Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research Article

Genetic Erosion

No longer just an agricultural issue

Deborah L Rogers
Native Plants Journal, September 2004, 5 (2) 112-122; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/NPJ.2004.5.2.112
Deborah L Rogers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Bartlett E,
    2. Novak SJ,
    3. Mack RN.
    2002. Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): differentiation in the eastern United States. American Journal of Botany 89:602–612.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bever J,
    2. Felber F.
    1992. The theoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 8:185–217.
    OpenUrl
    1. Brown AHD,
    2. Briggs JD.
    1991. Sampling strategies for genetic variation in ex situ collections of endangered plant species. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. p 99–119.
    1. Brown AHD,
    2. Brubaker CL.
    2002. Indicators of sustainable management of plant genetic resources: how well are we doing? In: Engels JMM, Ramanatha Rao V, Brown AHD, Jackson MT, editors. Managing plant genetic diversity. Oxon (UK): CABI Publishing. p 249–262.
    1. Buis S.
    2000. Writing woody plant specifications for restoration and mitigation practices. Native Plants Journal 1:116–119.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Buza L,
    2. Young A,
    3. Thrall P.
    2000. Genetic erosion, inbreeding, and reduced fitness in fragmented populations of the endangered tetraploid pea Swainsona recta. Biological Conservation 93:177–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Campbell RK,
    2. Sorensen FC.
    1984. Genetic implications of nursery practices. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD, editors. Forest nursery manual: production of bare-root seedlings. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Martinus Nijhoff. p 183–191.
    1. Charlesworth D,
    2. Charlesworth B.
    1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:237–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Cole CT.
    2003. Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:213–237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. [CPC] Center for Plant Conservation.
    1991. Genetic sampling guidelines for conservation collections of endangered plants. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. p 225–238.
    1. Crow JF.
    1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J, editors. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology. Vol. 9. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. p 3–42.
    OpenUrl
    1. Demauro MM.
    1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lake-side daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7:542–550.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Edmands S,
    2. Timmerman CC.
    2003. Modeling factors affecting the severity of outbreeding depression. Conservation Biology 17:883–892.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Elkassaby YA,
    2. Thomson AJ.
    1996. Parental rank change associated with seed biology and nursery practices in Douglas-fir. Forest Science 42:228–235.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ellstrand NC,
    2. Elam DR.
    1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:217–242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Falk DA.
    1987. Integrated conservation strategies for endangered plants. Natural Areas Journal 7:118–123.
    OpenUrl
    1. Falk DA,
    2. Holsinger KE
    , editors. 1991. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. 283 p.
    1. Frankham R,
    2. Ballou JD,
    3. Briscoe DA.
    2004. A primer of conservation genetics. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
    1. Futuyma DJ.
    1979. Evolutionary biology. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. 565 p.
    1. Gitzendanner MA,
    2. Soltis PS.
    2000. Patterns of variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. American Journal of Botany 87:783–792.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Given DR.
    1987. What the conservationist requires of ex situ collections. In: Branwell D, Hamann O, Heywood V, Synge H, editors. Botanic gardens and the world conservation strategy. London (UK): Academic Press. p 103–116.
    1. Glémin S.
    2003. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus non-random mating. Evolution 57:2678–2687.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Glendinning D.
    1989. Some aspects of autotetraploid population dynamics. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78:233–242.
    OpenUrl
    1. Guarino L,
    2. Ramanatha Rao V,
    3. Reid R
    , editors. 1995. Collecting plant genetic diversity: technical guidelines. Wallingford (UK): CAB International.
    1. Guerrant EO.
    1992. Genetic and demographic considerations in the sampling and reintroduction of rare plants. In: Fiedler PL, Jain SK, editors. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management. New York (NY): Routledge, Chapman and Hall Inc. p 321–344.
    1. Guerrant EO.
    1996. Designing populations: demographic, genetic, and horticultural dimensions. In: Falk DA, Millar CI, Olwell M, editors. Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 171–207.
    1. Guerrant EO,
    2. Havens K,
    3. Maunder M
    , editors. 2004. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington (DC): Island Press. 424 p.
    1. Hamrick JL,
    2. Godt MJW.
    1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS, editors. Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. p 43–63.
    1. Hufford KM,
    2. Mazer SJ.
    2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Karron JD.
    1987. A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evolution and Ecology 1:47–58.
    OpenUrl
    1. Karron JD.
    1991. Patterns of genetic variation and breeding systems in rare plant species. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York (NY): Oxford University Press. p 87–98.
    1. Kitchen SG,
    2. McArthur ED.
    2001. Native or not: subjective labels and their application in wildland plantings. Native Plants Journal 2:21–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kitzmiller JH.
    1990. Managing genetic diversity in a tree improvement program. Forest Ecology and Management 35:131–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lacy RC.
    1987. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conservation Biology 1:143–158.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Landis TD,
    2. Dreesen DR,
    3. Dumroese RK.
    2003. Sex and the single Salix: considerations for riparian restoration. Native Plants Journal 4(2):111–117.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ledig FT.
    1987. Genetic structure and conservation of California’s endemic and near-endemic conifers. In: Elias TS, editor. Conservation and management of rare and endangered plants. Sacramento (CA): California Native Plant Society. p 587–594.
    1. Ledig FT.
    1991. Secret extinctions: the loss of genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. In: Fenger MA, Miller EH, Johnson JF, Williams EJR, editors. Our living legacy: proceedings of a symposium on biological diversity. Victoria (BC): Royal British Columbia Museum. p 127–140.
    1. Ledig FT.
    1992. Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 63:87–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Linhart YB.
    1995. Restoration, revegetation, and the importance of genetic and evolutionary perspectives. In: Roundy BA, McArthur ED, Haley JS, Mann DK, compilers. Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report INT-GTR-315. p 271–287.
    1. Lynch M,
    2. Gabriel W.
    1990. Genetic load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44:1725–1737.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McGuire PE,
    2. Qualset CO
    , editors. 1990. Genetic resources at risk: scientific issues, technologies, and funding policies. Davis (CA): University of California, Genetic Resources Conservation Program. Report No. 5.
    1. McNeely JA,
    2. Miller KR,
    3. Reid WV,
    4. Mittermeier RA,
    5. Werner TB.
    1990. Conserving the world’s biological diversity. Washington (DC): World Conservation Union, World Resources Institute, Conservation International, World Wildlife Fund-US, and the World Bank.
    1. Meyer SE,
    2. Kitchen SG.
    1994. Life history variation in blue flax (Linum perenne: Linaceae) seed germination phenology. American Journal of Botany 81: 528–535.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Meyer SE,
    2. Monsen SB.
    1993. Genetic considerations in propagating native shrubs, forbs, and grasses from seed. In: Landis TD, technical coordinator. Proceedings, Western Forest Nursery Association symposium; 1992 Sep 14–18; Fallen Leaf Lake, CA. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report RM-GTR-221. p 47–54.
    1. Millar CI,
    2. Libby WJ.
    1989. Disneyland or native ecosystem: genetics and the restorationist. Restoration and Management Notes 7:18–24.
    OpenUrl
    1. Pappert RA,
    2. Hamrick JL,
    3. Donovan LA.
    2000. Genetic variation in Pueraria lobata (Fabaceae), an introduced, clonal, invasive plant of the southeastern United States. American Journal of Botany 87:1240–1245.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pellegrin D,
    2. Hauber DP.
    1999. Isozyme variation among populations of the clonal species, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steudel. Aquatic Botany 63:241–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Reinartz JA.
    1995. Planting state-listed endangered and threatened plants. Conservation Biology 9:771–781.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rogers DL,
    2. Ledig FT.
    1996. The status of temperate North American forest genetic resources. Davis (CA): University of California, Genetic Resources Conservation Program. Report No. 16.
    1. Saltonstall K.
    2002. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 99:2445–2449.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Scarascia-Mugnozza GT,
    2. Perrino P.
    2002. The history of ex situ conservation and use of plant genetic resources. In: Engels JMM, Ramanatha Rao V, Brown AHD, Jackson MT, editors. Managing plant genetic diversity. Oxon (UK): CABI Publishing. p 1–22.
    1. Schmid B.
    1994. Effects of genetic diversity in experimental stands of Sol-idago altissima: evidence for the potential role of pathogens as selective agents in plant populations. Journal of Ecology 82:165–175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Tecic DL,
    2. McBride JL,
    3. Bowles ML,
    4. Nickrent DL.
    1998. Genetic variability in the federal threatened Mead’s milkweed, Asclepias meadii Torrey (Ascle-piadaceae), as determined by allozyme electrophoresis. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85:97–109.
    OpenUrl
    1. Templeton AR,
    2. Shaw K,
    3. Routman E,
    4. Davis SK.
    1990. The genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77:13–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Tsutsui ND,
    2. Suarez AV,
    3. Holway DA,
    4. Case TJ.
    2000. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97:5948–5953.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. USDA NRCS.
    2004. The PLANTS Database, version 3.5. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 18 Aug 2004). Baton Rouge (LA): National Plant Data Center.
    1. Wang RL,
    2. Wendel JF,
    3. Dekker JH.
    1995. Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. I. Isozyme analysis of genetic diversity and population genetic structure in Setaria viridis. American Journal of Botany 82:308–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Williams SL,
    2. Davis CA.
    1996. Population genetic analyses of transplanted eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds reveal reduced genetic diversity in southern California. Restoration Ecology 4:163–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Williams SL.
    2001. Reduced genetic diversity in eelgrass transplantations affects both population growth and individual fitness. Ecological Applications 11:1472–1488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Wright S.
    1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 5 (2)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 5, Issue 2
21 Sep 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic Erosion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Genetic Erosion
Deborah L Rogers
Native Plants Journal Sep 2004, 5 (2) 112-122; DOI: 10.2979/NPJ.2004.5.2.112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Genetic Erosion
Deborah L Rogers
Native Plants Journal Sep 2004, 5 (2) 112-122; DOI: 10.2979/NPJ.2004.5.2.112
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Regional native seed cooperatives: working toward available, affordable, and appropriate native seed
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • genetic diversity
  • reforestation
  • restoration
  • revegetation
  • source materials
  • natural areas
  • conservation
  • USDA NRCS (2004)
UW Press logo

© 2025 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire