Genetic Erosion

References

1. 1. Bartlett E,
   2. Novak SJ,
   3. Mack RN.

   2002. Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): differentiation in the eastern United States. American Journal of Botany 89:602–612.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Bever J,
   2. Felber F.

   1992. The theoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 8:185–217.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Falk DA,
   2. Holsinger KE

   1. Brown AHD,
   2. Briggs JD.

   1991. Sampling strategies for genetic variation in ex situ collections of endangered plant species. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. p 99–119.
4. 1. Engels JMM,
   2. Ramanatha Rao V,
   3. Brown AHD,
   4. Jackson MT

   1. Brown AHD,
   2. Brubaker CL.

   2002. Indicators of sustainable management of plant genetic resources: how well are we doing? In: Engels JMM, Ramanatha Rao V, Brown AHD, Jackson MT, editors. Managing plant genetic diversity. Oxon (UK): CABI Publishing. p 249–262.
5. 1. Buis S.

   2000. Writing woody plant specifications for restoration and mitigation practices. Native Plants Journal 1:116–119.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Buza L,
   2. Young A,
   3. Thrall P.

   2000. Genetic erosion, inbreeding, and reduced fitness in fragmented populations of the endangered tetraploid pea Swainsona recta. Biological Conservation 93:177–186.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Duryea ML,
   2. Landis TD

   1. Campbell RK,
   2. Sorensen FC.

   1984. Genetic implications of nursery practices. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD, editors. Forest nursery manual: production of bare-root seedlings. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Martinus Nijhoff. p 183–191.
8. 1. Charlesworth D,
   2. Charlesworth B.

   1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:237–268.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Cole CT.

   2003. Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:213–237.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Falk DA,
    2. Holsinger KE

    1. [CPC] Center for Plant Conservation.

    1991. Genetic sampling guidelines for conservation collections of endangered plants. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. p 225–238.
11. 1. Futuyma D,
    2. Antonovics J

    1. Crow JF.

    1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J, editors. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology. Vol. 9. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. p 3–42.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Demauro MM.

    1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lake-side daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7:542–550.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Edmands S,
    2. Timmerman CC.

    2003. Modeling factors affecting the severity of outbreeding depression. Conservation Biology 17:883–892.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Elkassaby YA,
    2. Thomson AJ.

    1996. Parental rank change associated with seed biology and nursery practices in Douglas-fir. Forest Science 42:228–235.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Ellstrand NC,
    2. Elam DR.

    1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:217–242.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Falk DA.

    1987. Integrated conservation strategies for endangered plants. Natural Areas Journal 7:118–123.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Falk DA,
    2. Holsinger KE

    , editors. 1991. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. 283 p.
18. 1. Frankham R,
    2. Ballou JD,
    3. Briscoe DA.

    2004. A primer of conservation genetics. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
19. 1. Futuyma DJ.

    1979. Evolutionary biology. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. 565 p.
20. 1. Gitzendanner MA,
    2. Soltis PS.

    2000. Patterns of variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. American Journal of Botany 87:783–792.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 1. Branwell D,
    2. Hamann O,
    3. Heywood V,
    4. Synge H

    1. Given DR.

    1987. What the conservationist requires of ex situ collections. In: Branwell D, Hamann O, Heywood V, Synge H, editors. Botanic gardens and the world conservation strategy. London (UK): Academic Press. p 103–116.
22. 1. Glémin S.

    2003. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus non-random mating. Evolution 57:2678–2687.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 1. Glendinning D.

    1989. Some aspects of autotetraploid population dynamics. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78:233–242.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Guarino L,
    2. Ramanatha Rao V,
    3. Reid R

    , editors. 1995. Collecting plant genetic diversity: technical guidelines. Wallingford (UK): CAB International.
25. 1. Fiedler PL,
    2. Jain SK

    1. Guerrant EO.

    1992. Genetic and demographic considerations in the sampling and reintroduction of rare plants. In: Fiedler PL, Jain SK, editors. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management. New York (NY): Routledge, Chapman and Hall Inc. p 321–344.
26. 1. Falk DA,
    2. Millar CI,
    3. Olwell M

    1. Guerrant EO.

    1996. Designing populations: demographic, genetic, and horticultural dimensions. In: Falk DA, Millar CI, Olwell M, editors. Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 171–207.
27. 1. Guerrant EO,
    2. Havens K,
    3. Maunder M

    , editors. 2004. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington (DC): Island Press. 424 p.
28. 1. Brown AHD,
    2. Clegg MT,
    3. Kahler AL,
    4. Weir BS

    1. Hamrick JL,
    2. Godt MJW.

    1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS, editors. Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. p 43–63.
29. 1. Hufford KM,
    2. Mazer SJ.

    2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Karron JD.

    1987. A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evolution and Ecology 1:47–58.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Falk DA,
    2. Holsinger KE

    1. Karron JD.

    1991. Patterns of genetic variation and breeding systems in rare plant species. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. p 87–98.
32. 1. Kitchen SG,
    2. McArthur ED.

    2001. Native or not: subjective labels and their application in wildland plantings. Native Plants Journal 2:21–24.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

    1990. Managing genetic diversity in a tree improvement program. Forest Ecology and Management 35:131–149.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Lacy RC.

    1987. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conservation Biology 1:143–158.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Landis TD,
    2. Dreesen DR,
    3. Dumroese RK.

    2003. Sex and the single Salix: considerations for riparian restoration. Native Plants Journal 4(2):111–117.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Elias TS

    1. Ledig FT.

    1987. Genetic structure and conservation of California’s endemic and near-endemic conifers. In: Elias TS, editor. Conservation and management of rare and endangered plants. Sacramento (CA): California Native Plant Society. p 587–594.
37. 1. Fenger MA,
    2. Miller EH,
    3. Johnson JF,
    4. Williams EJR

    1. Ledig FT.

    1991. Secret extinctions: the loss of genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. In: Fenger MA, Miller EH, Johnson JF, Williams EJR, editors. Our living legacy: proceedings of a symposium on biological diversity. Victoria (BC): Royal British Columbia Museum. p 127–140.
38. 1. Ledig FT.

    1992. Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 63:87–108.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Roundy BA,
    2. McArthur ED,
    3. Haley JS,
    4. Mann DK

    1. Linhart YB.

    1995. Restoration, revegetation, and the importance of genetic and evolutionary perspectives. In: Roundy BA, McArthur ED, Haley JS, Mann DK, compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report INT-GTR-315. p 271–287.
40. 1. Lynch M,
    2. Gabriel W.

    1990. Genetic load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44:1725–1737.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. McGuire PE,
    2. Qualset CO

    , editors. 1990. Genetic resources at risk: scientific issues, technologies, and funding policies. Davis (CA): University of California, Genetic Resources Conservation Program. Report No. 5.
42. 1. McNeely JA,
    2. Miller KR,
    3. Reid WV,
    4. Mittermeier RA,
    5. Werner TB.

    1990. Conserving the world’s biological diversity. Washington (DC): World Conservation Union, World Resources Institute, Conservation International, World Wildlife Fund-US, and the World Bank.
43. 1. Meyer SE,
    2. Kitchen SG.

    1994. Life history variation in blue flax (Linum perenne: Linaceae) seed germination phenology. American Journal of Botany 81: 528–535.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Landis TD

    1. Meyer SE,
    2. Monsen SB.

    1993. Genetic considerations in propagating native shrubs, forbs, and grasses from seed. In: Landis TD, technical coordinator. Proceedings, Western Forest Nursery Association symposium; 1992 Sep 14–18; Fallen Leaf Lake, CA. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report RM-GTR-221. p 47–54.
45. 1. Millar CI,
    2. Libby WJ.

    1989. Disneyland or native ecosystem: genetics and the restorationist. Restoration and Management Notes 7:18–24.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Pappert RA,
    2. Hamrick JL,
    3. Donovan LA.

    2000. Genetic variation in Pueraria lobata (Fabaceae), an introduced, clonal, invasive plant of the southeastern United States. American Journal of Botany 87:1240–1245.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
47. 1. Pellegrin D,
    2. Hauber DP.

    1999. Isozyme variation among populations of the clonal species, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steudel. Aquatic Botany 63:241–259.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Reinartz JA.

    1995. Planting state-listed endangered and threatened plants. Conservation Biology 9:771–781.

    OpenUrl
49. 1. Rogers DL,
    2. Ledig FT.

    1996. The status of temperate North American forest genetic resources. Davis (CA): University of California, Genetic Resources Conservation Program. Report No. 16.
50. 1. Saltonstall K.

    2002. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 99:2445–2449.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
51. 1. Engels JMM,
    2. Ramanatha Rao V,
    3. Brown AHD,
    4. Jackson MT

    1. Scarascia-Mugnozza GT,
    2. Perrino P.

    2002. The history of ex situ conservation and use of plant genetic resources. In: Engels JMM, Ramanatha Rao V, Brown AHD, Jackson MT, editors. Managing plant genetic diversity. Oxon (UK): CABI Publishing. p 1–22.
52. 1. Schmid B.

    1994. Effects of genetic diversity in experimental stands of Sol-idago altissima: evidence for the potential role of pathogens as selective agents in plant populations. Journal of Ecology 82:165–175.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Tecic DL,
    2. McBride JL,
    3. Bowles ML,
    4. Nickrent DL.

    1998. Genetic variability in the federal threatened Mead’s milkweed, Asclepias meadii Torrey (Ascle-piadaceae), as determined by allozyme electrophoresis. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85:97–109.

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Templeton AR,
    2. Shaw K,
    3. Routman E,
    4. Davis SK.

    1990. The genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77:13–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. 1. Tsutsui ND,
    2. Suarez AV,
    3. Holway DA,
    4. Case TJ.

    2000. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97:5948–5953.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
56. 1. USDA NRCS.

    2004. The PLANTS Database, version 3.5. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 18 Aug 2004). Baton Rouge (LA): National Plant Data Center.
57. 1. Wang RL,
    2. Wendel JF,
    3. Dekker JH.

    1995. Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. I. Isozyme analysis of genetic diversity and population genetic structure in Setaria viridis. American Journal of Botany 82:308–317.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
58. 1. Williams SL,
    2. Davis CA.

    1996. Population genetic analyses of transplanted eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds reveal reduced genetic diversity in southern California. Restoration Ecology 4:163–180.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. 1. Williams SL.

    2001. Reduced genetic diversity in eelgrass transplantations affects both population growth and individual fitness. Ecological Applications 11:1472–1488.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
60. 1. Wright S.

    1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159.

    OpenUrlPubMed