Native and introduced ornamental bunchgrass seedling response to restricted soil-moisture conditions

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Bayat B,
   2. Van der Tol C,
   3. Verhoef W.

   2016. Remote sensing and grass response to drought stress using spectroscopic techniques and canopy reflectance model inversion. Remote Sensing 8:557.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Cabrera RI,
   2. Wagner KL,
   3. Wherley B.

   2013. An evaluation of urban landscape water use in Texas. Texas Water Journal 4:14–27.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Calado JM,
   2. Basch G,
   3. Barros JF,
   4. Carvalho M.

   2013. Weed emergence as affected by soil disturbance and moisture in a controlled environment. Plant Protection Quarterly 28:6–11.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Caldwell MM,
   2. Dean TJ,
   3. Nowak RS,
   4. Dzurec RS,
   5. Richards JH.

   1983. Bunchgrass architecture, light interception, and water-use efficiency: assessment by fiber optic point quadrats and gas exchange. Oecologia 59:178–184.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Cathey SE,
   2. Kruse JK,
   3. Sinclair TR,
   4. Dukes MD.

   2011. Tolerance of three warm-season turfgrasses to increasing and prolonged soil water deficit. HortScience 46:1550–1555.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Cathey SE,
   2. Kruse JK,
   3. Sinclair TR,
   4. Dukes MD.

   2013. Transpiration and visual appearance of warm season turfgrasses during soil drying. Environmental and Experimental Botany 89:36–43.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Davies KW,
   2. Johnson DD.

   2017. Established perennial vegetation provides high resistance to reinvasion by exotic annual grasses. Rangeland Ecology & Management 70:748–754.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Fettinger JL,
   2. Harper CA,
   3. Dixon CE.

   2002. Invertebrate availability for upland game birds in tall fescue and native warm-season grass fields. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 77:83–87.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Ghannoum O.

   2009. C4 photosynthesis and water stress. Annals of Botany 103:635–644.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    1. Hamerlynck EP,
    2. Scott RL,
    3. Cavanaugh ML,
    4. Barron-Gafford G.

    2014. Water use efficiency of annual-dominated and bunchgrass-dominated savanna intercanopy space. Ecohydrology 7:1208–1215.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Hamerlynck EP,
    2. Smith BS,
    3. Sheley RL,
    4. Svejcar TJ.

    2016. Compensatory photosynthesis, water-use efficiency, and biomass allocation of defoliated exotic and native bunchgrass seedlings. Rangeland Ecology & Management 69:206–214.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Harris-Shultz K,
    2. Harrison M,
    3. Wadl PA,
    4. Trigiano RN,
    5. Rinehart T.

    2015. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for a little bluestem collection. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 140:78–87.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Hatfield JL,
    2. Sauer TJ,
    3. Prueger JH.

    2001. Managing soils to achieve greater water use efficiency: a review. Agronomy Journal 93:271–280.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Hermitte SM,
    2. Mace RE.

    2012. The grass is always greener … outdoor residential water use in Texas. Texas Water Development Board Technical Note 12-01. Outdoor Residential Water Use in Texas.
15. ↵
    1. Kay CAM,
    2. Rohnke AT,
    3. Sander HA,
    4. Stankowich T,
    5. Fidino M,
    6. Murray MH

    , and others. 2022. Barriers to building wildlife-inclusive cities: insights from the deliberations of urban ecologists, urban planners and landscape designers. People and Nature 4(1):62–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10283

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Kazan K,
    2. Lyons R.

    2016. The link between flowering time and stress tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:47–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    1. Lenz TI,
    2. Moyle-Croft JL,
    3. Facelli JM.

    2003. Direct and indirect effects of exotic annual grasses on species composition of a South Australian grassland. Austral Ecology 28:23–32.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Loflin B,
    2. Loflin S.

    2006. Grasses of the Texas Hill country. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University.
19. ↵
    1. Poulin J,
    2. Weller SG,
    3. Sakai AK.

    2005. Genetic diversity does not affect the invasiveness of fountain grass (Pennisetum setaceum) in Arizona, California and Hawaii. Diversity and Distributions 11:241–247.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Rafi ZN,
    2. Kazemi F,
    3. Tehranifar A.

    2020. Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 48: Article 126563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Salas-Eljatib C,
    2. Fuentes-Ramirez A,
    3. Gregoire TG,
    4. Altamirano A,
    5. Yaitul V.

    2018. A study on the effects of unbalanced data when fitting logistic regression models in ecology. Ecological Indicators 85:502–508.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Schnoor TK,
    2. Mårtensson L-M,
    3. Olsson PA.

    2011. Soil disturbance alters plant community composition and decreases mycorrhizal carbon allocation in a sandy grassland. Oecologia 167:809–819.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. ↵
    1. Shaw RB.

    2012. Guide to Texas grasses. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University.
24. ↵
    1. Sun H,
    2. Kopp K,
    3. Kjelgren R.

    2012. Water-efficient urban landscapes: integrating different water use categorizations and plant types. HortScience 47:254–263.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Takeno K.

    2016. Stress-induced flowering: the third category of flowering response. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:4925–4934.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. 1. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

    . n.d. State environmental agency. Austin (TX). https://www.tceq.texas.gov
27. ↵
    1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

    . 2015. The PLANTS database. URL: https://plants.usda.gov (accessed 6 May 2015). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
28. ↵
    1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service

    . 2021. The PLANTS database. URL: https://plants.usda.gov (accessed 5 Oct 2021). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
29. ↵
    1. Web Soil Survey

    . 2020. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm
30. ↵
    1. Weil RR,
    2. Brady NC.

    2017. The nature and properties of soils. 15th ed. New York (NY): Pearson.
31. 1. WorldClim

    . n.d. Global Climate Data. Online database. http://www.worldclim.com
32. ↵
    1. Yuan X,
    2. Gu M,
    3. Teng W,
    4. Yang X,
    5. Wu J.

    2015. Growth of Calamagrostis brachyticha Steud. and Festuca glauca Lam. and estimated water savings under evapotranspiration-based deficit irrigation. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 86:583–588.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Zaixing L,
    2. Chen F,
    3. Zhu L.

    2013. Variance components testing in ANOVA-type mixed models. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 41:482–496.

    OpenUrl