Performance of 3 Florida native grasses grown in varying container substrates

References

1. ↵
   1. Altland JE,
   2. Buamscha G

   . 2008. Nutrient availability from Douglas fir bark in response to substrate pH. HortScience 43:478–483. doi.org: doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.43.2.478

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   1. Bendor T,
   2. Lester TW,
   3. Livengood A,
   4. Davis A,
   5. Yonavjak L

   . 2015. Estimating the size and impact of the ecological restoration economy. PLoS ONE 10(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128339

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Bragg NC,
   2. Chambers BJ

   . 1988. Interpretation and advisory applications of compost air-filled porosity (AFP) measurements. Acta Horticulturae 221:35–44. doi:/10.17660/ActaHortic.1988.221.3

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Braslow J,
   2. Evans R

   . 2013. Improving nursery production of fifteen California native plant species: the effect of air-filled porosity. Native Plants Journal 16(3):249–257.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Brzuszek RF,
   2. Harkess RL

   . 2009. Green industry survey of native plant marketing in the southeastern United States. HortTechnology 19:1–5. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH.19.1.168

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Fields JS,
   2. Owen JS,
   3. Scoggins HL

   . 2017. The influence of substrate hydraulic conductivity of plant water status of an ornamental container crop grown in suboptimal substrate water potentials. 52:1419–1428. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI11987-17

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. [FANN] Florida Association of Native Nurseries

   . 2024. Personal communication. Melbourne (FL).
8. ↵
   1. [FNAI] Florida Natural Areas Inventory

   . 2010. Guide to the natural communities of Florida. URL: https://www.fnai.org/publications/natural-community-book (accessed 7 Feb 2024). Tallahassee (FL): Florida Natural Areas Inventory.
9. ↵
   1. Higgins A

   . 2017. Is this popular gardening material bad for the planet? URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/home/should-sustainable-gardeners-use-peat-moss/2017/05/09/1fc746f0-3118-11e7-9534-00e4656c22aa_story.html (accessed 21 Jan 2024). Washington (DC): The Washington Post.
10. 1. [HTA] Horticultural Trade Association

    . 2022. Growing media report. URL: https://hta.org.uk/media/inunqxu3/growing-media-monitor-report-2022.pdf (accessed 18 Jan 2022). Oxfordshire (UK): Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
11. ↵
    1. Lorente B,
    2. Zugasti I,
    3. Ortuño MF,
    4. Nortes P,
    5. Bañón S,
    6. Hernández JA,
    7. Sánchez-Blanco MJ

    . 2021. Substrate composition affects the development of water stress and subsequent recovery by inducing physiological changes in Cistus albidus plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 158:125–135.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. ↵
    1. Meyer MH,
    2. Cunliffe BA

    . 2004. Effects of media porosity and container size on overwintering and growth of ornamental grasses. HortScience 39:248–250. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.39.2.248

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Mimirichi Green Inc

    . 2022. Peat alternatives during shortage and beyond. URL: https://mirimichigreen.com/articles/peat-alternative/ (accessed 25 Mar 2023). Castle Hayne (NC).
14. ↵
    1. Mylavarapu R,
    2. Yeager T

    . 2022. UF/IFAS extension nutrient management series: container media nutrient test interpretation. URL: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/SS316 (accessed 8 Feb 2024). Electronic Document Information Services (EDIS) publication #SS316. Gainesville (FL): UF/IFAS.
15. ↵
    1. Niedziela CE,
    2. Nelson PV

    . 1992. A rapid method for determining physical properties of undisturbed substrate. HortScience 27:1279–1280. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.27.12.1279

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Noss RF

    . 2018. Fire ecology of Florida and the southeastern coastal plain. Gainesville (FL): University Press of Florida.
17. 1. Oliveira ACC,
    2. Forti VA,
    3. Loiola PP,
    4. Viani RAG

    . 2019. Techniques for seedling production of two native grasses: new perspectives for Brazilian Cerrado restoration. Restoration Ecology 28(2):297–303. doi:10.1111/rec.13103

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. R Core Team

    . 2024. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 2024).
19. ↵
    1. RStudio Team

    . 2024. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston (MA): RStudio, PBC. URL: http://www.rstudio.com/ (accessed 2024).
20. ↵
    1. Roach M

    . 2022. Why gardeners should stop using peat, and what to use instead. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/02/realestate/gardening-peat.html (accessed 7 Jan 2024). New York (NY): New York Times.
21. ↵
    1. Smith AM,
    2. Wilson SB,
    3. Thetford M,
    4. Nolan KL,
    5. Adams CR

    . 2014. Performance of nine Florida native wildflower species grown in varying container substrates. Native Plants Journal 15(1):75–86. doi:10.3368/npj.15.1.75

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    1. Tangren S,
    2. Toth E,
    3. Siegel S

    . 2022. A survey of native plant materials use and commercial availability in the eastern United States. Native Plants Journal 23(1):17–32. doi:10.3368/npj.23.1.17

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    1. Torres AP,
    2. Rihn AL,
    3. Barton SS,
    4. Behe BK

    . 2024. Perceptions and socioeconomic status influence purchases of native plants. HortTechnology 34:153–160. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH05345-23

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Trusty JL,
    2. Ober HK

    . 2011. Determinants of successful groundcover restoration in forests of the southeastern United States. Journal for Nature Conservation 19(1):34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2010.05.001

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

    . 2024. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 27 Jan 2024). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
26. ↵
    1. White A,
    2. Fant JB,
    3. Havens K,
    4. Skinner M,
    5. Kramer AT

    . 2018. Restoring species diversity: assessing capacity in the U.S. native plant industry. Restoration Ecology 26(4):605–611. doi:10.1111/rec.12705

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Williams MJ,
    2. Grabowski J,
    3. Williams B

    . 2013. Developing sources of native grass seed for revegetation in Florida. Rangelands 35(5):93–97. doi:10.2111/RANGELANDS-D-13-00024.1

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Wilson SB,
    2. Stoffella PJ

    . 2006. Using compost for container production of ornamental wetland and flatwood species native to Florida. Native Plants Journal 7(3):293–300.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Wilson SB,
    2. Mecca LK,
    3. Danielson HE,
    4. Graetz DA,
    5. Stoffella PJ

    . 2006. Container and field evaluation of three native shrubs grown in compostbased media. Compost Science & Utilization 4(3):178–183.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Wunderlin RP,
    2. Hansen BF

    . 2011. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. 3rd ed. Gainesville (FL): University Press of Florida.
31. ↵
    1. Wunderlin RP,
    2. Hansen BF,
    3. Franck AR,
    4. Essig FB

    . 2024. Atlas of Florida plants. URL: https://florida.plantatlas.usf.edu (accessed 16 Nov 2023). Tampa (FL): Institute for Systematic Botany, University of South Florida.
32. ↵
    1. Zinnen J,
    2. Matthews JW

    . 2022. Native species richness of commercial plant vendors in the Midwestern United States. Native Plants Journal 23(1):1–15. doi:10.3368/npj.23.1.4

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text