Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleRefereed Research
Open Access

Propagation of beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta) from softwood cuttings

Jessica Jacquelene Hudson, Kimberly Gould, Ann Smreciu and Dani Degenhardt
Native Plants Journal, March 2022, 23 (1) 33-39; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.23.1.33
Jessica Jacquelene Hudson
Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Services 5320 122 Street NW Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5
Roles: Land Reclamation Technologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jessica.hudson{at}nrcan-rncan.gc.ca
Kimberly Gould
Wild Rose Consulting Inc 15109 77 Avenue Edmonton, AB T5R 3B5
Roles: Consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kim.wildrose{at}shaw.ca
Ann Smreciu
Wild Rose Consulting Inc 15109 77 Avenue Edmonton, AB T5R 3B5
Roles: Ecologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wildrose.consulting{at}shaw.ca
Dani Degenhardt
Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Services 5320 122 Street NW Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5
Roles: Research Scientist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dani.degenhardt{at}nrcan-rncan.gc.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta Marshall [Betulaceae]) is a characteristic species of some boreal upland plant communities of northeastern Alberta. This shrub is also a desired species for revegetation following oil sands extraction in the region. Limited seed production and competition from wildlife make harvesting sufficient seeds from natural sites a challenge, therefore vegetative propagation is being investigated. We harvested softwood cuttings from 2 sites in Alberta, Canada, in early July, and we tested 4 treatments (control, bottom heat only, 0.8% IBA (indole-3-butyric acid) only, and 0.8% IBA with bottom heat). Root presence, number of roots, maximum root length, and dry root biomass were measured after 7, 9, and 11 wk post-sticking. Application of IBA (with or without bottom heat) was critical to obtain rooting percentages upward of 65% at 9 wk for one site and 90% at 7 wk for the second site as well as increasing root biomass, maximum length, and number of roots. The impact of bottom heat was negligible on its own, but it enhanced rooting of cuttings from one site when combined with IBA.

KEY WORDS
  • shrub
  • rooting
  • revegetation
  • indole-3-butyric acid
  • root development
  • Betulaceae
NOMENCLATURE
  • USDA NRCS (2020)

CONVERSIONS

  • 1 mm = 0.04 in

  • 1 cm = 0.4 in

  • 1 m = 3.3 ft

  • (°C × 1.8) + 32 = °F

  • 1 mg = 0.00004 oz

In northeastern Alberta, reclamation following resource extraction focuses on establishment of native plant communities that reflect the surrounding boreal forest of the Central Mixedwood Natural Region (Alberta Environment 2010). One such species is Corylus cornuta Marshall (Betulaceae) or beaked hazelnut (USDA NRCS 2020). Beckingham and Archibald (1996) classified it as characteristic of mesic upland communities under a mix of primarily aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx. [Salicaceae]) and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss [Pinaceae]) and is therefore recommended for plant community establishment during reclamation (Alberta Environment 2010). Additional priority is given to species, such as C. cornuta, that are traditionally used by local indigenous communities (Marles and others 2000).

Currently, the conventional method of native boreal shrub establishment is outplanting seedlings grown from locally harvested wild seed. Corylus cornuta is not a prolific seed producer, and although it bears large, high oil content seeds (nuts), they are often preyed upon by wildlife before maturity (Wilkinson 1990). The result is a sporadic and limited supply of seed, which leads to consideration of alternative propagation methods, specifically stem cuttings harvested from a diverse selection of local material.

Few published studies are available for propagation by cuttings of C. cornuta. Based on work by Cartabiano and Lubell (2013), softwood stem cuttings harvested in late spring (June/July), treated with IBA (indole-3-butyric acid), and struck into a peat/vermiculite/perlite mix rooted when the cuttings were kept moist under ideal greenhouse conditions. Similar results were reported by Young (2001). The objective of this study is to evaluate rooting success (root presence, biomass, maximum length, and number of roots) of wild-harvested C. cornuta cuttings using IBA. Bottom heat was added to the trial to avoid stress resulting from possible variations in air temperature. Secondarily, the study aims to refine a protocol for vegetative propagation, including the period required for optimal rooting to occur.

METHODS

We collected plant material for cuttings from 2 sites in Alberta, Canada (Bellis, 54.176944 N, 112.150833 W and Ardrossan, 53.607222 N, 113.125556 W). Two populations were chosen to include some genetic variation, which is an important consideration for resilience when species are included in revegetation projects. Both sites were relatively healthy with good growth. The Bellis site is a rural roadside that is periodically mowed and brush cut; plants are well established and most of the growth is recent (<7 y). The Ardrossan site is an undisturbed, mixedwood forest where the estimated average age of Corylus is 10 y. For the purposes of this study, we harvested only new growth from each site.

Figure

Ardrossan site, June 2019.

Recently elongated stems from spring growth were harvested on 5 July 2020 (Bellis) and 9 July 2020 (Ardrossan), placed in plastic bags, kept cool, and transported to the greenhouse facility where they were stored in bags at 4 °C. We kept material from each site separate for this study. Within 48 h of collection, cuttings were trimmed such that each comprised 2 to 4 exposed nodes (20–30 cm long cuttings). We removed terminal buds and sliced the proximal end of the cutting at approximately 45° to expose a larger portion of the cambium (that is, wounding). Lowermost leaves and buds were removed and remaining leaves aboveground were cut in half to reduce transpiration. Cuttings were kept cool and moist during processing.

The experiment comprised 2 populations and 4 treatments, and sampling occurred at each of 3 intervals (7, 9, and 11 wk). We blocked 25 cuttings per site in each tray of 50. A total of 12 trays were prepared, and 3 were given one of the 4 treatments. We destructively sampled cuttings from a single tray in each treatment at 7, 9, and 11 wk. Treatments consisted of control (no bottom heat or IBA), 0.8% IBA (based on a pilot study), bottom heat, or IBA with bottom heat (IBA+H). For both IBA treatments, the lower 3 to 4 cm of each cutting were dipped in water; then into 0.8% IBA powder (Stim-Root #3); and struck into TerraLink6000610 trays filled with perlite, peat, silica sand, and vermiculite (2:1:1:1 by volume). A depression approximately 5 cm deep was made for the cutting, and the growth medium was moistened and lightly tamped to ensure good cutting–soil contact. For treatments without IBA, each cutting was dipped in water and struck as described above. Bottom heat—provided by Jump Start, Hydrofarm mats and digital temperature controls—was set to 21 °C and maintained an average night soil temperature of 19.8 °C compared to 19.0 °C in the unheated treatment as measured with a ZL6 Logger, Meter Group.

Figure

Site phenotypic differences demonstrated for Bellis cuttings (left) and Ardrossan cuttings (right).

We set air temperature in the greenhouse at 20 °C, with a 16-h photoperiod (combination of natural and grow lights) and 80 to 90% relative humidity (similar to an intermittent misting system set to 10 s every 6 min) (Cartabiano and Lubell 2013). Cuttings were irrigated daily for 10 min with an overhead irrigation system. Insects were controlled with sticky traps, predatory insects, hand removal, or Safer’s miticide/insecticide.

At 7, 9, and 11 wk post-striking, cuttings from a single tray per treatment were carefully removed from the cavity (destructive sampling). We rinsed the roots over a sieve (2 mm pore size, No 10) to collect any root fragments and assessed the belowground portion of each cutting for the following: root presence, maximum root length, number of roots, and callus presence. Roots were removed from the stem using a sharp blade and dried at 40 °C to determine total root biomass. We also counted live (green) axillary shoot buds.

We compared the initial characteristics of struck cuttings (stem diameter, height, and number of nodes) between sites using a linear model and one-way ANOVA. Assumptions were met with either no transformation or a log10+1 transformation. For root variables including total root biomass, number of roots, and maximum root length, data were separated by site and compared among treatments and for each assessment period (7, 9, and 11 wk) using a linear model and a two-way ANOVA. For root, callus, and bud presence, these proportion data were modeled using a generalized linear model (GLM) and binomial family. Further analysis compared root metrics (root biomass, number of roots, and maximum root length) at 9 wk between sites and a subset of treatments (IBA and IBA+H) using linear models and two-way ANOVA. Differences among treatments and sampling intervals were separated with post-hoc multiple comparison tests using emmeans and multcompview (P < 0.05) (Lenth 2018; Selzer 2019). R statistical software was used for all analyses (R Core Development Team 2020).

RESULTS

Cuttings from each site differed phenotypically; those from the Ardrossan population had slightly larger stem diameter and were generally longer as a result of greater axillary shoot bud spacing, compared to those harvested from Bellis (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Aboveground cutting characteristics assessed immediately post-sticking.

Overall, trends in rooting responses for each treatment were similar for both sites (Figure 1). The IBA and IBA+H treatments were more effective at promoting root development in cuttings from both sites than the control or heat alone (Figure 1). Root development of Ardrossan cuttings at 9 wk was generally greater than at 7 wk, but similar to 11 wk (Figure 1). Cuttings from Bellis, however, had shown similar root development across sampling times (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Comparison of root development between treatments after 7, 9, and 11 wk after sticking within each site, Ardrossan and Bellis: a-b) root presence, c-d) number of roots, e-f) root biomass, and g-h) maximum root length. Means ± standard deviation. Letters indicate groups that are significantly different (P <0.05).

Figure

Sample of one row of rooted cuttings at 9 wk from Bellis treated with IBA+H.

Figure

Sample of one row of rooted cuttings at 9 wk from Ardrossan treated with IBA.

More specifically, cuttings from Ardrossan saw the greatest improvement in rooting success with IBA and IBA+H treatments, notably 66 to 76% cuttings rooted with an average of 5 roots per cutting of 4 to 6 cm maximum length at 9 wk, with no significant improvement after 9 wk (Figure 1a, 1c, 1g). When treated with IBA alone, the greatest biomass was measured after 11 wk, whereas when heat is added (IBA+H) the biomass reaches a peak earlier (9 wk) (Figure 1e).

Cuttings from Bellis treated with IBA+H rooted well at 7 wk (to 88%) with no significant improvement (or loss) in percent rooting, number of roots, root length, and biomass at 9 or 11 wk (Figure 1b, 1d. 1f, 1h). Those treated with IBA+H when compared to those treated with IBA had only more roots on average (8 versus 4) at 9 wk (the difference became significant after 11 wk), and significantly greater average biomass (44 versus 19 mg) and root length (9 versus 4 cm) at 9 and 11 wk (Table 2; Figure 1d, 1f, 1h). We observed some decrease in maximum root length after 11 wk and notable deterioration of root quality (that is, root rot).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Root metrics of 9 wk samples compared between sites and a subset of treatments (IBA, IBA+H).

The percentage of cuttings that rooted and (or) produced callus and the number of roots per cutting were similar from each of the 2 sites at 9 wk (Table 2; Figure 2). Although maximum root length and biomass were similar between sites at 9 wk, the addition of heat to IBA treatment improved root biomass and length over IBA alone for the Bellis population only (Table 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Average a) bud survival and b) callus presence of cuttings compared between treatment and Ardrossan and Bellis sites at 9 wk. Means ± standard deviation. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different from each other (P <0.05).

Bud survival varied between cuttings from Bellis and Ardrossan sites. Cuttings from Ardrossan maintained a higher percentage of healthy buds (75%) than did those from Bellis, where bud survival was lowest in cuttings treated with IBA (20%) (Figure 2).

DISCUSSION

Rooting results showed that IBA increased rooting success of local native C. cornuta softwood cuttings (from 2 populations), and this aligned well with findings of Cartabiano and Lubell (2013) for percent rooted cuttings, number of roots, and time required for root development. Our results are also supported by similar findings from Young (2001). Although heat alone did not improve rooting percentages or other root metrics when compared with IBA treatments, the addition of heat to the IBA treatment increased number of roots, root biomass, and root length. Perhaps a greater differentiation of air temperature and substrate temperature (bottom heat) may have led to more noticeable effects on rooting.

Cuttings from Bellis had greater root length and biomass than did those from Ardrossan at 9 wk. The smaller size of these cuttings likely resulted from a more open canopy and disparity in site management. The intermittent mowing and brushing at the Bellis site is similar to the practice of extreme pruning applied to many woody shrub species in horticultural stooling beds to increase the number and quality of softwood cuttings (McDonald 1986; St-Pierre 1997).

The production of callus is a reaction to wounding and an indication of healthy, living tissue. Although callus production is the precursor to rooting in some woody species (especially some conifers), it can be detrimental to root formation in others (Davies and others 2017). The rooting success observed in this study indicates that callus did not limit root formation although we have no indication that the roots derived from the callus itself.

A 9 wk rooting period is recommended to ensure that populations with slower rooting are accommodated. Leaving cuttings for 11 wk did not improve rooting, and we observed a slight reduction in maximum root length at 11 wk, which could be a result of dieback caused by excess moisture. Management of irrigation and misting schedules to allow for drying periods after 4 to 6 wk post-striking (as rooting begins) could mitigate root rot. A possible solution to promote further root growth and avoid root rot is to hotplant (outplanting directly from greenhouse to site without acclimation) after 9 wk or to apply dormancy-inducing conditions to stop root development. Further study will examine bud break and shoot development following dormancy and outplanting.

Generally, multiple branching roots were formed and reached the bottom of the cavity (11.4 cm), yet much of the soil was unoccupied by roots, and the plug did not remain intact the entire depth of the plug after extraction. Smaller containers (shorter, with less volume) could be used in the future to ensure plug stability. Of concern in this study was the reduced bud survival on rooted cuttings from the Bellis population when treated with IBA. Bud survival and bud break are important to establishment success. Hubert (1977) reported that a high humidity environment rather than an open mist system (as was used in this study) was better for bud survival of C. avellana L. Modifications of the greenhouse environment during the rooting period could be tested. Contessa and others (2011) studied C. avellana ‘Tonda Gentile delle Langhe’ and found a respectable balance of root development and bud retention using 1000 mg/l of IBA and 1-MCP (1-Methylcyclopropene) and AgNO3.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of observed differences between populations, an incubation of 9 wk (at 20 °C with 80 to 90% humidity and bottom heat following application of 0.8% IBA) is recommended for softwood cuttings of C. cornuta. Any protocol used must be widely applicable across populations as genetic diversity in the cuttings is important and required for successful reclamation. Improvement is needed to produce a well-rooted plug, and we encourage exploring the combination of treatments and environmental conditions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Robert Vassov from Canadian Natural Resources Limited for his insights and Laura Newstead for site access. Additional thanks to Nathan Smreciu for assistance in cutting harvests.

Footnotes

  • Photos by Jessica Jacquelene Hudson

    This article was prepared by a Canadian government employee as part of the employee’s official duties and is in the public domain in Canada.

This open access article is distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) and is freely available online at: http://npj.uwpress.org

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Alberta Environment. 2010. Guidelines for reclamation to forest vegetation in the Athabasca oil sands region. 2nd ed. Prepared by the Terrestrial Subgroup of the Reclamation Working Group of the Cumulative Environmental Management Association, Fort McMurray, AB.
  2. ↵
    1. Beckingham JD,
    2. Archibald JH.
    1996. Field guide to ecosites of northern Alberta. Natural Resources Canada. Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre. Special Report 5. Edmonton, AB.
  3. ↵
    1. Cartabiano JA,
    2. Lubell JD.
    2013. Propagation of four underused native species from softwood cuttings. HortScience 48(8):1018–1020.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Contessa C,
    2. Valentini N,
    3. Botta R.
    2011. Decreasing the concentration of IBA or combination with ethylene inhibitors improve bud retention in semi-hardwood cuttings of hazelnut cultivar ‘Tonda Gentile delle Langhe’. Scientia Horticulturae 131:103–106.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Davies FT,
    2. Geneve RL,
    3. Wilson SB,
    4. Hartmann HT,
    5. Kester DE.
    2017. Chapter 9: Principles of propagation. In: Hartmann and Kesters’s Plant Propagation Principles and Practices. 9th ed. New York (NY): Pearson Publishing. p 279-343.
  6. ↵
    1. Hubert GE.
    1977. Vegetative propagation of the filbert (Corylus avellana L.) by means of budding and cuttings [MSc thesis]. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University. 68 p.
  7. ↵
    1. Lenth R.
    2018. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.1.
  8. ↵
    1. Marles RJ,
    2. Clavelle C,
    3. Monteleone L,
    4. Tays N,
    5. Burns D.
    2000. Aboriginal plant use in Canada’s northwest boreal forest. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press. 368 p.
  9. ↵
    1. McDonald B.
    1986. Practical woody plant propagation for nursery growers. Portland (OR): Timberline Press. 669 p.
  10. ↵
    R Core Development Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.
  11. ↵
    1. Selzer L.
    2019. multcompview: Visualizations of paired comparisons. R package version 0.1–8.
  12. ↵
    1. St-Pierre RG.
    1997. Growing Saskatoons: a manual for orchardists. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan.
  13. ↵
    [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2020. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 16 Dec 2020). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
  14. ↵
    1. Wilkinson K.
    1990. Beaked hazelnut; wild filbert Corylus cornuta. In: Trees and shrubs of Alberta: a habitat field guide. Edmonton, Alberta: Lone Pine Publishing. p 86–87.
  15. ↵
    1. Young B.
    2001. Propagation protocol for production of container (plug) Corylus cornuta (A. DC.) Sharp plants Treeband #10; San Francisco, California. In: Native Plant Network. URL: https://npn.rngr.net/renderNPNProtocolDetails?selectedProtocolIds=betulaceae-corylus-708 (accessed 29 Dec 2020).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 23 (1)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 23, Issue 1
20 Mar 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Propagation of beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta) from softwood cuttings
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Propagation of beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta) from softwood cuttings
Jessica Jacquelene Hudson, Kimberly Gould, Ann Smreciu, Dani Degenhardt
Native Plants Journal Mar 2022, 23 (1) 33-39; DOI: 10.3368/npj.23.1.33

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Propagation of beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta) from softwood cuttings
Jessica Jacquelene Hudson, Kimberly Gould, Ann Smreciu, Dani Degenhardt
Native Plants Journal Mar 2022, 23 (1) 33-39; DOI: 10.3368/npj.23.1.33
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimizing regeneration protocols for native Seeds of Success–collected milkvetch (Astragalus spp.) genetic resources
  • Evaluating native pre-variety germplasms for use in dryland restoration
  • Investigating seed dormancy and germination of important Wyoming forbs
Show more Refereed Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • shrub
  • rooting
  • revegetation
  • indole-3-butyric acid
  • root development
  • Betulaceae
  • USDA NRCS (2020)
UW Press logo

© 2025 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire