Roughing up smooth brome and dethroning crested wheatgrass with native plants: dominant to subordinate on Utah rangeland

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Beckstead J,
   2. Meyer SE,
   3. Connolly BM,
   4. Huck MB,
   5. Street LE.

   2010. Cheatgrass facilitates spillover of a seed bank pathogen onto native grass species. Journal of Ecology 98:168–177.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Boyte SP,
   2. Wylie BK,
   3. Major DJ.

   2014. Mapping and monitoring cheatgrass die-off in rangelands of the Northern Great Basin, USA. Rangeland Ecology and Management 68:18–28.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Connor LG.

   1921. A brief history of the sheep industry in the United States. Agricultural History Society Papers. Volume 1. 107 p.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Cox RD,
   2. Anderson VJ.

   2004. Increasing native diversity of cheatgrass-dominated rangeland through assisted succession. Journal of Range Management 57:203–210.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. De Groot RS

   . 1992. Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff. 315 p.
6. ↵
   1. De Groot RS,
   2. Wilson MA,
   3. Boumans RMJ.

   2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41:393–408.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Holechek JL,
   2. Pieper RD,
   3. Herbel CH.

   2004. Range management: principles and practices. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson/ Prentice Hall. 607 p.
8. ↵
   1. Johnson KL.

   1989. Rangeland resources of Utah. Logan (UT): Cooperative Extension Service, Utah State University. 103 p.
9. ↵
   1. Keck WM.

   1972. Great Basin Station—sixty years of progress in range and watershed research. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-118. 40 p.
10. ↵
    1. Larson DL,
    2. Anderson PJ,
    3. Newton N.

    2001. Alien plant invasion in mixed-grass prairie: effects of vegetation type and anthropogenic disturbance. Ecological Applications 11(1):128–141.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Pasari TL,
    2. Zavaleta ES,
    3. Tilman D.

    2013. Several scales of biodiversity affect ecosystem functionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 110:10219–10222.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Pellant MP,
    2. Shaver P,
    3. Pyke DA,
    4. Herrick JF.

    2005. Interpreting indicators of rangeland health, version 4. Denver (CO): U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center. BLM/WO/ST-00/001+1734/REV05. Technical Reference 1734-6. 122 p.
13. ↵
    1. Petchey OL,
    2. Gaston KJ.

    2006. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecological Letters 9:741–758.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Pickford GD,
    2. Jackman ER.

    1944. Reseeding Oregon summer ranges. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 159. 48 p.
15. ↵
    1. Pratt PP.

    1849. Letter from Parley P. Pratt to Orson Pratt, July 1849. Millennial Star 11:342

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Salo C.

    2018. Army cutworm outbreak produced cheatgrass die-offs and defoliated shrubs in Southwest Idaho in 2014. Rangelands 40:99–105.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Tilman D.

    2001. Functional diversity. In: Levin SA, editor. Encyclopedia of biodiversity. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. p 109–120.
18. ↵
    1. Tilman D,
    2. Downing JA.

    1994. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367:363–365.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Tilman D,
    2. Knops J,
    3. Wedin D,
    4. Reich P,
    5. Ritchie M,
    6. Siemann E.

    1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300–1302.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 1. Tropicos.org

    . 2020. Online database. URL: http://www.tropicos.org (accessed 12 Feb 2020). St Louis (MO): Missouri Botanical Garden.