Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleRefereed Research
Open Access

Native and introduced ornamental bunchgrass seedling response to restricted soil-moisture conditions

Stephanie Gutiérrez, James P Muir, Darrel B Murray, W Brandon Smith and J Randal Bow
Native Plants Journal, March 2023, 24 (1) 18-31; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.24.1.18
Stephanie Gutiérrez
Wildlife and Natural Resources, Tarleton State University, Box T-0050, 13333 W Washington, Stephenville TX 76402
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
James P Muir
Plant Ecology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, 1229 North US 281, Stephenville TX 76401
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Darrel B Murray
Wildlife and Natural Resources, Tarleton State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
W Brandon Smith
Animal Sciences, Auburn University, 231 Upchurch Hall, Auburn AL 36849
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
J Randal Bow
Texas A&M University-Kingsville, 700 University Blvd MSC 218, Kingsville TX 78363
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Ornamental bunchgrasses (Poaceae) before a water treatment in Stephenville, Texas.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Inflorescence color variation of 3 sideoats grama trial plants.

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Mean herbage dry matter yield (DMY) for sideoats grama (SOG; blue), little bluestem (LBS; red), fountaingrass (FG; green), and feather reed grass (FRG; purple) at 4 soil-saturation irrigation levels.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Mean canopy diameter for sideoats grama (SOG; blue), little bluestem (LBS; red), fountaingrass (FG; green), and feather reed grass (FRG; purple) at 4 soil-saturation irrigation levels.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Mean plant heights for sideoats grama (SOG; blue), little bluestem (LBS; red), feather grass (FG; green), and feather reed grass (FRG; purple) at 4 soil-saturation irrigation levels.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Root DMY among species.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Herbage C % among species.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Herbage C yield among species.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Herbage N % among species.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Herbage N yield among species.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Little bluestem (LBS) and sideoats grama (SOG) accession origin data.

    AccessionLatitudeLongitudeMean annual temp (°C)Annual rain (mm)Soil
    LBS
    OK select35.0473−97.872216.1826Zaneis loam
    Cimarron36.7936−102.621612.4418Dalhart fine sandy loam
        911096031.4387−98.3078918.1742Clay loam
        911098730.7831−99.731117.7599Clay loam
        911097830.2084−99.225017.8711Very cobbly clay
        908582233.1419−97.179-17.9902Somervell gravelly loam
        908922929.2684−98.046520.6736Vernia very gravelly loamy sand
        908917629.4201−98.572120.6688Aluf sand
        906446128.8801−99.723321.1559Antoso-Bobillo sand
        909297932.8233−101.433917.3498Olton Clay loam
        909304234.0792−101.252414.7528Manske clay loam
    SOG
    El Reno35.5323−97.955015.3811Norge silt loam
    Vaughn34.6017−105.208311.2327Clovis loam
    Haskell33.1576−99.733717.9633Abilene clay loam
        911230030.6483−97.917618.9822Oakalla silty clay loam
        911206230.8437−99.202917.8667Sunev clay loam
        910792632.0879−98.016917.9796Frio clay loam
        908896128.8661−98.572121.0687Weigang sandy clay loam
        908894828.8314−99.101321.2613Duval loamy fine sand
        909323629.8688−101.161719.8452Zorra clay loam
        911000730.2349−101.800019.2391Dev gravelly loam
        911004930.0000−103.358716.9387Sanmoss-Medley gravelly loam
    • Notes: (°C × 1.8) + 32 = °F

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Root dry matter yield (g/potted plant) of sideoats grama (mean of 11 accessions), little bluestem (mean of 11 accessions), feathergrass, feather reed grass, and pheasant-tail grass (species × water; P ≤ 0.05).

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100502512.5
    Sideoats grama5.4 ab A*7.1 a A2.6 a A2.7 a A1.34
    Little bluestem7.9 a A7.3 a A3.2 a A3.2 a A1.30
    Feather grass7.4 a A4.9 ab A2.9 a A3.4 a A1.34
    Feather reed grass10.5 a A4.3 ab B3.1 a B3.7 a B1.34
    Pheasant tail0.2 b A0.3 b A0.1 a A0.9 a A1.30
        Standard error1.301.341.341.34
    • ↵* Values within each column (lower case) and each row (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Mean bunchgrass inflorescences during trial.

    EntryIrrigation treatment (%)SpikeletsInflorescence shoots
    Feather reed grass5000.3
    Fountaingrass100—2.1
    50—0.3
    Little bluestem10001.7
    5001.0
    2500.3
    Sideoats grama10024.78.5
    5023.24.6
    2520.81.7
    12.514.51.1
    • * Inflorescence shoot values are the average of all harvests including “0.”

      — represents inflorescence where spikelets were difficult to count.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Aboveground herbage dry matter yield (g/potted plant) for 5 bunchgrass species irrigated with 12.5 to 100% soil-saturation every 3 d (species × water P ≤ 0.05; averages of all accessions for sideoats grama and little bluestem).

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100     50     2512.5
    Sideoats grama43.7 a A*   26.7 a B   10.4 a C4.3 a C2.36
    Little bluestem34.1 ab A   16.5 ab B   9.1 a BC2.7 a C2.36
    Fountaingrass27.7 b A   16.3 ab AB   4.4 a BC2.5 a C2.49
    Feather reed grass25.9 b A   12.9 bc B   3.2 a B2.2 a B2.49
    Pheasant tail0.7 c A   0.9 c A   1.0 a A1.1 a A2.36
        Standard error2.36   2.49   2.362.49
    • ↵* Values within each column (lower case) and each row (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Herbage dry matter yield (DMY) (g/plant) among accessions of little bluestem and sideoats grama averaged over 4 levels of irrigation (accession × irrigation; P > 0.05).

    Little bluestemHerbage DMY (g/plant)Sideoats gramaHerbage DMY (g/plant)
    908922917.3 a* A911206221.3 a A
    OK Select16.2 a AB908894819.4 ab AB
    906446115.6 ab AB908896118.9 ab AB
    Cimarron15.5 abc AB911000718.5 ab ABC
    908917614.9 abc ABC910792618.2 ab ABC
    911098713.9 abc BCD911004917.7 ab BC
    911097813.6 abc BCDHaskell17.5 ab BC
    911096013.5 abc BCDEl Reno16.7 ab BC
    908582212.0 bc CDVaughn16.1 b BC
    909297911.7 bc CD909323615.4 b BC
    909304211.4 c D911230014.8 b C
        Standard error          1.57          1.58
    • ↵* Values within each column followed by the same lower-case letter (P ≤ 0.05) upper case letter (P ≤ 0.10) do not differ according to least significant difference multiple means separation test.

    • View popup
    TABLE 6

    Canopy diameter (cm/potted plant) among 5 bunchgrass species at 4 irrigation levels (species × irrigation P ≤ 0.05; averages of all accessions for sideoats grama and little bluestem).

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100502512.5
    Sideoats grama50.3 b A*42.6 b A29.2 a A29.1 a A4.92
    Little bluestem40.0 b A34.7 b A27.5 a A25.9 a A4.92
    Fountaingrass52.7 ab AB58.0 ab A36.3 a AB30.0 a B4.92
    Feather reed grass77.3 a A71.0 a A51.3 a AB43.3 a B4.92
    Pheasant tail45.7 b A31.7 b A43.7 a A40.0 a A4.92
        Standard error4.924.924.924.92
    • ↵* Values within each column (lower case) and each line (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

    • View popup
    TABLE 7

    Canopy diameter (cm) among little bluestem and sideoats grama accessions averaged over 4 levels of soil-saturation (accession × irrigation P > 0.05).

    Little bluestemCanopy diameter (cm)Sideoats gramaCanopy diameter (cm)
    9089229   32.83 abc*911206237.42 a
    OK Select 35.33 ab908894836.83 a
    906446140.17 a908896137.17 a
    Cimarron  32.17 abc911000732.33 a
    9089176 33.71 ab910792641.83 a
    9110987 33.83 ab911004934.75 a
    9110978  32.67 abcHaskell37.17 a
    9110960 33.58 abEl Reno39.92 a
    9085822 29.83 bcVaughn36.92 a
    909297924.21 c909323643.50 a
    909304224.13 c911230038.03 a
        Standard error1.962.56
    • ↵* Values within each column followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test. 1 cm = 0.4 in

    • View popup
    TABLE 8

    Height (cm/potted plant) among 5 bunchgrass species (species × water; P ≤ 0.05; averages of all accessions for sideoats grama and little bluestem).

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100502512.5
    Sideoats grama44.6 a A*36.3 a A31.4 a A35.1 ab A3.49
    Little bluestem45.9 a A34.9 a AB23.9 a B28.5 ab AB3.49
    Feather grass38.9 ab A36.2 a A20.8 a AB16.8 b B3.49
    Feather reed grass54.4 a A39.7 a AB22.9 a B42.2 a A3.49
    Pheasant tail24.2 b A33.7 a A25.1 a A36.5 a A3.49
        Standard error3.493.493.493.49
    • ↵* Values within each column (lower case) and each row (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

    • View popup
    TABLE 9

    Height (cm) of little bluestem and sideoats grama accessions averaged over 4 irrigation levels (accession × saturation; P > 0.05) in a greenhouse trial.

    Little bluestemHeight (cm)Sideoats gramaHeight (cm)
    9089229  33.5 ab*911206244.4 a
    OK Select 34.3 ab9088948  36.1 bcd
    906446139.0 a9088961  38.9 abc
    Cimarron30.4 b9110007 34.9 cd
    9089176 35.4 ab9107926 34.0 cd
    9110987 35.4 ab9110049   37.0 abcd
    911097828.5 bHaskell 31.7 cd
    9110960 35.9 abEl Reno30.5 d
    9085822 30.9 abVaughn  36.1 bcd
    9092979 32.6 ab9093236  38.9 abc
    909304230.3 b9112300 43.7 ab
        Standard error1.802.00
    • ↵* Values within each column followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test. 1 cm = 0.4 in

  • Root DMY (g/plant) among accessions of LBS and SOG averaged over 4 levels of soil-saturation (accession × saturation; P > 0.05).

    Little bluestem (LBS)Root DMY (g/plant)Sideoats grama (SOG)Root DMY (g/plant)
    9089229 4.82 a*91120624.18 a
    OK Select4.73 a90889484.18 a
    90644614.32 a90889613.80 a
    Cimarron4.90 a91100073.84 a
    90891765.19 a91079263.74 a
    91109875.28 a91100494.27 a
    91109785.13 aHaskell4.06 a
    91109605.39 aEl Reno4.51 a
    90858224.41 aVaughn4.55 a
    90929794.04 a90932364.42 a
    90930424.73 a91123008.21 a
        Standard error0.481.27
    • ↵* Values within each column followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

  • Herbage C (%/potted plant) among 5 bunchgrass species (species × water; P ≤ 0.05) in a greenhouse trial.

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100502512.5
    Sideoats grama41.0 ab A*40.5 a A40.2 a A39.9 ab A.45
    Little bluestem41.5 a A39.8 a A39.3 a A40.7 a A.45
    FG41.1 ab A39.4 a AB39.4 a AB38.2 b B.47
    FRG39.5 ab A38.7 a A39.8 a A39.4 ab A.47
    PTG38.7 b B40.1 a AB41.2 a A41.2 a A.45
        Standard error.47.45.47.45
    • ↵* Values within each column (lower case) and each line (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

  • Herbage C (%) among accessions of LBS and SOG averaged over 4 levels of soil-saturation (accession × saturation; P > 0.05).

    Little bluestemHerbage C (%)Sideoats gramaHerbage C (%)
    908922940.15 ab*911206240.28 a
    OK Select40.67 ab908894840.41 a
    906446141.17 a908896140.64 a
    Cimarron40.73 ab911000740.47 a
    908917640.21 ab910792640.49 a
    911098739.87 ab911004940.70 a
    911097839.60 bHaskell40.28 a
    911096040.83 abEl Reno39.90 a
    908582240.23 abVaughn40.55 a
    909297940.37 ab909323640.58 a
    909304239.82 ab911230040.93 a
        Standard error0.330.39
    • ↵* Values within each column followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

  • Herbage C yield (g/potted plant) among 5 bunchgrass species (species × water; P ≤ 0.05) in a greenhouse trial.

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100502512.5
    Sideoats grama1563.5 a A*902.0 a B298.7 a C137.2 a C65.51
    Little bluestem1299.9 ab A693.6 ab B204.5 a C109.8 a C65.51
    FG967.5 b A725.2 ab A171.9 a B95.4 a B69.16
    FRG1028.0 b A498.8 b B141.4 a BC110.3 a C69.16
    PTG25.6 c A37.7 c A42.5 a A44.2 a A65.51
        Standard error68.4365.5168.4365.51
    • ↵* Values within each column (lower case) and each line (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

  • Herbage N (%/potted plant) among 5 bunchgrass species (species × water; P ≤ 0.05) in a greenhouse trial.

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100502512.5
    Sideoats grama1.3 a B*1.8 bc AB2.3 a A1.3 a B0.14
    Little bluestem1.4 a BC2.0 abc AB2.3 a A0.8 a C0.14
    FG2.0 a AB2.6 a A2.7 a A1.3 a B0.14
    FRG1.4 a B2.5 ab A2.2 a AB0.7 a C0.14
    PTG1.6 a A1.7 c A1.4 b A1.2 a A0.14
        Standard error0.140.140.140.14
    • ↵* Values within each column (lower case) and each line (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

  • Herbage N (%/plant) among accessions of LBS and SOG averaged over 4 levels of soil-saturation (accession × saturation; P > 0.05).

    Little bluestemHerbage N
    (%/plant)
    Sideoats gramaHerbage N
    (%/plant)
    9089229  1.78 ab*91120621.58 a
    OK Select1.42 b90889481.56 a
    9064461 1.60 ab90889611.68 a
    Cimarron1.52 b91100071.59 a
    9089176 1.55 ab91079261.72 a
    9110987 1.66 ab91100491.49 a
    91109781.93 aHaskell1.65 a
    9110960 1.56 abEl Reno1.98 a
    9085822 1.55 abVaughn1.65 a
    90929791.50 b90932361.66 a
    9093042 1.69 ab91123005.15 a
        Standard error0.101.12
    • ↵* Values within each column followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

  • Herbage N yield (g/potted plant) among 5 bunchgrass species (species × water; P ≤ 0.05) in a greenhouse trial.

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100502512.5
    Sideoats grama48.2 a A*40.9 ab A16.9 a B4.4 a B2.56
    Little bluestem42.4 a A34.5 ab A12.1 ab B2.1 a B2.56
    FG45.6 a A46.5 a A11.6 ab B3.3 a B2.70
    FRG37.6 a A31.7 b A7.8 ab B2.0 a B2.70
    PTG1.1 b A1.6 c A1.5 b A1.2 a A2.56
        Standard error2.702.562.702.56
    • ↵* Values within each column (lower case) and each line (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

  • Greatest native accessions plant height (cm) among 5 bunchgrass species (species × water; P ≤ 0.05) in a greenhouse trial.

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100502512.5
    Sideoats grama55.0 a A44.9 a A38.7 a A39.2 a A4.37
    Little bluestem47.3 ab A45.3 a A33.8 a A29.5 a A4.37
    FG38.9 ab A32.8 a A20.8 a A16.8 a A4.63
    FRG54.4 a A39.7 a AB22.9 a B41.2 a AB4.63
    PTG24.2 b A33.7 a A25.1 a A36.5 a A4.37
        Standard error4.374.634.374.63
    • * Values within each column (lower case) and each row (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

  • Greatest native accessions canopy diameter (cm) among 5 bunchgrass species (species × water; P ≤ 0.05) in a greenhouse trial.

    SpeciesSoil saturation %Standard error
    100502512.5
    Sideoats grama56.3 ab A40.0 b AB24.0 a B29.3 a AB5.66
    Little bluestem54.3 ab A47.7 ab AB34.7 a AB24.0 a B5.66
    FG52.7 ab A58.3 ab A36.3 a A30.0 a A5.97
    FRG77.3 a A71.0 a AB51.3 a AB40.8 a B5.97
    PTG45.7 b A31.7 b A43.7 a A40.0 a A5.66
        Standard error5.665.975.665.97
    • * Values within each column (lower case) and each row (upper case) followed by the same letter do not differ (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey-Kramer multiple means separation test.

  • Inflorescence colors.

    Entry # accessionCorresponding speciesRepWater treatmentColor
    4SOG (El Reno)11Red, pink-orange
    4SOG (El Reno)12Pink-orange, pink
    4SOG (El Reno)13Pink
    4SOG (El Reno)14Red
    4SOG (El Reno)23Pink
    4SOG (El Reno)31Tan, red
    4SOG (El Reno)33Red
    5SOG (Vaughn)11Red-orange, red-purple
    5SOG (Vaughn)12Purple
    5SOG (Vaughn)13Pink-orange
    5SOG (Vaughn)14Pink-orange
    5SOG (Vaughn)21Pink-orange
    5SOG (Vaughn)23Red-orange
    5SOG (Vaughn)24Red
    5SOG (Vaughn)31Red-orange, red and pink
    5SOG (Vaughn)32Pink-red-orange, red
    5SOG (Vaughn)34Red-orange
    6SOG (Haskell)11Tan, orange
    6SOG (Haskell)13Red-orange
    6SOG (Haskell)23Purple
    6SOG (Haskell)31Tan, pink
    6SOG (Haskell)32Pink-red-orange, red-purple
    7SOG 911230013Pink
    7SOG 911230021Red-orange
    7SOG 911230023Pink-orange
    7SOG 911230024Pink
    7SOG 911230031Red-orange
    8SOG 911206212Yellow
    8SOG 911206214Purple
    8SOG 911206222Red-orange
    8SOG 911206223Pink
    8SOG 911206231Tan, pink
    8SOG 911206232Red-orange
    9SOG 910792612Tan, pink
    9SOG 910792613Yellow
    9SOG 910792621Tan
    9SOG 910792622Yellow
    9SOG 910792623Yellow
    9SOG 910792631Tan mostly and pink
    10SOG 908896123Pink-orange
    10SOG 908896133Pink-orange
    11SOG 908894811Red-orange
    11SOG 908894814Pink-orange
    11SOG 908894821Red-orange
    11SOG 908894822Pink
    11SOG 908894824Pink-orange
    11SOG 908894831Red-orange, tan
    11SOG 908894832Pink-orange
    11SOG 908894833Red-orange
    12SOG 909323631Light yellow, tan
    13SOG 911000711Pink-orange
    13SOG 911000713Red-orange
    13SOG 911000721Yellow-orange
    13SOG 911000724Pink-orange
    13SOG 911000731Tan, red, pink
    13SOG 911000732Pink-orange
    13SOG 911000733Pink-orange
    13SOG 911000734Red-orange
    14SOG 911004914Pink-orange
    14SOG 911004933Yellow
    1Fountaingrass (FG Pride)31Brown
    16Little Bluestem (Cimarron)14Purple
    18Little Bluestem 911098731Yellow-red, rusty brown
    25Little Bluestem 909304213Yellow
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 24 (1)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 24, Issue 1
20 Mar 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Native and introduced ornamental bunchgrass seedling response to restricted soil-moisture conditions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Native and introduced ornamental bunchgrass seedling response to restricted soil-moisture conditions
Stephanie Gutiérrez, James P Muir, Darrel B Murray, W Brandon Smith, J Randal Bow
Native Plants Journal Mar 2023, 24 (1) 18-31; DOI: 10.3368/npj.24.1.18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Native and introduced ornamental bunchgrass seedling response to restricted soil-moisture conditions
Stephanie Gutiérrez, James P Muir, Darrel B Murray, W Brandon Smith, J Randal Bow
Native Plants Journal Mar 2023, 24 (1) 18-31; DOI: 10.3368/npj.24.1.18
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • APPENDIX A
    • APPENDIX B
    • APPENDIX C
    • APPENDIX D
    • APPENDIX E
    • APPENDIX F
    • APPENDIX G
    • APPENDIX H
    • APPENDIX I
    • APPENDIX J
    • APPENDIX K
    • APPENDIX L
    • APPENDIX M
    • APPENDIX N
    • APPENDIX O
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Investigating seed dormancy and germination of important Wyoming forbs
  • Performance of 3 Florida native grasses grown in varying container substrates
  • Optimizing regeneration protocols for native Seeds of Success–collected milkvetch (Astragalus spp.) genetic resources
Show more Refereed Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • municipal water restrictions
  • native bunchgrass
  • ornamental bunchgrass
  • irrigation
  • sideoats grama
  • little bluestem
  • Bouteloua curtipendula
  • Schizachyrium scoparium
  • Poaceae
  • USDA NRCS (2015, 2021)
UW Press logo

© 2025 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire