Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleGeneral Technical

A 16-year case study of bluebunch wheatgrass and Snake River wheatgrass plant materials in Idaho’s Snake River Plain

Derek Tilley and Mary Wolf
Native Plants Journal, June 2023, 24 (2) 106-115; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.24.2.106
Derek Tilley
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Aberdeen Plant Materials Center PO Box 296 Aberdeen, ID 83210
Roles: Plant Materials Center Manager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: derek.tilley{at}usda.gov
Mary Wolf
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Aberdeen Plant Materials Center PO Box 296 Aberdeen, ID 83210
Roles: Plant Materials Center Agronomist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mary.wolf{at}usda.gov
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

While plant material releases have typically undergone some level of testing, long-term comparisons and evaluations are relatively few. Understanding long-term environmental adaptation of species and plant releases is critical for achieving persistent site restoration and rehabilitation. Idaho NRCS established a multi-species display nursery in the semi-arid Snake River Plain at Orchard, Idaho, in 2004. The display nursery included 9 entries of bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) Á. Löve [Poaceae]) and 4 entries of Snake River wheatgrass (Elymus wawawaiensis J. Carlson & Barkworth [Poaceae]), which were evaluated yearly for plant density from 2005 through 2008, and again in 2021. In this non-replicated case study, we found several bluebunch and Snake River wheatgrass accessions and releases adapted to local site conditions while not being of local origin. Our observations further support the commonly accepted belief that Anatone bluebunch wheatgrass is better adapted to lower precipitation areas than ‘Goldar’. We did not see evidence that Snake River wheatgrass was more drought tolerant than bluebunch releases at the Orchard study site, but rather, we saw significant variation among releases or accessions of each species.

  • long-term persistence
  • adaptation
  • range
  • grass
  • seed transfer
  • Poaceae
Figure

The Aberdeen Plant Materials Center established a display nursery near Orchard, Idaho, in 2004 to showcase and compare adapted plant materials. Included in the display were 9 bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) Á. Löve [Poaceae]) and 4 Snake River wheatgrass (Elymus wawawaiensis J. Carlson & Barkworth [Poaceae]) entries.

Promising plant materials can undergo a wide range of evaluation protocols during development depending on the class of release targeted. Historically, cultivar releases have been subjected to replicated testing at multiple sites over 2 or more generations spanning 7 to 11 y on average (USDA NRCS 2010), while pre-varietal germplasms (PVG) are evaluated to a much lesser extent (DePue and Englert 2015). For example, selected class germplasms may be evaluated for only 1 to 2 y of a single generation prior to release as illustrated by Tilley (2015) or for 3 to 6 y in some cases (LeFebvre and others 2017), whereas a source-identified release is made from a naturally growing population occupying a known or defined geographic area with minimal or no selection or testing of the parent population (USDA NRCS 2004, 2010).

Despite the time invested in the development of many plant material releases, observations lasting beyond a handful of years are few. This limited information may lead to an incomplete understanding of the scope of adaptation of plant materials being used across a broad spatial range. Conditions in the semi-arid sagebrush steppe ecosystem in the Snake River Plain of western North America, for example, are highly variable. Temperatures can range from –40 °C (–40 °F) in winter to 40 °C (104 °F) in summer (Caldwell 1985), and normal precipitation ranges from 125 to >300 mm (5–12 in) (McNab 1996). The majority of precipitation falls as snow in winter and spring, outside of the growing season (Smith and others 2012), and plant growth depends largely on soil water accumulated over the previous winter (Comstock and Ehleringer 1992). Swings in temperatures and precipitation, as well as fungal or insect outbreaks, may not be captured in short-term studies, and their impact on test materials can remain undetected prior to release and not become apparent for many years.

Practitioner understanding is increasing in terms of which species have more restricted or broader ecological adaptation; however, many prefer local ecotypes for restoration projects (Aubry and others 2005). Concern arises that the use of non-local ecotypes could result in undesired genetic swamping, outbreeding depression (McKay and others 2013), or restoration failure due to maladaptation to local site conditions (Darris 2001; McKay and others 2013). These concerns may not always be the case (Jones 2013a, 2013b; Jensen and others 2020), however. Manipulated-track releases bred or selected for improved seedling vigor, or natural-track releases originating in harsher environments, may be better adapted to the current conditions of a location relative to the local ecotype that evolved under historical conditions that have since changed. Likewise, genotypic blends and polycrosses of high genetic diversity have been suggested as a form of insurance for broad adaptation in variable or changing environments (Jones and Johnson 1998; Jones and others 2002). While genecological studies and molecular analyses can elucidate genotypic and phenotypic differences between populations, they may not be able to adequately describe long-term fitness in a changing environment. To this end, long-term observations of plant material performance remain highly valuable.

Bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) Á. Löve [Poaceae]) (Figure 1) is the dominant bunchgrass throughout much of the Intermountain West’s semi-arid sagebrush steppe (St Clair and others 2013). It is highly palatable and is considered desired forage for a variety of livestock and ungulates (Ogle and others 2010), making it one of the most important grasses to Intermountain rangeland management (USDA FS 1937). Snake River wheatgrass (Elymus wawawaiensis J. Carlson & Barkworth [Poaceae]) is a native of the canyons of the Snake River and its tributaries in Washington, eastern Oregon, and western to northern Idaho. Similar in general appearance to bluebunch wheatgrass, Snake River wheatgrass differs morphologically in having narrower, acuminate (pointed) to aciculate (needle-like) glumes, a more imbricate spike (spikelets overlapping), and glabrate basal leaf sheaths. Snake River wheatgrass was for years misidentified as bluebunch wheatgrass (Barkworth and Carlson 1997), and though it occupies a similar niche, it has been believed to be generally more drought tolerant and to have better establishment in low precipitation areas (Monsen and others 2003; Mukherjee and others 2011). For this reason, it is often recommended as a substitute for bluebunch on drier sites (Ogle and others 2002), even though the site may be outside of the natural range of Snake River wheatgrass. However, this use of Snake River wheatgrass outside its native range may be a concern for those wishing to preserve species composition and distribution. Growing evidence also suggests that Snake River wheatgrass may be more susceptible to reduced water and is naturally limited in distribution to sites of deeper, more fertile soils (Barkworth and Carlson 1997; Jones and others 2021).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Bluebunch wheatgrass is a widely distributed and commonly seeded native perennial bunchgrass in Intermountain rangelands.

These 2 grasses combined are the most broadly seeded native species in the Great Basin in terms of acres covered and volume of seed planted (Gunnell 2021). For example, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources shipped a yearly average of approximately 18,000 kg (40,000 lb) of bluebunch wheatgrass seeds and 15,000 kg (33,000 lb) of Snake River wheatgrass seeds to restoration sites between 2006 and 2019. Over those years, bluebunch and Snake River wheatgrasses combined amounted to 9% of the total shipped seed and 18% of native species (Gunnell 2021).

To effectively match seed source to site, seed transfer zones are being developed using various analyses. Genecological studies examining variation of phenotypic traits in relation to environmental conditions have been used to develop seed transfer guidelines of many restoration species (Johnson and others 2013; St Clair and others 2013; Kramer and others 2015). St Clair and others (2013) proposed 11 seed zones for bluebunch wheatgrass based on plant size, leaf width, and phenology. More recently, Massatti and others (2018) inferred population history from genetic information and proposed 4 large genetic clusters for western North America within which seed transfer might be appropriate.

Released plant materials of both species are widely used by land management agencies, such as USDA Forest Service (FS) and USDI Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and by private landowners and conservation groups. However, long-term plant survival observations are needed to determine which plant materials can persist beyond the initial establishment years and increase and compete on the changing Intermountain landscape. The Orchard Test Site was planted in 2004 in cooperation with the Great Basin Native Plant Selection and Increase Project (GBNPSIP) to allow managers to make side-by-side comparisons of released and experimental materials. The nursery has remained, thanks to management by BLM, and now offers a rare opportunity to observe long-term trends of many materials in semi-arid sagebrush steppe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Orchard Test Site is located in the Snake River Plain of Idaho approximately 37 km (22 mi) southeast of Boise at an elevation of 975 m (3200 ft) (Figure 2) and was selected as representative of conditions in the Snake River Plain ecoregion. Soils at the site are sandy loams of the Lankbush-Chardoton complex (USDA NRCS 2021a). Mean annual precipitation for the location is 290 mm (11.6 in), most of which falls as winter snow (PRISM 2021). The plant community is described by NRCS as a Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis Beetle & Young [Asteraceae])–bluebunch wheatgrass–Thurber’s needlegrass (Achnatherum thurberianum (Piper) Barkworth [Poaceae]) site (USDA NRCS 2021b). The site falls clearly within seed transfer zone 3a (St Clair and others 2013), in which bluebunch wheatgrass plants were shown to be of medium size, to have early phenology, and to feature narrow leaves. The genetic clusters delineated by Massatti and others (2018), however, did not include representatives from the lower Snake River Plain where the Orchard Test Site is located. The site would appear to fall between the Western Great Basin and the Eastern Great Basin metapopulations (Massatti and others 2018).

Figure 2
Figure 2

The Orchard Test Site is located 37 km southeast of Boise in the semi-arid Snake River Plain. Sources: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA FSA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community.

Tested Materials

The Orchard Test Site included 9 entries of bluebunch wheatgrass and 4 of Snake River wheatgrass from plant releases and from test materials provided by the USDA ARS Forage and Range Research Laboratory (ARS) in Logan, Utah (Table 1). Adapted varieties of bluebunch wheatgrass were Anatone Selected Class Germplasm, which is often recommended for use in locations receiving more than 250 mm (10 in) mean annual precipitation, and ‘Goldar’ and P7 Selected Class Germplasm, which are recommended in 300+ mm (12 in) precipitation sites (Ogle and others 2014). Anatone and Goldar were both originally collected in Asotin County, Washington. P-12 and P-15 are predecessor populations of P-24, which would lead to the ARS release Columbia Selected Class Germplasm after an additional breeding cycle (Jones and Mott 2016). The parent population of P-12, P-15, and Columbia was collected near Lind, Washington, in a 250 mm (10 in) precipitation area. P-7 is a multiple-origin polycross of 23 collections and 2 cultivars intended to provide high genetic diversity within a single germplasm (Jones and others 2002). Wahluke is a source-identified germplasm from BFI Native Seeds (2021) collected from a 150 mm (6 in) precipitation site in Franklin County, Washington. Jim Creek is likewise a source-identified germplasm from BFI Native Seeds (2021).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Bluebunch wheatgrass and Snake River wheatgrass plant material entries included in the 2004 Orchard Test Site planting.

Snake River wheatgrass is generally considered to be more drought tolerant than bluebunch wheatgrass in lower precipitation areas (200 to 300 mm) (Ogle and others 2014). The cultivar ‘Secar’ was originally released as bluebunch wheatgrass before further inspection revealed that it belonged to a yet undescribed species. E-26 and E-45 are test materials descended from the cultivar ‘Discovery’ by 1 and 2 cycles of selection, respectively (Jones 2021). SERDP is also a test material that has never been released.

Site Preparation and Implementation

BLM conducted a prescribed burn over the site during fall 2002. The site was later treated in May 2003 and May 2004 with 4.7 l of glyphosate and 2.35 l of 2,4-D per ha to reduce weed cover and prepare a suitable seedbed for planting. Given limited breakdown of dead grass clumps that would inhibit proper seed placement with a drill, and to ensure a clean seedbed, the planting site was cultivated with a cultipacker just prior to seeding to a depth of approximately 5 cm (2 in).

The trial was planted as a fall-dormant seeding on 16 November 2004, using a modified Tye Drill with a width of 2.0 m (80 in) configured with 8 spouts at 0.25 m (10 in) spacing. Each plot is 2.0 m (80 in) wide and 18.3 m (60 ft) in length. Seeding depths and rates followed Ogle and others (2011) and NRCS Idaho practice standards, which target a seeding depth of 13 to 19 mm (0.5–0.75 in) and a seeding rate of 270 to 320 pure live seeds (PLS) per m2 (25–30 PLS/ft2) for both species. Pure live seed values were determined by seed laboratory results. We mixed all seed with rice hulls as an inert carrier to improve seed flow following St John and others (2005). No supplemental irrigation or fertilizer was applied at any time. The test site was excluded from livestock grazing to allow visitors to view mature plants and to allow observation of plant response to environmental conditions alone.

During the first evaluation (2005), most plots contained high densities of Russian thistle (Salsola L. [Chenopodiaceae]) and moderate amounts of bur buttercup (Ranunculus testiculatus Crantz [Ranunculaceae]). Russian thistle plants were approximately 5.0 to 7.6 cm (2–3 in) tall, and the buttercup plants had already flowered. Plots seeded to grasses were consequently sprayed on 9 June 2005 with 1.2 l of 2,4-D and 0.6 l of dicamba per ha to control broadleaf weeds. At the time of the second evaluation (2006), there was a heavy infestation of tumble mustard (Sisymbrium altissimum L. [Brassicaceae]); however, no further weed control measures were taken for the duration of the trial.

Analysis

Given that bluebunch wheatgrass and Snake River wheatgrass are often treated as interchangeable by restorationists, we analyzed both species together and not as separate identities. We evaluated plant density by counting the number of individual plants with at least some rooted material within a 1 m2 frame at 2 m (80 in) intervals starting at the northern end of each plot, for a total of 5 frames per plot. Canopy cover was ocularly estimated using the same 5 frames. Plant density data were collected yearly in early to midsummer from 2005 through 2008 and again in 2021. Canopy cover was evaluated on 2 April 2021.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Annual and long-term average (1981–2010) precipitation for the Orchard Test Site, Idaho (PRISM 2021).

The site was planted as a display nursery and not a replicated trial, so true blocks and replications were not possible for more rigorous statistical analysis. Because the plots were located adjacent to one another, however, some degree of site condition uniformity between plots (soil, slope, received precipitation) can be assumed. We treated the 5 frames as pseudo-replications to generate means and standard errors as an indicator of variation within the plot. Furthermore, the original demonstration design did not include wide border spaces to prevent contamination from adjacent plots. Evaluation frames were placed in the middle of each plot, approximately 0.5 m (1.6 ft) from the nearest neighboring plants from a different entry; however, migration of accessions via seed dispersal is possible. Data presented here should be viewed therefore as a case study and not as a scientific experiment. Conclusions should not be viewed as definitive.

Weather

Precipitation data were obtained from PRISM (2021). Average annual precipitation for the 2004–2020 study period was 304 mm (12.0 in), slightly above the long-term (1981–2010) average of 294 mm (11.6 in). We show annual and long-term average precipitation in Figure 3. The first 3 y of the study received near- or above-average precipitation, 276 to 332 mm (11–13 in). Five years of the study received less than 250 mm, with 2013 being the driest year at 179 mm (7 in). Precipitation exceeded 380 mm (15 in) in 4 y of the study. The wettest year was 2010, with a total of 420 mm (17 in).

We obtained daily high and low temperatures and long-term (1981–2010) monthly average minimum, mean, and maximum temperatures from PRISM (2021). We show long-term monthly averages in Figure 4. The coldest monthly mean minimum temperature, –6.1 °C (21 °F), occurs in December, and the highest monthly mean maximum temperature, 32.8 °C (91 °F) occurs in July. Across the duration of this study, yearly extreme low temperatures for the Orchard Test Site ranged from –29 °C (–20 °F) in 2017 to –12.5 °C (10 °F) in 2020. Winter temperatures below –17 °C (0 °F) occurred in more than half of the years of the study. Summer temperatures reached or exceeded 38 °C (100 °F) in every year of the study. The highest maximum temperature was 44.2 °C (112 °F) in 2013. Temperatures greater than 42 °C (108 °F) occurred in 5 y of the study.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Monthly average maximum, minimum, and mean temperatures for the Orchard Test Site, Idaho (PRISM 2021).

Figure 5
Figure 5

Average plant density of 13 bluebunch and Snake River wheatgrass accessions at Orchard, Idaho, for years 2005–2008 derived from 5 pseudo-replications within each non-replicated plot. Error bars indicate ±1 standard error.

RESULTS

2005–2008

P-12, P-24, and Wahluke bluebunch wheatgrass accessions scored the highest average plant density in the establishment year with 17.2, 13.8, and 13.6 plants/m2, respectively (Figure 5). Snake River wheatgrass accession E-45 had the highest establishment of the species with 15.6 plants/m2. The lowest plant densities in the establishment year were from E-26 Snake River wheatgrass (2.2 plants/m2), along with Goldar and P-5 bluebunch wheatgrass with 4.0 and 6.6 plants/m2, respectively. In general, plant density of most accessions decreased from 2005 through 2008, with the greatest decrease in density occurring between the first and second years. Plant densities declined among all entries from 2005 to 2006 except for Jim Creek bluebunch wheatgrass, which remained constant at 11.0 plants/m2. Many accessions dropped significantly in density in the first year. For example, P-5 bluebunch wheatgrass decreased approximately 45% between 2005 and 2006. Following the declines in density in the first year of establishment, plant densities for most accessions remained somewhat steady between 2006 and 2008. In 2008, 4 y after establishment, the highest plant densities were observed for the source-identified bluebunch wheatgrass releases Wahluke and Jim Creek (both 10.2 plants/m2).

2021

Plant density data measured 16 y after planting varied from 1.2 to 7.4 plants/m2 (Figure 6), indicating some entries may be better adapted to long-term conditions at Orchard than others. Likewise, some releases showed superior long-term persistence to those that had better early establishment. Three entries, all bluebunch wheatgrass, had densities greater than 5 plants/m2 after 16 y, P-24, P-12, and Anatone with 7.4, 6.8, and 5.4 plants/m2, respectively. Goldar, which is reputed to be better adapted to higher precipitation sites than other bluebunch releases (Ogle and others 2014), had lower density (4.6 plants/m2) than P-24 and P-12 but was similar in density to Anatone. Among Snake River wheatgrass accessions, Secar, SERDP, and E-45 had mean densities of 5.0, 5.0, and 3.4, respectively. P-5, Wahluke, and E-26 had the lowest plant densities after 16 y with 1.2, 1.2, and 1.4 plants/m2, respectively.

Percent cover values after 16 y averaged 24% among entries, ranging from as much as 44% (P-24) to a low of 8% (Wahluke and P-5) (Figure 7). Snake River wheatgrass accessions E-45 and E-26 appeared to have somewhat larger plants as indicated by low plant densities but relatively high percent cover. All entries except P-5 and Wahluke had cover of greater than 20%.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Plant densities of Snake River wheatgrass and bluebunch wheatgrass accessions in 2021, 16 y after planting. Error bars indicate ±1 standard error.

Figure 7
Figure 7

Canopy cover of Snake River wheatgrass and bluebunch wheatgrass accessions in 2021, 16 y after planting. Error bars indicate ±1 standard error.

DISCUSSION

Plant densities for all accessions trended downward year by year, and we observed no significant increases. We likewise could see no obvious signs of plant recruitment within the plots. Unfortunately, because of the proximity of some of the original seed sources (for example, several of the bluebunch wheatgrass germplasms came from the same region of Washington), definitive identification using genetic markers would be difficult. We cannot state with perfect confidence that the plants examined in the final evaluation were from the original seeding. However, decreasing plant densities and no apparent recruitment or obvious variation in plant age would suggest that the likelihood of cross contamination between plots is low. Conclusions from this non-replicated evaluation should be approached with caution, and extrapolation to broader scale is tenuous.

St Clair and others (2013) found released materials of bluebunch wheatgrass to be more vigorous, more reproductively fecund, and larger in stature when compared to local ecotypes at multiple common-garden locations. Snake River wheatgrass is not indigenous to southern Idaho, so no local Snake River Plain ecotypes could be included in the Orchard display nursery. Nevertheless, we found many bluebunch and Snake River wheatgrass germplasms of non-local origin to be adapted to local conditions. Plant materials with long-term stand persistence, however, were limited to 3 entries. After 16 y, P-24 and P-12, both precursors to Columbia germplasm bluebunch wheatgrass, and Anatone had high plant density.

Anatone originated in seed transfer zone 6a (St Clair and others 2013) and is noted for large plants, early phenology, and narrow leaves. However, this study indicates that this germplasm, although from a different seed transfer zone, is well adapted to conditions at the Orchard site in the semi-arid Snake River Plain (zone 3a: medium plant size, early phenology, and narrow leaf width). P-12 and P-24 originated from Adams County, Washington, in what falls in zone 3a. Based on St Clair and others’ (2013) seed transfer zones, these would be expected to do well at Orchard, also a 3a site. However, P-12 and P-24 hail from what Massatti and others (2018) described as the Palouse/Wallowa genetic cluster, which was distinct from the Snake River Plain genotypes of the 2 Great Basin genetic clusters. This finding would indicate that while being from a distinctly different genetic cluster, at least some materials from the Palouse/Wallowa cluster can be well adapted to the Snake River Plain.

Our results did not support the notion that Snake River wheatgrass is more drought tolerant or establishes better than bluebunch wheatgrass in semi-arid rangeland. Establishment and persistence of Secar, the only formally released Snake River wheatgrass tested, was similar to that of bluebunch wheatgrass releases. Secar has been described as one of the most drought-tolerant native perennial grasses available and is able to survive in sites receiving as little as 200 mm (7.9 in) of precipitation annually (Ogle and others 2002). Our results indicate that suitable bluebunch wheatgrass alternatives can perform equally well under the semi-arid conditions of southwestern Idaho, specifically on sites receiving greater than 290 mm (11.4 in) of annual precipitation.

NRCS guidelines indicate that suitable plant densities of rangeland seedings in sites with loamy soils receiving <300 mm (<12 in) mean annual precipitation should range between 5.4 and 16.1 plants/m2 (0.5 and 1.5 plants/ft2) (Ogle and others 2011). Based on these parameters, numerous materials tested showed adequate densities for the first 4 y (SERDP, P-12, P-7, Wahluke, Jim Creek, P-24, and Anatone); however, only P-24, Anatone, and P-12 would be considered successful after 16 y. BLM Twin Falls District standards indicate a successful mature stand with >3 deep-rooted perennial grasses/m2 (Jirik 2022). Based on these criteria, all entries save E-26, P-5, and Wahluke would meet the standard of success at 16-y post seeding.

Canopy cover is not commonly used to assess rangeland health as it is seen by many researchers as too variable in plant size due to yearly precipitation; however, it can be useful in comparing performance among ecotypes. Differences in plant size among releases and accessions make it possible to achieve desired cover objectives with lower plant densities, that is, larger, more robust plants may create adequate cover with fewer numbers. This finding would indicate that density alone might not be sufficient as an indicator of adaptation. Some agency-specific goals have been suggested, but these can vary widely by management objectives and local environmental conditions. For sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus Bonaparte [Phasianidae]) nesting habitat in sagebrush steppe, for example, BLM recommends ≥ 10% cover from native bunchgrasses (USDI BLM 2019). Other restoration projects, such as that of the Soda fire in southwestern Idaho, have targeted that foliar cover of large-statured perennial grasses (excluding Sandberg bluegrass) should meet an average of greater than or equal to 20% (Jirik 2022). By both standards, 11 of the 13 evaluated entries produced adequate cover 16 y after planting, including some entries that had relatively low plant density (for example, E-26).

CONCLUSION

Data from the Orchard Test Site would seem to indicate that plant materials of bluebunch wheatgrass and Snake River wheatgrass vary as much or more than the 2 species vary themselves. These results align with those of target-neighbor trials conducted by Jones and others (2021) wherein bluebunch and Snake River wheatgrass seedlings were grown with an annual grass neighbor. We saw a wide range of plant density and canopy cover among entries at the Orchard Test Site, both long- and short-term, indicating a range of phenotypes for both species (Figure 8). We found several bluebunch and Snake River wheatgrass accessions and releases adapted to the long-term site conditions despite originating from distinctly different recommended seed transfer zones than that of the planting site. Our results further suggest that Anatone bluebunch wheatgrass may be better adapted than Goldar to lower precipitation areas. We did not see evidence that Snake River wheatgrass was more drought tolerant than bluebunch releases at the Orchard Test Site, but rather we saw significant variation among releases or accessions. Greater differences in adaptation between the 2 species may be more apparent at lower precipitation sites. More long-term studies examining adaptation of specific germplasm sources to specific conditions of the various seed zones or ecoregions are needed to elucidate adaptation (St Clair and Johnson 2004). Ultimately, understanding the adaptive limitations of specific plant releases may be more informative than generalized seed transfer zones for making seeding recommendations and decisions.

Figure 8
Figure 8

A healthy stand of bluebunch wheatgrass and Snake River wheatgrass at Orchard, Idaho, 16 y after planting.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the BLM for providing the Orchard Test Site and fencing. We also thank the Great Basin Native Plant Selection and Increase Project (GBNPSIP) for partially funding this project. Finally, the authors thank Tom Jones for his thoughtful review and suggestions.

Footnotes

  • NOMENCLATURE

    USDA NRCS (2022)

  • Photos by Derek Tilley, NRCS

This article was prepared by a U.S. government employee as part of the employee’s official duties and is in the public domain in the United States.

REFERENCES

    1. Alderson J,
    2. Sharp WC
    . 1994. Grass varieties in the United States. USDA Soil Conservation Service. Agriculture Handbook No. 170. 296 p.
  1. ↵
    1. Aubry C,
    2. Shoal R,
    3. Erickson V
    . 2005. Grass cultivars: their origins, development, and use on national forests and grasslands in the Pacific Northwest. Olympia (WA): USDA Forest Service. 55 p.
  2. ↵
    1. Barkworth ME,
    2. Carlson JR
    . 1997. Elymus wawawaiensis: a species hitherto confused with Pseudoroegneria spicata (Triticeae, Poaceae). Phytologia 83:312–330.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    BFI Native Seeds. 2021. URL: http://bfinativeseeds.com (accessed 12 Apr 2021). Moses Lake (WA).
  4. ↵
    1. Caldwell MM
    . 1985. Cold desert. In: Chabot BF, Mooney HA, editors. Physiological ecology of North American plant communities. New York (NY): Chapman and Hall. p 198–212.
  5. ↵
    1. Comstock JP,
    2. Ehleringer JR
    . 1992. Plant adaptation in the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau. Great Basin Naturalist 52(3):195–215.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Darris D
    . 2001. ‘Arlington’ and ‘Elkton’ blue wildrye. Corvallis (OR): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2 p.
  7. ↵
    1. DePue JA,
    2. Englert JM
    . 2015. Improved conservation plant materials released by NRCS and Cooperators through December 2014. Beltsville (MD): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 71 p.
  8. ↵
    1. Gunnell K
    . 2021. Personal communication. Ephraim (UT): Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Great Basin Research Center. GRBC Coordinator.
  9. ↵
    1. Jensen S,
    2. Anderson VJ,
    3. Christensen W,
    4. Roundy B,
    5. Kitchen S,
    6. Allphin L
    . 2020. Does basin wildrye (Leymus cinereus) show local adaptation when deployed according to generalized seed zones in the Central Basin and Range ecoregion? Native Plants Journal 22(2):112–122.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Jirik S
    . 2022. Personal communication. Boise (ID): USDI Bureau of Land Management. Post Fire Recovery & Noxious Weed Program Lead.
  11. ↵
    1. Johnson RC,
    2. Helier BC,
    3. Vance-Borland KW
    . 2013. Genecology and seed zones for tapertip onion in the US Great Basin. Botany 91:686–694.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Jones TA
    . 2013a. When local isn’t best. Evolutionary Applications 6(7):1109–1118.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Jones TA
    . 2013b. Ecologically appropriate plant materials for restoration applications. BioScience 63(3):211–219.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Jones TA
    . 2021. Personal communication. Logan (UT): USDA Agricultural Research Service. Forage and Range Research Laboratory. Research Geneticist (Plants).
  15. ↵
    1. Jones TA,
    2. Johnson DA
    . 1998. Integrating genetic concepts into planning rangeland seedings. Journal of Range Management 51(6):594–606.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Jones TA,
    2. Mott IW
    . 2016. Notice of release of Columbia Germplasm of bluebunch wheatgrass. Native Plants Journal 17(1):53–58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Jones TA,
    2. Larson SR,
    3. Nielson DC,
    4. Young SA,
    5. Chatterton NJ,
    6. Palazzo AJ
    . 2002. Registration of P-7 bluebunch wheatgrass germplasm. Crop Science 42(5):1754–1755.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Jones TA,
    2. Bell BP,
    3. Monaco TA
    . 2021. Perennial grass seedlings modify biomass and physiological traits in response to an annual grass neighbor. Rangeland Ecology and Management 77(1):93–100.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Kramer AT,
    2. Larkin DJ,
    3. Fant JB
    . 2015. Assessing potential seed transfer zones for five forb species from the Great Basin Floristic Region. Natural Areas Journal 35(1):174–188.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. LeFebvre J,
    2. Scianna J,
    3. Pokorny M
    . 2017. Notice of release of Stucky Ridge Germplasm silverleaf Phacelia. Bridger (MT): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 10 p.
  21. ↵
    1. Massatti R,
    2. Prendeville HR,
    3. Larson S,
    4. Richardson BA,
    5. Waldron B,
    6. Kilkenny FF
    . 2018. Population history provides foundational knowledge for utilizing and developing native plant restoration materials. Evolutionary Applications 11:2025–2039.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. McKay JK,
    2. Christian CE,
    3. Harrison S,
    4. Rice KJ
    . 2013. “How local is local?” A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13(3):432–440.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. McNab WH
    . 1996. Ecological subregions of the United States. URL: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/pubs/ecoregions/ch48.html (accessed 9 Aug 2022). USDA Forest Service.
  24. ↵
    1. Monsen SB,
    2. Kitchen SG,
    3. Memmott K,
    4. Shaw N,
    5. Pellant M,
    6. Young S,
    7. Ogle D,
    8. St John L
    . 2003. Notice to release Anatone germplasm bluebunch wheatgrass (selected class natural population). Provo (UT): USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station, Shrub Sciences Laboratory. 45 p.
  25. ↵
    1. Mukherjee JR,
    2. Jones TA,
    3. Adler PB,
    4. Monaco TA
    . 2011. Drought tolerance in two perennial bunchgrasses used for restoration in the Intermountain West, USA. Plant Ecology 21:461–470.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Ogle D,
    2. Stannard M,
    3. Jones TA
    . 2002. Plant guide for Snake River wheatgrass (Elymus wawawaiensis). Boise (ID): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 4 p.
  27. ↵
    1. Ogle DG,
    2. St John L,
    3. Jones TA
    . 2010. Plant guide for bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata). Boise (ID): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 5 p.
  28. ↵
    1. Ogle D,
    2. St John L,
    3. Stannard M,
    4. Brazee B
    . 2011. Guidelines for determining stand establishment on pasture, range and conservation seedings. Technical Note No. 12. Boise (ID): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 8 p.
  29. ↵
    1. Ogle D,
    2. St John L,
    3. Stannard M,
    4. Holzworth L
    . 2014. Grass, grass-like, forb, legume and woody species for the Intermountain West. Technical Note No. 24. Boise (ID), Bozeman (MT), Spokane (WA): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 41 p.
  30. ↵
    [PRISM] Parameter-elevation regressions on independent slopes model. 2021. URL: http://prism.oregonstate.edu (accessed 19 Oct 2021). PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University.
  31. ↵
    1. Smith SD,
    2. Monson RK,
    3. Anderson JE
    . 2012. Physiological ecology of North American desert plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media. 288 p.
  32. ↵
    1. St Clair B,
    2. Johnson R
    . 2004. Structure of genetic variation and implications for the management of seed and planting stock. USDA Forest Service Proceedings. RMRS-P-33. p 64–71.
  33. ↵
    1. St Clair JB,
    2. Kilkenny F,
    3. Johnson R,
    4. Shaw N,
    5. Weaver G
    . 2013. Genetic variation in adaptive traits and transfer zones for Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) in the northwestern United States. Evolutionary Applications 6(3):933–948.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. St John L,
    2. Ogle D,
    3. Tilley D,
    4. Majerus M,
    5. Holzworth L
    . 2005. Mixing seed with rice hulls. Technical Note No. 7. Boise (ID): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 14 p.
  35. ↵
    1. Tilley DJ
    . 2015. Notice of release of Amethyst Germplasm hoary tansyaster: selected class of natural germplasm. Native Plants Journal 16(1):54–60. https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.16.1.54
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    [USDA FS] USDA Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office.
  37. ↵
    [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2004. Notice of release of Newberry Germplasm Indiangrass. Americus (GA): Jimmy Carter Plant Materials Center. 21 p.
  38. ↵
    [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. National plant materials manual. 4th ed. Washington (DC). 380 p.
  39. ↵
    [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2021a. Custom soil resource report for Ada County Area. Web Soil Survey. URL: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/ (accessed 8 Apr 2021).
  40. ↵
    [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2021b. Field office technical guide. URL: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/technical/fotg/ (accessed 9 Apr 2021).
  41. ↵
    [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2022. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 9 Sep 2020). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
  42. [USDA SCS] USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1989. Notice of release of ‘Goldar’ bluebunch wheatgrass. Boise (ID). 7 p.
  43. ↵
    [USDI BLM] USDI Bureau of Land Management. 2019. Nevada and Northeastern California Greater sage-grouse record of decision and approved resource management plan amendment. Reno (NV): BLM Nevada State Office. 83 p.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 24 (2)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 24, Issue 2
20 Jun 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A 16-year case study of bluebunch wheatgrass and Snake River wheatgrass plant materials in Idaho’s Snake River Plain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
A 16-year case study of bluebunch wheatgrass and Snake River wheatgrass plant materials in Idaho’s Snake River Plain
Derek Tilley, Mary Wolf
Native Plants Journal Jun 2023, 24 (2) 106-115; DOI: 10.3368/npj.24.2.106

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A 16-year case study of bluebunch wheatgrass and Snake River wheatgrass plant materials in Idaho’s Snake River Plain
Derek Tilley, Mary Wolf
Native Plants Journal Jun 2023, 24 (2) 106-115; DOI: 10.3368/npj.24.2.106
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A collaborative approach to collecting native early season milkweeds in California for monarch butterfly habitat restoration
  • Growing the state endemic, Oregon semaphoregrass (Pleuropogon oregonus)
Show more General Technical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • long-term persistence
  • adaptation
  • range
  • grass
  • seed transfer
  • Poaceae
UW Press logo

© 2026 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire