1990. Geographic variation in growth and phenology of seedlings of the Abies procera/A. magnifica complex. Forest Ecology and Management 36:205–232.

    OpenUrl
61. 1. Sorensen FC,
    2. Mandel NL,
    3. Aagaard JE.

    2001. Role of selection versus historical isolation in racial differentiation of ponderosa pine in southern Ore-gon: an investigation of alternative hypotheses. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31:1127–1139.

    OpenUrl
62. 1. Spitze K.

    1993. Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135:367–374.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
63. 1. Squillace AE,
    2. Silen RR.

    1962. Racial variation in ponderosa pine. Forest Science Monograph 2:1–27.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Steinhoff RI,
    2. Joyce DG,
    3. Fins L.

    1983. Isozyme variation in Pinus monticola. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13:1122–1132.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
65. 1. Tree Seed Zone Map.

    1973. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service in cooperation with the Western Forest Tree Seed Council.
66. 1. Turesson G.

    1922. The genotypical response of plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3:211–350.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
67. 1. Turesson G.

    1930. The selective effect of climate upon the plant species. Hereditas 14:99–152.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
68. 1. [USDA] United States Department of Agriculture.

    1990. USDA plant hardiness zone map. USDA Agricultural Research Service. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1475.
69. 1. van Tienderen PH,
    2. van der Toorn J.

    1991. Genetic differentiation between populations of Plantago lanceolata. I. Local adaptation in three contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 79:27–42.

    OpenUrl
70. 1. Volis S,
    2. Yakubov B,
    3. Shulgina I,
    4. Ward D,
    5. Zur V,
    6. Mendlinger S.

    2001. Tests for adaptive RAPD variation in population genetic structure of wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum Koch. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 74:289–303.

    OpenUrl
71. 1. Wakeley PC,
    2. Bercaw TE.

    1965. Loblolly pine provenance test. Journal of Forestry 63(3):168–174.

    OpenUrl
72. 1. Westfall RD,
    2. Conkle MT.

    1992. Allozyme markers in breeding zone designation. New Forests 6:279–309.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
73. 1. White TL,
    2. Ching KK.

    1985. Provenance study of Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest region IV. Field performance at age 25 years. Silvae Genetica 34:84–90.

    OpenUrl
74. 1. Xie CY,
    2. Ying CC.

    1994. Adaptedness of noble fir (Abies procera Rehd.) beyond its northern limit. Forest Science 40:412–428.

    OpenUrl
75. 1. Yeh FC,
    2. Layton C.

    1979. The organization of genetic variability in central and marginal populations of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 21:487–503.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
76. 1. Ying CC.

    1997. Effects of site, provenance, provenance and site interaction in Sitka spruce in coastal British Columbia. Forest Genetics 4:99–112.

    OpenUrl
77. 1. Ying CC,
    2. Hunt RS.

    1987. Stability of resistance among Pinus contorta provenances to Lophodermella concolor needle cast. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17:1596–1601.

    OpenUrl
78. 1. Zon R.

    1913. Effect of source of seed upon the growth of Douglas fir. Forestry Quarterly 11:499–502.

    OpenUrl