Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleRefereed Research
Open Access

Fine-scale trait variation of five native forbs along environmental gradients

Sasha Victor, Kyle Doherty, Mary Ellyn DuPre, Philip W Ramsey and Ylva Lekberg
Native Plants Journal, September 2023, 24 (3) 192-205; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.24.3.192
Sasha Victor
MPG Ranch, , Missoula, MT 59801
Roles: Ecological Restoration Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sashavictor{at}gmail.com
Kyle Doherty
MPG Ranch, , Missoula, MT 59801
Roles: Spatial Ecologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kdoherty{at}mpgranch.com
Mary Ellyn DuPre
MPG Ranch, , Missoula, MT 59801
Roles: Community Ecologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: medupre{at}mpgranch.com
Philip W Ramsey
MPG Ranch, , Missoula, MT 59801
Roles: General Manager and Ecologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pramsey{at}mpgranch.com
Ylva Lekberg
Adjunct Professor, University of Montana
MPG Ranch, , Missoula, MT 59801
Roles: Ecologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ylekberg{at}mpgranch.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Adler PB,
    2. Salguero-Gómez R,
    3. Compagnoni A,
    4. Hsu JS,
    5. Ray-Mukherjee J,
    6. Mbeau-Ache C,
    7. Franco M
    . 2014. Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111:article 10019.
  2. ↵
    1. Balazs KR,
    2. Kramer AT,
    3. Munson SM,
    4. Talkington N,
    5. Still S,
    6. Butterfield BJ
    . 2020. The right trait in the right place at the right time: matching traits to environment improves restoration outcomes. Ecological Applications 30:1–7.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Bischoff A,
    2. Crémieux L,
    3. Smilauerova M,
    4. Lawson CS,
    5. Mortimer SR,
    6. Dolezal J,
    7. Lanta V,
    8. Edwards AR,
    9. Brook AJ,
    10. Macel M,
    11. Leps J,
    12. Steinger T,
    13. Müller-Schärer H
    . 2006. Detecting local adaptation in widespread grassland species: the importance of scale and local plant community. Journal of Ecology 94:1130–1142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Bower AD,
    2. St Clair JB,
    3. Erickson V
    . 2014. Generalized provisional seed zones for native plants. Ecological Applications 24:913–919.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bucharova A,
    2. Bossdorf O,
    3. Hölzel N,
    4. Kollmann J,
    5. Prasse R,
    6. Durka W
    . 2019. Mix and match: regional admixture provenancing strikes a balance among different seed-sourcing strategies for ecological restoration. Conservation Genetics 20:7–17.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Bullington L,
    2. Lekberg Y,
    3. Larkin B
    . 2020. Sampling constrains our characterization of plant microbiomes : are we losing site of the trees in the forest of microbial diversity ? ResearchGate, June. doi:10.22541/au.159110425.53117108
  7. ↵
    1. Coomes DA,
    2. Grubb PJ
    . 2003. Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:283–291.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Corripio J
    . 2019. Functions to compute insolation on complex terrain. Documentation on the R Package ‘Inson’, version 1.1.1. Available from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/insol/insol.pdf (accessed July 2020).
  9. ↵
    1. Daly E,
    2. Porporato A
    . 2005. A review of soil moisture dynamics: from rainfall infiltration to ecosystem response. Environmental Engineering Science 22:9–24.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Davidson BE,
    2. Germino MJ
    . 2020. Spatial grain of adaptation is much finer than ecoregional-scale common gardens reveal. Ecology and Evolution 10(18):9920–9931. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6651
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Delavaux CS,
    2. Smith-Ramesh LM,
    3. Kuebbing SE
    . 2017. Beyond nutrients: a meta-analysis of the diverse effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plants and soils. Ecology 98:2111–2119.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Díaz S,
    2. Hodgson JG,
    3. Thompson K,
    4. Cabido M,
    5. Cornelissen JHC,
    6. Jalili A,
    7. Montserrat-Martí G,
    8. Grime JP,
    9. Zarrinkamar F,
    10. Asri Y,
    11. Band SR,
    12. Basconcelo S,
    13. Castro-Díez P,
    14. Funes G,
    15. Hamzehee B,
    16. Khoshnevi M,
    17. Pérez-Harguindeguy N,
    18. Pérez-Rontomé MC,
    19. Shirvany A,
    20. Vendramini F,
    21. Yazdani S,
    22. Abbas-Azimi R,
    23. Bogaard A,
    24. Boustani S,
    25. Charles M,
    26. Dehghan M,
    27. de Torres-Espuny L,
    28. Falczuk V,
    29. Guerrero-Campo J,
    30. Hynd A,
    31. Jones G,
    32. Kowsary E,
    33. Kazemi-Saeed F,
    34. Maestro-Martínez M,
    35. Romo-Díez A,
    36. Shaw S,
    37. Siavash B,
    38. Villar-Salvador P,
    39. Zak MR
    . 2004. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Doherty KD,
    2. Kuhlman MP,
    3. Durham RA,
    4. Ramsey PW,
    5. Mummey DL
    . 2021. Fine-grained topographic diversity data improve site prioritization outcomes for bees. Ecological Indicators 132:article108315.
  14. ↵
    1. Durham RA,
    2. Mummey DL,
    3. Shreading LN,
    4. Ramsey PW
    . 2017. Phenological patterns differ between exotic and native plants: field observations from the Sapphire Mountains, Montana. Natural Areas Journal 37:361–381.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Durham RA,
    2. Doherty KD,
    3. Antoninka AJ,
    4. Ramsey PW,
    5. Bowker MA
    . 2018. Insolation and disturbance history drive biocrust biodiversity in Western Montana rangelands. Plant and Soil 430:151–169.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Erickson VJ,
    2. Halford A
    . 2020. Seed planning, sourcing, and procurement. Restoration Ecology 28:S216–S224.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Fox J,
    2. Weisberg S,
    3. Adler D,
    4. Bates D,
    5. Baud-Bovy G,
    6. Ellison S,
    7. Firth D,
    8. Friendly M,
    9. Gorjanc G,
    10. Graves S
    . 2012. Package ‘car’. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing 16.
  18. ↵
    1. Geber MA,
    2. Griffen LR
    . 2003. Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164(S3 May). https://doi.org/10/1086/368233
  19. ↵
    1. Gibson AL,
    2. Espeland EK,
    3. Wagner V,
    4. Nelson CR
    . 2016. Can local adaptation research in plants inform selection of native plant materials? An analysis of experimental methodologies. Evolutionary Applications 9:1219–1228.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Goldberg DE,
    2. Landa K
    . 1991. Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. Journal of Ecology 79:1013–1030.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Gratani L
    . 2014. Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Advances in Botany 2014:1–17.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Harrell FE
    . 2020. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R Package version 4.4-0. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc.
  23. ↵
    1. Hartigan JA,
    2. Wong MA
    . 1979. Algorithm AS 136 A K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B Methodological 28:100–108.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Havens K,
    2. Vitt P,
    3. Still S,
    4. Kramer AT,
    5. Fant JB,
    6. Schatz K
    . 2015. Seed sourcing for restoration in an era of climate change. Natural Areas Journal 35:122–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Johnson G,
    2. Sorensen FC,
    3. St Clair JB,
    4. Cronn RC
    . 2004. Pacific Northwest forest tree seed zones: a template for native plants? Native Plants Journal 5:131–140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Kettenring KM,
    2. Mercer KL,
    3. Reinhardt Adams C,
    4. Hines J
    . 2014. Application of genetic diversity-ecosystem function research to ecological restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:339–348.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Kunkel V,
    2. Wells T,
    3. Hancock GR
    . 2016. Soil temperature dynamics at the catchment scale. Geoderma 273:32–44.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Kytöviita MM
    . 2005. Asymmetric symbiont adaptation to Arctic conditions could explain why high Arctic plants are non-mycorrhizal. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 53(1):27–32. https.doi.org/10/1016/j.femsec.2004.09.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Larcher W,
    2. Kainmüller C,
    3. Wagner J
    . 2010. Survival types of high mountain plants under extreme temperatures. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 205:3–18.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Larson JE,
    2. Sheley RL,
    3. Hardegree SP,
    4. Doescher PS,
    5. James JJ
    . 2015. Seed and seedling traits affecting critical life stage transitions and recruitment outcomes in dryland grasses. Journal of Applied Ecology 52:199–209.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Lawler JJ,
    2. Ackerly DD,
    3. Albano CM,
    4. Anderson MG,
    5. Dobrowski SZ,
    6. Gill JL,
    7. Heller NE,
    8. Pressey RL,
    9. Sanderson EW,
    10. Weiss SB
    . 2015. The theory behind, and the challenges of, conserving nature’s stage in a time of rapid change. Conservation Biology 29:618–629.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Leger EA,
    2. Barga S,
    3. Agneray AC,
    4. Baughman O,
    5. Burton R,
    6. Williams M
    . 2021. Selecting native plants for restoration using rapid screening for adaptive traits: methods and outcomes in a Great Basin case study. Restoration Ecology 29:1–9.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Leishman MR
    . 2001. Does the seed size / number trade-off model determine plant community structure ? An assessment of the model mechanisms and their generality. Oikos 93:294–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Liancourt P,
    2. Callaway RM,
    3. Michalet R
    . 2005. Stress tolerance and competitive-response ability determine the outcome of biotic interactions. Ecology 86:1611–1618. Also accessible through ScholarWorks at University of Montana, Biological Sciences Faculty Publications. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/biosci_pubs/219
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. McInnes L,
    2. Healy J,
    3. Astels S
    . 2017. hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering. Journal of Open Source Software 2:205.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. McKay JK,
    2. Christian CE,
    3. Harrison S,
    4. Rice KJ
    . 2005. ‘How local is local?’ A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:432–440.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Meisner A,
    2. De Deyn GB,
    3. De Boer W,
    4. Van Der Putten WH
    . 2013. Soil biotic legacy effects of extreme weather events influence plant invasiveness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:9835–9838.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Montana Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Rocky Mountain Lower Montane, Foothill, and Valley Grassland. Montana Field Guides.
  39. ↵
    1. Morecroft MD,
    2. Woodward FI
    . 1996. Experiments on the causes of altitudinal differences in the leaf nutrient contents, size and δ13C of Alchemilla alpina. New Phytologist 134:471–479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Mueggler WF,
    2. Stewart WL
    . 1980. Grassland and shrubland habitat types of western Montana. General Technical Report INT-66. Ogden, Utah: USDA Forest, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 154 p.
  41. ↵
    1. Nguyen NH,
    2. Song Z,
    3. Bates ST,
    4. Branco S,
    5. Tedersoo L,
    6. Menke J,
    7. Schilling JS,
    8. Kennedy PG
    . 2016. FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecology 20:241–248.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Nilsson RH,
    2. Larsson KH,
    3. Taylor AFS,
    4. Bengtsson-Palme J,
    5. Jeppesen TS,
    6. Schigel D,
    7. Kennedy P,
    8. Picard K,
    9. Glöckner FO,
    10. Tedersoo L,
    11. Saar I,
    12. Kõljalg U,
    13. Abarenkov K
    . 2019. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Research 47:D259–D264.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Nolan M,
    2. Dewees S,
    3. Lucero SM
    . 2021. Identifying effective restoration approaches to maximize plant establishment in California grasslands through a meta-analysis. Restoration Ecology 29(4). doi: 10.1111/rec.13370
  44. ↵
    1. Pedrini S,
    2. Dixon KW
    . 2020. International principles and standards for native seeds in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 28:S286–S303.
    OpenUrl
    1. Pedrini S,
    2. Gibson-Roy P,
    3. Trivedi C,
    4. Gálvez-Ramírez C,
    5. Hardwick K,
    6. Shaw N,
    7. Frischie S,
    8. Laverack G,
    9. Dixon K
    . 2020. Collection and production of native seeds for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 28:S228–S238.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Pérez-Harguindeguy N,
    2. Díaz S,
    3. Garnier E,
    4. Lavorel S,
    5. Poorter H,
    6. Jaureguiberry P,
    7. Bret-Harte MS,
    8. Cornwell WK,
    9. Craine JM,
    10. Gurvich DE,
    11. Urcelay C,
    12. Veneklaas EJ,
    13. Reich PB,
    14. Poorter L,
    15. Wright IJ,
    16. Ray P,
    17. Enrico L,
    18. Pausas JG,
    19. De Vos AC,
    20. Buchmann N,
    21. Funes G,
    22. Quétier F,
    23. Hodgson JG,
    24. Thompson K,
    25. Morgan HD,
    26. Ter Steege H,
    27. Van Der Heijden MGA,
    28. Sack L,
    29. Blonder B,
    30. Poschlod P,
    31. Vaieretti MV.,
    32. Conti G,
    33. Staver AC,
    34. Aquino S,
    35. Cornelissen JHC
    . 2013. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 61:167–234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Poorter H,
    2. Niinemets Ü,
    3. Poorter L,
    4. Wright IJ,
    5. Villar R
    . 2009. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytologist 182:565–588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Qi W,
    2. Bu H,
    3. Cornelissen JHC,
    4. Zhang C,
    5. Guo S,
    6. Wang J,
    7. Zhou X,
    8. Li W,
    9. Du G
    . 2015. Untangling interacting mechanisms of seed mass variation with elevation: insights from the comparison of inter-specific and intra-specific studies on eastern Tibetan angiosperm species. Plant Ecology 216:283–292.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: https://www.R-project.org/
  49. ↵
    1. Raaijmakers JM,
    2. Paulitz TC,
    3. Steinberg C,
    4. Alabouvette C,
    5. Moënne-Loccoz Y
    . 2009. The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant and Soil 321:341–361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Reid I
    . 1973. The influence of slope orientation upon the soil moisture regime, and its hydrogeomorphological significance. Journal of Hydrology 19:309–321.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  51. ↵
    1. Ren C,
    2. Zhang W,
    3. Zhong ZK,
    4. Han X,
    5. Yang G,
    6. Feng Y,
    7. Ren G
    . 2018. Differential responses of soil microbial biomass, diversity, and compositions to altitudinal gradients depend on plant and soil characteristics. Science of the Total Environment 610–611:750–758.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Revillini D,
    2. Gehring CA,
    3. Johnson NC
    . 2016. The role of locally adapted mycorrhizas and rhizobacteria in plant–soil feedback systems. Functional Ecology 30:1086–1098.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Reynolds HL,
    2. Packer A,
    3. Bever JD,
    4. Clay K
    . 2003. Grassroots ecology: plant-microbe-soil interactions as drivers of plant community structure and dynamics. Ecology 84:2281–2291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. Roybal CM,
    2. Butterfield BJ
    . 2018. Functional trait heritability and local climatic adaptation among grasses: a meta-analysis. Plant Ecology 219:369–379.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Rudgers JA,
    2. Afkhami ME,
    3. Bell-Dereske L,
    4. Chung YA,
    5. Crawford KM,
    6. Kivlin SN,
    7. Mann MA,
    8. Nuñez MA
    . 2020. Climate disruption of plant-microbe interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 51:561–586.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Rustad LE,
    2. Campbell JL,
    3. Marion GM,
    4. Norby RJ,
    5. Mitchell MJ,
    6. Hartley AE,
    7. Cornelissen JHC,
    8. Gurevitch J,
    9. Alward R,
    10. Beier C
    , and others. 2001. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–562.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    1. Scheepens JF,
    2. Frei ES,
    3. Stöcklin J
    . 2010. Genotypic and environmental variation in specific leaf area in a widespread Alpine plant after transplantation to different altitudes. Oecologia 164:141–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Shackelford N,
    2. Paterno GB,
    3. Winkler DE,
    4. Erickson TE,
    5. Leger EA,
    6. Svejcar LN,
    7. Breed MF,
    8. Faist AM,
    9. Harrison PA,
    10. Curran MF
    , and others. 2021. Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5:1283–1290.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Shipley B
    . 1995. Structured interspecific determinants of specific leaf area in 34 species of herbaceous angiosperms. Functional Ecology 9:312–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    1. Shipley B,
    2. Lechowicz MJ,
    3. Wright I,
    4. Reich PB
    . 2006. Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Ecology 87:535–541.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Smith SE,
    2. Read DJ
    . 2010. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press.
  62. ↵
    1. Stein A,
    2. Gerstner K,
    3. Kreft H
    . 2014. Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecology Letters 17:866–880.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Sundqvist MK,
    2. Sanders NJ,
    3. Wardle DA
    . 2013. Community and ecosystem responses to elevational gradients: Processes, mechanisms, and insights for global change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 44:261–280.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. ↵
    1. Tang J,
    2. Körner C,
    3. Muraoka H,
    4. Piao S,
    5. Shen M,
    6. Thackeray SJ,
    7. Yang X
    . 2016. Emerging opportunities and challenges in phenology: a review. Ecosphere 7:1–17.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Violle C,
    2. Garnier E,
    3. Lecoeur J,
    4. Roumet C,
    5. Podeur C,
    6. Blanchard A,
    7. Navas ML
    . 2009. Competition, traits and resource depletion in plant communities. Oecologia 160:747–755.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Westoby M,
    2. Jurado E,
    3. Leishman MR
    . 1992. Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7:368–372.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Wright IJ,
    2. Reich PB,
    3. Westoby M,
    4. Ackerly DD,
    5. Baruch Z,
    6. Bongers F,
    7. Cavender-Bares J,
    8. Chapin T,
    9. Cornellssen JHC,
    10. Diemer M
    , and others. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    1. Xue R,
    2. Yang Q,
    3. Miao F,
    4. Wang X,
    5. Shen Y
    . 2018. Slope aspect influences plant biomass, soil properties and microbial composition in alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 18:1–12.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Zirbel CR,
    2. Bassett T,
    3. Grman E,
    4. Brudvig LA
    . 2017. Plant functional traits and environmental conditions shape community assembly and ecosystem functioning during restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 54:1070–1079.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 24 (3)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 24, Issue 3
21 Sep 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fine-scale trait variation of five native forbs along environmental gradients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Fine-scale trait variation of five native forbs along environmental gradients
Sasha Victor, Kyle Doherty, Mary Ellyn DuPre, Philip W Ramsey, Ylva Lekberg
Native Plants Journal Sep 2023, 24 (3) 192-205; DOI: 10.3368/npj.24.3.192

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Fine-scale trait variation of five native forbs along environmental gradients
Sasha Victor, Kyle Doherty, Mary Ellyn DuPre, Philip W Ramsey, Ylva Lekberg
Native Plants Journal Sep 2023, 24 (3) 192-205; DOI: 10.3368/npj.24.3.192
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR RESTORATION AND SEED COLLECTION?
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimizing regeneration protocols for native Seeds of Success–collected milkvetch (Astragalus spp.) genetic resources
  • Evaluating native pre-variety germplasms for use in dryland restoration
  • Investigating seed dormancy and germination of important Wyoming forbs
Show more Refereed Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • plant functional traits
  • specific leaf area
  • seed mass
  • seed-transfer zones
  • elevation
  • insolation
  • fungal communities
UW Press logo

© 2026 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire