Powdery mildew infection is affected by interacting factors in a polyploid goldenrod system

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Altizer S,
   2. Ostfeld RS,
   3. Johnson PT,
   4. Kutz S,
   5. Harvell CD

   . 2013. Climate change and infectious diseases: from evidence to a predictive framework. Science 341:514–519.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   1. Aust H,
   2. Hoyningen-Huene JV

   . 1986. Microclimate in relation to epidemics of powdery mildew. Annual Reviews in Phytopathology 24:491–510.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Beaver LW,
   2. Cienfuegos R

   . 1990. Powdery mildew inoculation techniques for a Cucurbita moschata breeding program. HortScience 25:1075.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   1. Brasier C

   . 2008. The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathology 57:792–808.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Caffarra A,
   2. Rinaldi M,
   3. Eccel E,
   4. Rossi V,
   5. Pertot I

   . 2012. Modelling the impact of climate change on the interaction between grapevine and its pests and pathogens: European grapevine moth and powdery mildew. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 148:89–101.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Carroll J,
   2. Wilcox W

   . 2003. Effects of humidity on the development of grapevine powdery mildew. Phytopathology 93:1137–1144.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Castro S,
   2. Romeiras MM,
   3. Castro M,
   4. Duarte MC,
   5. Loureiro J

   . 2013. Hidden diversity in wild Beta taxa from Portugal: insights from genome size and ploidy level estimations using flow cytometry. Plant Science 207:72–78.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Chakraborty S,
   2. Tiedemann A,
   3. Teng PS

   . 2000. Climate change: potential impact on plant diseases. Environmental Pollution 108:317–326.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Comai L

   . 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 6:836–846.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Cook RT,
    2. Henricot B,
    3. Henrici A,
    4. Beales P

    . 2006. Morphological and phylogenetic comparisons amongst powdery mildews on Catalpa in the UK. Mycological Research 110:672–685.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    1. Divon HH,
    2. Fluhr R

    . 2006. Nutrition acquisition strategies during fungal infection of plants. FEMS Microbiology Letters 266:65–74.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Donald T,
    2. Pellerone F,
    3. Adam-Blondon AF,
    4. Bouquet A,
    5. Thomas M,
    6. Dry I

    2002. Identification of resistance gene analogs linked to a powdery mildew resistance locus in grapevine. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104:610–618.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Ellwood S,
    2. Kamphuis L,
    3. Pfaff T,
    4. Oliver R,
    5. Samac D,
    6. Foster-Hartnett D,
    7. Tivoli B,
    8. Onfroy C,
    9. Moussart A,
    10. Villegas A

    . 2006. Inoculation and growth with foliar pathogenic fungi. Medicago truncatula Handbook. Ardmore (OK): Noble Research Institute.
14. ↵
    1. Enright SM,
    2. Cipollini D

    . 2007. Infection by powdery mildew Erysiphe cruciferarum (Erysiphaceae) strongly affects growth and fitness of Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 94:1813–1820.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 1. Etterson JR

    . In prep. Evolution of flowering phenology differs between diploid and hexaploid cytotypes of a native goldenrod species under climate change conditions. Access at https://sites.google.com.d.umn.edu/dr-julie-r-etterson/research/evolution-of-polyploids.
16. ↵
    1. Etterson JR,
    2. Toczydlowski RH,
    3. Winkler KJ,
    4. Kirschbaum JA,
    5. McAulay TS

    . 2016. Solidago altissima differs with respect to ploidy frequency and clinal variation across the prairie-forest biome border in Minnesota. American Journal of Botany 103:22–32.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Farr DF,
    2. Rossman AY

    . 2018. Fungal databases. U.S. National Fungus Collections. USDA Agriculatural Research Service. URL: https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ (accessed 13 Aug 2018).
18. ↵
    1. Fehlberg SD,
    2. Ferguson CJ

    . 2012. Intraspecific cytotypic variation and complicated genetic structure in the Phlox amabilis–P. woodhousei (Polemoniaceae) complex. American Journal of Botany 99:865–874.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Garrett KA,
    2. Dendy SP,
    3. Frank EE,
    4. Rouse MN,
    5. Travers SE

    . 2006. Climate change effects on plant disease: genomes to ecosystems. Annual Review of Phytopathology 44:489–509.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Glawe DA

    . 2008. The powdery mildews: a review of the world’s most familiar (yet poorly known) plant pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 46:27–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Gorter G

    . 1987. Relevance of conidial surface structure for identifying Erysiphe galeopsidis DC. South African Journal of Science 83:112–114.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Hajji ME,
    2. Dreyer E,
    3. Marçais B

    . 2009. Impact of Erysiphe alphitoides on transpiration and photosynthesis in Quercus robur leaves. European Journal of Plant Pathology 125:63–72.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Harvell CD,
    2. Mitchell CE,
    3. Ward JR,
    4. Altizer S,
    5. Dobson AP,
    6. Ostfeld RS,
    7. Samuel MD

    . 2002. Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science 296:2158–2162.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. ↵
    1. Hildebrand P,
    2. Sutton J

    . 1982. Weather variables in relation to an epidemic of onion downy mildew. Phytopathology 72:219–224.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Jarvis P

    . 1964. The adaptability to light intensity of seedlings of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Journal of Ecology 52:545–571.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Kalinina O,
    2. Zeller SL,
    3. Schmid B

    . 2011. Competitive performance of transgenic wheat resistant to powdery mildew. PLoS One 6:e28091.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
27. ↵
    1. Kiss L,
    2. Stuart K,
    3. Grigg J,
    4. Calvert J,
    5. Dearnaley JD

    . 2017. First report of powdery mildew on Goji Berry (Lycium barbarum) caused by Arthrocladiella mougeotii in Queensland, Australia. Plant Disease Journal. URL: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-17-1055-PDN.
28. ↵
    1. Kover PX,
    2. Schaal BA

    . 2002. Genetic variation for disease resistance and tolerance among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:11270–11274.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    1. Laine AL

    . 2004. Resistance variation within and among host populations in a plant–pathogen metapopulation: implications for regional pathogen dynamics. Journal of Ecology 92:990–1000.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. La Porta N,
    2. Capretti P,
    3. Thomsen IM,
    4. Kasanen R,
    5. Hietala AM,
    6. Von Weissenberg K

    . 2008. Forest pathogens with higher damage potential due to climate change in Europe. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 30:177–195.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Lyngkjær MF,
    2. Jensen H,
    3. Østergård H

    . 1995. A Japanese powdery mildew isolate with exceptionally large infection efficiency on Mlo-resistant barley. Plant Pathology 44:786–790.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Marcais B,
    2. Breda N

    . 2006. Role of an opportunistic pathogen in the decline of stressed oak trees. Journal of Ecology 94:1214–1223.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Marçais B,
    2. Desprez-Loustau M-L

    . 2014. European oak powdery mildew: impact on trees, effects of environmental factors, and potential effects of climate change. Annals of Forest Science 71:633–642.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Mauricio R

    . 2000. Natural selection and the joint evolution of tolerance and resistance as plant defenses. Evolutionary Ecology 14:491–507.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Mumford R,
    2. Macarthur R,
    3. Boonham N

    . 2016. The role and challenges of new diagnostic technology in plant biosecurity. Food Security 8:103–109.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Oliva J,
    2. Stenlid J,
    3. Martínez-Vilalta J

    . 2014. The effect of fungal pathogens on the water and carbon economy of trees: implications for drought-induced mortality. New Phytologist 203:1028–1035.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Parker IM,
    2. Gilbert GS

    . 2004. The evolutionary ecology of novel plant-pathogen interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:675–700.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Prats E,
    2. Gay AP,
    3. Mur LA,
    4. Thomas BJ,
    5. Carver TL

    . 2006. Stomatal lock-open, a consequence of epidermal cell death, follows transient suppression of stomatal opening in barley attacked by Blumeria graminis. Journal of Experimental Botany 57:2211–2226.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Renny-Byfield S,
    2. Ainouche M,
    3. Leitch IJ,
    4. Lim KY,
    5. Le Comber SC,
    6. Leitch AR

    . 2010. Flow cytometry and GISH reveal mixed ploidy populations and Spartina nonaploids with genomes of S. alterniflora and S. maritima origin. Annals of Botany:mcq008.
40. ↵
    1. Saenz GS,
    2. Taylor JW

    . 1999. Phylogeny of the Erysiphales (powdery mildews) inferred from internal transcribed spacer ribosomal DNA sequences. Canadian Journal of Botany 77:150–168.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Schmid B

    . 1994. Effects of genetic diversity in experimental stands of Solidago altissima: evidence for the potential role of pathogens as selective agents in plant populations. Journal of Ecology 82:165–175.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Semple JC,
    2. Cook RE

    . 2006. Solidago Linnaeus. In: Flora North America Editorial Committee, editors. Flora of North America, Vol. 20. Asteraceae, Part 2. Astereae and Senecioneae. New York: Oxford University Press. p 107–166.
43. ↵
    1. Simms EL,
    2. Triplett J

    . 1994. Costs and benefits of plant responses to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48:1973–1985.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Spanu PD,
    2. Panstruga R

    . 2012. Powdery mildew genomes in the cross-hairs. New Phytologist 195:20–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
45. ↵
    1. Takamatsu S

    . 2013. Origin and evolution of the powdery mildews (Ascomycota, Erysiphales). Mycoscience 54:75–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. ↵
    1. Talent N,
    2. Dickinson TA

    . 2005. Polyploidy in Crataegus and Mespilus (Rosaceae, Maloideae): evolutionary inferences from flow cytometry of nuclear DNA amounts. Botany 83:1268–1304.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Tang X,
    2. Cao X,
    3. Xu X,
    4. Jiang Y,
    5. Luo Y,
    6. Ma Z,
    7. Fan J,
    8. Zhou Y

    . 2017. Effects of climate change on epidemics of powdery mildew in winter wheat in China. Plant Disease. PDIS-02-17-0168-RE.
48. ↵
    1. University of Minnesota Plant Disease Clinic

    . 2017. URL: https://pdc.umn.edu (accessed 2017). St Paul (MN): Department of Plant Pathology.
49. ↵
    1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

    . 2018. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed July 2018). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
50. ↵
    1. Van der Putten WH,
    2. Macel M,
    3. Visser ME

    . 2010. Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 365:2025–2034.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
51. ↵
    1. Warkentin T,
    2. Rashid K,
    3. Zimmer R

    . 1995. Effectiveness of a detached leaf assay for determination of the reaction of pea plants to powdery mildew. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 17:87–89.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Zeller SL,
    2. Kalinina O,
    3. Schmid B

    . 2012. Costs of resistance to fungal pathogens in genetically modified wheat. Journal of Plant Ecology 6:92–100.

    OpenUrl