Mapping potential butterfly milkweed (Asclepias tuberosa) habitat in Mississippi using Species Distribution Modeling (SDM) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Brower LP.

   1969. Ecological chemistry. Scientific American 220(2):22–29.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Brower LP,
   2. Taylor OR,
   3. Williams EH,
   4. Slayback DA,
   5. Zubieta RR,
   6. Ramirez MI.

   2012. Decline of monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico: is the migratory phenomenon at risk? Insect Conservation and Diversity 5:95–100.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Cheatham S,
   2. Johnson MC,
   3. Marshall L.

   2000. The useful wild plants of Texas, the southeastern and southwestern United States, the southern plains, and northern Mexico. Vol. 2. Austin (TX): Useful Wild Plants. 599 p.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Delaney JB.

   2017. Personal communication. Jackson (MS): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. State Soil Scientist.
5. ↵
   1. Drackett PR.

   2016. Native milkweed (Asclepias) species common to Mississippi. URL: http://crosbyarboretum.msstate.edu/mississippi-milkweeds (accessed 13 Mar 2017).
6. 1. Drackett PR,
   2. Langlois SA.

   2016. An evaluation of select milkweed species (Asclepias spp.) in South Mississippi. URL: http://crosbyarboretum.msstate.edu/mississippi-milkweeds (accessed 13 March 2017). Picayune (MS): Crosby Arboretum.
7. ↵
   ESRI. 2016. GIS Dictionary. Geographic information system company. URL: https://support.esri.com/en/other-resources/gis-dictionary/term/georeferencing (accessed 27 Mar 2018). Redlands (CA): Environmental Systems Research Institute.
8. ↵
   ESRI. 2020. Understanding the suitability modeling workflow. Geographic information system company. URL: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/analytics/case-studies/understanding-the-suitability-modeling-workflow.htm (accessed 22 Sep 2020). Redlands (CA): Environmental Systems Research Institute.
9. ↵
   1. Gargiullo MB.

   2007. A guide to native plants of the New York City region. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press. 338 p.
10. ↵
    [ITIS] Integrated Taxonomic Information System. 2021. Online database. URL: http://www.itis.gov (accessed 2021). Washington (DC): National Museum of Natural History.
11. ↵
    1. Kindscher K.

    1992. Medicinal wild plants of the prairie. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. 336 p.
12. ↵
    1. Kratsch H,
    2. Olsen S,
    3. Rupp L,
    4. Cardon G,
    5. Heflebower R.

    2008. Soil salinity and ornamental plant selection. Utah State University Cooperative Extension Bulletin HG/Landscaping/2008-02pr.
13. ↵
    1. Lambin EF,
    2. Geist HJ.

    2006. Land-use and land-cover change. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 222 p.
14. ↵
    1. Malcolm SB,
    2. Cockrell BJ,
    3. Brower LP.

    1993. Spring recolonization of eastern North America by the monarch butterfly: successive brood or single sweep migration? In: Malcolm SB, Zalucki MP, editors. Biology and conservation of the monarch butterfly. Los Angeles (CA): Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. p 253–267.
15. ↵
    [MARIS] Mississippi Automated Resource Information System. 2017. What is MARIS? URL: http://www.maris.state.ms.us/HTM/home/Overview.html (accessed 18 Oct 2017).
16. ↵
    Monarch Watch. 2014. The details: monarch populations. URL: https://monarchwatch.org/bring-back-the-monarchs/campaign/the-details/ (accessed 24 May 2018). Bring Back the Monarchs, University of Kansas.
17. ↵
    [MRLC] Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium. 2018. National Land Cover Database (NLCD). URL: https://www.mrlc.gov/index.php (accessed 14 Jun 2018).
18. ↵
    NatureServe. 2020. NatureServe habitat models for imperiled species. URL: https://habitatsuitabilitymodeling-natureserve.hub.arcgis.com/pages/the-map-of-biodiversity-importance (accessed 22 Sep 2020). Arlington (VA).
19. ↵
    1. Pleasants JM,
    2. Oberhauser KS.

    2013. Milkweed loss in agricultural fields because of herbicide use: effect on the monarch butterfly population. Insect Conservation and Diversity 6(2):135–144.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Rohweder JJ,
    2. Thogmartin WE.

    2016. Monarch conservation planning tools. United States Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (UMESC). URL: https://www.umesc.usgs.gov/management/dss/monarch/desktop_monarch_conservation_planning_tools.html (accessed 22 Sep 2020). La Crosse (WI): US Geological Society.
21. ↵
    1. Schulman L,
    2. Toivonen T,
    3. Ruokolainen K.

    2007. Analysing botanical collecting effort in Amazonia and correcting for it in species range estimation. Journal of Biogeography 34(8):1388–1399.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Shafer DJ,
    2. Swannack TM,
    3. Saltus C,
    4. Kaldy JE,
    5. Davis A.

    2016. Development and validation of a habitat suitability model for the non-indigenous seagrass Zostera japonica in North America. Management of Biological Invasions 7(2):141–155.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Shelford VE.

    1931. Some concepts of bioecology. Ecology 12(3):455–467.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    Soil Survey Staff. 2017. Gridded soil survey geographic (gSSURGO) database for Mississippi. URL: http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/ (accessed 22 Sep 2020). USDA NRCS.
25. ↵
    1. Sperduto MB,
    2. Congalton RG.

    1996. Predicting rare orchid (small whorled pogonia) habitat using GIS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62(11):1269–1279.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Store R,
    2. Jokimaki J.

    2003. A GIS-based multi-scale approach to habitat suitability modeling. Ecological Modelling 169:1–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Thogmartin WE,
    2. Diffendorfer JE,
    3. López-Hoffman L,
    4. Oberhauser K,
    5. Pleasants J,
    6. Semmens BX,
    7. Semmens D,
    8. Taylor OR,
    9. Wiederholt R.

    2017. Density estimates of monarch butterflies overwintering in central Mexico. PeerJ 6:23265.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Thomas CD,
    2. Cameron A,
    3. Green RE,
    4. Bakkenes M,
    5. Beaumont LJ,
    6. Collingham YC,
    7. Erasmus BFN,
    8. Ferreira de Siqueira M,
    9. Grainger A,
    10. Hannah L,
    11. Hughes L,
    12. Huntley B,
    13. van Jaarsveld S,
    14. Midgley GF,
    15. Miles L,
    16. Ortega-Huerta M,
    17. Townsend Peterson A,
    18. Philips OL,
    19. Williams SE.

    2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Timme SL.

    1989. Wildflowers of Mississippi. Jackson (MS): University Press of Mississippi. 278 p.
30. ↵
    1. Urquhart FA,
    2. Urquhart NR.

    1976. The overwintering site of the eastern populations of the monarch butterfly (Danaus p. plexippus; Danaidae) in southern Mexico. Journal of the Lepidopterists Society 30(3):153–158.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    [USDA ERS] USDA Economic Research Service. 2020. Land use and land cover estimates for the United States. URL: https://www.ers.usda.gov/about-ers/partnerships/strengthening-statistics-through-the-icars/land-use-and-land-cover-estimates-for-the-united-states/ (accessed 22 Sep 2020). Washington (DC): Economic Research Service.
32. ↵
    [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2018. The PLANTS database. URL: https://plants.usda.gov/ (accessed 7 Jun 2018). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
33. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2018. USDA NRCS monarch butterfly habitat evaluation guide (WHEG), and decision support tool, Midwest edition 2.0 (September 2018). Fort Worth (TX): NRCS Central National Technology Support Center (CNTSC).
34. ↵
    [USGS] United States Geological Survey. 2017. Billions more milkweeds needed to restore monarchs. URL: https://www.usgs.gov/news/billions-more-milkweeds-needed-restore-monarchs (accessed 21 Jun 2017). Reston (VA): Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
35. ↵
    1. Varco JJ.

    2017. Personal communication. Mississippi State (MS): Mississippi State University. Soils Professor.
36. ↵
    Xerces Society. 2015. Monarch conservation. URL: https://xerces.org/monarchs/ (accessed 24 May 2018). Washington (DC): The Xerces Society.