Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleRefereed Research

Conservation and re-establishment of Florida panhandle goldenasters (Chrysopsis): II. Growth and reproduction in response to fertilization within a coastal dune restoration context

Gabriel Campbell-Martínez, Mack Thetford, Debbie Miller and Gina Mangold
Native Plants Journal, September 2021, 22 (3) 323-333; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.22.3.323
Gabriel Campbell-Martínez
University of Florida west Florida Research and Education Center 5988 Highway 90. Building 4900 Milton, FL 32583
Roles: Former Graduate Research Assistant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: camp5595{at}ufl.edu
Mack Thetford
University of Florida West Florida Research and Education Center 5988 Highway 90, Building 4900 Milton, FL 32583
Roles: Associate Professor of Environmental Horticulture
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: thetford{at}ufl.edu
Debbie Miller
University of Florida West Florida Research and Education Center 5988 Highway 90, Building 4900 Milton, FL 32583
Roles: Professor of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: thetford{at}ufl.edu
Gina Mangold
University of Florida West Florida Research and Education Center 5988 Highway 90, Building 4900 Milton, FL 32583
Roles: Undergraduate Research Assistant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: thetford{at}ufl.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Barbier EB,
    2. Hacker SD,
    3. Kennedy C,
    4. Koch EW,
    5. Stier AC,
    6. Silliman BR.
    2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs 81:169–193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Corenblit D,
    2. Steiger J.
    2009. Vegetation as a major conductor of geomorphic changes on the Earth surface: toward evolutionary geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 34:891–896.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Defeo O,
    2. McLachlan A,
    3. Schoeman DS,
    4. Schlacher TA,
    5. Dugan J,
    6. Jones A,
    7. Lastra M,
    8. Scapini F.
    2009. Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 81:1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Deshaies A,
    2. Boudreau S,
    3. Harper KA.
    2009. Assisted revegetation in a subarctic environment: effects of fertilization on the performance of three indigenous plant species. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 41(4):434–441.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Fant JB,
    2. Holmstrom RM,
    3. Sirkin E,
    4. Etterson JR,
    5. Masi S.
    2008. Genetic structure of threatened native populations and propagules used for restoration in a clonal species, American beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata Fern.). Restoration Ecology 16:594–603.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Feagin RA,
    2. Sherman DJ,
    3. Grant WE.
    2005. Coastal erosion, global sea-level rise, and the loss of sand dune plant habitats. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:359–364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. FNAI
    . 2010. Guide to the natural communities of Florida. 2010 edition. Tallahassee (FL): Florida Natural Areas Inventory.
  8. ↵
    1. Fournier M. n.d.
    Standards for creating and restoring sand dunes: from Massachusetts to North Carolina. In: Miller CC and Skaradek WB, editors. Cape May Plant Material Center, and RPS, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
  9. ↵
    1. Frosini S,
    2. Lardicci C,
    3. Balestri E.
    2012. Global change and response of coastal dune plants to the combined effects of increased sand accretion (burial) and nutrient availability. PLOS ONE 7(10):e47561.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hooton N.
    2011. Restoration strategies for improving survival and composition of plant species native to coastal dunes in the Florida panhandle [MSc thesis]. Gainesville (FL). University of Florida. 81 p.
  11. ↵
    1. Hooton Graves N,
    2. Campbell-Martínez G,
    3. Thetford M,
    4. Miller D,
    5. Wilson S.
    2021. Conservation and re-establishment of Florida panhandle goldenasters (Chrysopsis): 1. Reproduction characteristics and germination requirements. Native Plants Journal 22(3): 315–322.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Hrdličková J,
    2. Hejcman M,
    3. Křiśtálová V,
    4. Pavlů V.
    2011. Production, size, and germination of broad-leaved dock seeds collected from mother plants grown under different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium supplies. Weed Biology and Management 11:190–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2011.00420.x
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Jones MLM,
    2. Wallace HL,
    3. Norris D,
    4. Haria SA,
    5. Jones RE,
    6. Rhind PM,
    7. Reynolds BR,
    8. Emmett BA.
    2004. Changes in vegetation and soil characteristics in coastal sand dunes along a gradient of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Plant Biology 6:598–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Kooijman AM,
    2. Dopheide JCR,
    3. Sevink J,
    4. Takken I,
    5. Verstraten JM.
    1998. Nutrient limitations and their implications on the effects of atmospheric deposition in coastal dunes; lime-poor and lime-rich sites in the Netherlands. Journal of Ecology 86:511–526.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Lithgow D,
    2. Martínez ML,
    3. Gallego-Fernández JB,
    4. Hesp PA,
    5. Flores P,
    6. Gachuz S,
    7. Rodríguez-Revelo N,
    8. Jiménez-Orocia O,
    9. MendozaGonzález G,
    10. Álvarez-Molina LL.
    2013. Linking restoration ecology with coastal dune restoration. Geomorphology 199:214–224.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  16. ↵
    1. Long ZT,
    2. Fegley SR,
    3. Peterson CH.
    2013. Fertilization and plant diversity accelerate primary succession and restoration of dune communities. Plant Ecology 214:1419–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-013-0263-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Martínez ML,
    2. Hesp PA,
    3. Gallego-Fernández JB.
    2013. Coastal dunes: human impact and need for restoration. In: Martínez ML, Psuty NP, editors. Coastal dunes. Germany: Springer Verlag. p 1–14 (Chapter 1).
  18. ↵
    1. Miller DL,
    2. Thetford M,
    3. Schneider M.
    2008. Distance from the Gulf influences survival and growth of three barrier island dune plants. Journal of Coastal Research 24:261–266.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Nel R,
    2. Campbell EE,
    3. Harris L,
    4. Hauser L,
    5. Schoeman DS,
    6. McLachlan A,
    7. du Preez DR,
    8. Bezuidenhout K,
    9. Schlacher TA.
    2014. The status of sandy beach science: past trends, progress, and possible futures. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 150(A):1–10.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Norcini JG,
    2. Aldrich JH,
    3. Martin FG.
    2004. Harvest season influences fertilizer effects on seed production of lanceleaf coreopsis. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 22:229–233.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. O’Connell J.
    2008. Coastal dune protection and restoration using ‘Cape’ American beach grass and fencing. Marine Extension Bulletin, Woods Hole Sea Grant & Cape Cod Cooperative Extension. December.
  22. ↵
    1. Oskouie B,
    2. Divsalar M.
    2011. The effect of mother plant nitrogen on seed vigour and germination in rapeseed. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 6:49–56.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Plassmann K,
    2. Brown N,
    3. Jones ML,
    4. Edwards-Jones G.
    2008. Can atmospheric input of nitrogen affect seed bank dynamics in habitats of conservation interest? The case of dune slacks. Applied Vegetation Science 11:413–420.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Psuty NP,
    2. Rohr E.
    2000. Coastal dunes: a primer for dune management with models of dune response to storm frequencies. New Jersey Sea Grant NJSG-00-0-452. Fort Hancock (NJ): NJ Sea Grant Consortium.
  25. ↵
    1. Remke E,
    2. Brouwer E,
    3. Kooijman A,
    4. Blindow I,
    5. Roelofs JGM.
    2009. Low atmospheric nitrogen loads lead to grass encroachment in coastal dunes, but only on acid soils. Ecosystems 12:1173–1188.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Rhind P,
    2. Jones R,
    3. Jones L.
    2013. The impact of dune stabilization on the conservation status of sand dune systems in Wales. In: Martínez ML, Psuty NP, editors. Coastal dunes. Germany: Springer Verlag. p 125–143 (Chapter 9).
  27. ↵
    1. Rogers SM,
    2. Nash D.
    2003. The dune book. UNC-SG-03-03. Raleigh (NC): North Carolina Sea Grant.
    1. SAS Institute Inc
    . 2013. SAS/STAT 13.1 User’s Guide. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
  28. ↵
    1. Schlacher TA,
    2. Dugan J,
    3. Schoeman DS,
    4. Lastra M,
    5. Jones A,
    6. Scapini F,
    7. McLachlan A,
    8. Defeo O.
    2007. Sandy beaches at the brink. Diversity and Distributions 13:556–560.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Seliskar DM.
    1995. Coastal dune restoration: a strategy for alleviating dieout of Ammophila breviligulata. Restoration Ecology 3:54–60.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Sneckenberger S.
    2001. Factors influencing habitat use by the Alabama beach mouse Peromyscus polionotus ammobates [MSc Thesis]. Auburn (AL): Auburn University. 101 p.
  31. ↵
    1. Stallins JA,
    2. Parker AJ.
    2003. The influence of complex system interactions on barrier island dune vegetation pattern and process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93:13–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Surrency D.
    1992. Measures for stabilizing coastal dunes: Alabama, Georgia. Americus (GA): USDA Soil Conservation Service, Americus Plant Materials Center. 16 p.
  33. ↵
    1. Texas General Land Office
    . 2005. Coastal dunes, dune protection and improvement manual for the Texas Gulf Coast. Austin (TX): Texas General Land Office.
  34. ↵
    1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
    . 2007. Planting guide for establishing coastal vegetation on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Plant Materials Technical Note No. 104. USDA NRCS Jamie L. Whitten Plant Materials Center, Coffeeville, MS, and Ecological Sciences Staff. April. 39 p.
  35. ↵
    1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
    . 2018. The PLANTS database. http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 22 May 2018). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
  36. ↵
    1. Valverde T,
    2. Pisanty I,
    3. Rincón E.
    1997. Growth response of six tropical plant species to different nutrient regimes. Journal of Coastal Research 13:497–505.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. van den Berg LJL,
    2. Tomassen HBM,
    3. Roelofs JGM,
    4. Bobbink R.
    2005. Effects of nitrogen enrichment on coastal dune grassland: a mesocosm study. Environmental Pollution 138:77–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Veer M,
    2. Kooijman A.
    1997. Effects of grass-encroachment on vegetation and soil in Dutch dry dune grasslands. Plant and Soil 192:119–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004280300820
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Walmsley CA,
    2. Davy AJ.
    1997. The restoration of coastal shingle vegetation: effects of substrate on the establishment of container grown plants. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:154–165.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Whisenant SG.
    1999. Repairing damaged wildlands, a processoriented, landscape-scale approach. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  41. ↵
    1. Williams MJ.
    2007. Native plants for coastal dune restoration: what, when and how for Florida. Brooksville (FL): USDA NRCS, Brooksville Plant Materials Center.
  42. ↵
    1. Wilson MA,
    2. Costanza R,
    3. Boumans R,
    4. Liu S.
    2005. Integrated assessment and valuation of ecosystem goods and services provided by coastal systems. In: Wilson JG, editor. The intertidal ecosystem: the value of Ireland’s shores. Dublin (Ireland): Royal Irish Academy. p 1–23.
  43. ↵
    1. Wootton L,
    2. Miller J,
    3. Miller C,
    4. Peek M,
    5. Williams A,
    6. Rowe P.
    2016. New Jersey Sea Grant Consortium dune manual. http://www.njseagrant.org/dunemanual/ (accessed 28 May 2020).
  44. ↵
    1. Wunderlin RP,
    2. Hansen BF,
    3. Franck AR,
    4. Essig FB.
    2019. Atlas of Florida plants. http://florida.plantatlas.usf.edu/ (accessed 15 May 2019). [SM Landry and KN Campbell (application development), USF Water Institute.] Tampa (FL): Institute for Systematic Botany, University of South Florida.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 22 (3)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 22, Issue 3
21 Sep 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Conservation and re-establishment of Florida panhandle goldenasters (Chrysopsis): II. Growth and reproduction in response to fertilization within a coastal dune restoration context
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Conservation and re-establishment of Florida panhandle goldenasters (Chrysopsis): II. Growth and reproduction in response to fertilization within a coastal dune restoration context
Gabriel Campbell-Martínez, Mack Thetford, Debbie Miller, Gina Mangold
Native Plants Journal Sep 2021, 22 (3) 323-333; DOI: 10.3368/npj.22.3.323

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Conservation and re-establishment of Florida panhandle goldenasters (Chrysopsis): II. Growth and reproduction in response to fertilization within a coastal dune restoration context
Gabriel Campbell-Martínez, Mack Thetford, Debbie Miller, Gina Mangold
Native Plants Journal Sep 2021, 22 (3) 323-333; DOI: 10.3368/npj.22.3.323
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Drought eliminates transplant size benefits in the rare endemic Oregon semaphoregrass (Pleuropogon oregonus)
  • Influences of growing media particle size and nutrient addition on desert shrub propagation and field outplanting survival
  • Aspen (Populus tremuloides) germination is dependent on seed ripeness at collection and not seed age: A 12-y study of aspen seeds in long-term storage
Show more Refereed Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • coastal restoration
  • Cruise’s goldenaster
  • seed production
  • seed viability
  • seed germination
  • fertilization
  • Asteraceae
  • USDA NRCS (2018)
  • Wunderlin and others (2019)
UW Press logo

© 2026 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire