Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleRefereed Research
Open Access

Germination ecology of native plant species for use in restoration and the urban landscape in Nova Scotia, Canada

Amy Heim, Ayako Nagase, Jeremy Lundholm and Carly Wrathall
Native Plants Journal, September 2018, 19 (3) 201-215; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.19.3.201
Amy Heim
, PhD Student, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Heim.Amy.E{at}gmail.com
Ayako Nagase
, Associate Professor, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anagase{at}chiba-u.jp
Jeremy Lundholm
, Professor, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Jeremy.Lundholm{at}smu.ca
Carly Wrathall
, Pollution Prevention Officer, Environmental Office, Halifax Water, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: carly.wrathall{at}gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    One of the coastal barren seed collection sites (Chubucto Head) (A), the growth chamber used in Trials 1 and 4 (B), and the growth chamber used in Trials 2 and 3 (C). Photo by Amy Heim

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Vaccinium angustifolium (Green roof, Saint Mary’s University). Photo by Amy Heim

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Vaccinium macrocarpon (Duncan’s Cove Nature Reserve, Nova Scotia). Photo by Amy Heim

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Plantago maritima (Crystal Crescent Provincial Park, Nova Scotia). Photo by Jeremy Lundholm

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Lathyrus japonicus (Crystal Crescent Provincial Park, Nova Scotia). Photo by Jeremy Lundholm

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Spartina pectinata (A) and Oenothera biennis (B) germinating in the wet treatment during the 2013 trial. Photo by Amy Heim

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Hudsonia ericoides (Duncan’s Cove Nature Reserve, Nova Scotia). Photo by Jeremy Lundholm

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Average germination rate (A) and average number of days until germination (B) for Spartina alterniflora, S. patens, and S. pectinata when stored in freshwater (fresh) vs. saltwater (salt) at 4 °C vs. –20 °C. Spartina alterniflora in the freshwater at –20 °C treatment did not germinate, and only 1 replicate germinated in the saltwater at –20 °C treatment. For each species, those bars that share a letter are not significantly different. Error bar indicates standard error.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Overview of the 4 germination trials.

    TrialPlant speciesMonth Year collectedPre-storage treatmentStorage temperatureStorage durationIrrigation treatmentGermination duration
    1Empetrum nigrum
    Empetrum eamesii
    Vaccinium angustifolium


    Gaylussacia dumosa
    August 2004



    September 2004
    Seeds
    Berries
      4 °C
    −20 °C
    6 moFreshwater2 mo
    Vaccinium macrocarponOctober 2004
    2Juncus gerardiiJuly 2013
    Festuca rubraAugust 2013
    Schoenoplectus maritimus
    Spartina patens
    Spartina pectinata
    September 2013
    Anaphalis margaritacea
    Atriplex glabriusculata
    Lathyrus japonicus
    Limonium carolinianum
    Oenothera biennis
    Plantago maritima
    Solidago sempervirens
    Spartina alterniflora
    Symphyotrichum novi-belgii
    October 2013Freshwater
    dry
    4 °C2.5 moFreshwater2.5 mo
    3Spartina alterniflora
    Spartina patens
    Spartina pectinata
    October 2014Freshwater  4 °C
    −20 °C
    2.5 moFreshwater
    Saltwater
    34 d
    4Calamagrostis pickeringii
    Hudsonia ericoides


    Limonium carolinianum
    Plantago maritima
    August 2015


    October 2015
    Freshwater dry4 °C2 yFreshwater
    Saltwater
    2.5 mo
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Average germination rate (%) ± SE and number of seeds per replicate (x/x) for species in Trial 1.

    Storage temperature4 °C20 °C4 °C20 °C
    Storage treatmentSeedsSeedsBerryBerry
    Empetrum nigrum (x/8)25.7±5.80.1±.0600
    Vaccinium angustifolium (x/41)14.8±2.2000
    Empetrum eamesii (x/8)014.6±4.100
    Gaylussacia dumosa (x/10)0000
    Vaccinium macrocarpon (x/16)65.6±4.8NA2.8±2.8NA
    • Notes: Replicates for Gaylussacia dumosa treatments were n = 9, and replicates for all other treatments were n = 18. SE, standard error.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Average germination rate and average number of days until germination ± SE for species in Trial 2.

    SpeciesGermination rate (%)Average days until germination
    Trial 2Wet (x/20)Dry (x/20)WetDry
    Anaphalis margaritacea13.3±6.03.3±3.312.2±0.414.0±NA
    Atriplex glabrisculata96.7±3.3*70.0±7.6*4.1±0.2*27.6±3.7*
    Festuca rubra58.3 ±3.353.3±1.76.4±0.3*10.0±0.3*
    Lathyrus japonicus0.0±0.01.7±1.7NA6 ±NA
    Limonium carolinianum65.0±7.650.0±2.96.4±0.6*21.6±0.7*
    Oenothera biennis95.0±2.9*15.0±2.9*3.3±1.0*9.5±3.6*
    Plantago maritima95.0±2.9*13.3±1.7*3.4±0.110.9±4.9
    Schoenoplectus maritimus10.0±7.610.0±5.87.9±2.415.9±5.5
    Solidago sempervirens85.0±7.636.7±7.3*4.3±0.1*10.5±1.1*
    Spartina alterniflora35.0±5.8*18.3±1.7*19.2±3.0*31.5±1.7*
    Spartina patens28.3±3.3*6.7±1.7*6.3±0.6*47.0±7.5*
    Spartina pectinata40.0±8.7*6.7±1.7*6.3±0.4*44.2±5.1*
    Symphyotrichum novi-belgii51.7±9.338.3±9.34.9±0.3*19.0±3.3*
    • ↵Notes: Each species was stored at 4 °C and had a freshwater and a dry storage treatment. Trial 2 had 3 replicates with 20 seeds per replicate. For each species and category, an * indicates significant difference between treatments (P < 0.05). Only 1 replicate of Lathyrus japonicus germinated, and only 1 replicate of Anaphalis margaritacea germinated in the dry treatment, therefore, the average could not be calculated for these species. SE, standard error.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Trial 4: Freshwater vs. dry storage for Plantago maritima, Hudsonia ericoides, and Limonium carolinianum, and the use of saltwater vs. freshwater irrigation for Plantago maritima.

    SpeciesGermination rate (%)Average days until germination
    StorageWet (x/50)Dry (x/50)WetDry
    Hudsonia ericoides2.0±2.011.8±2.24±NA5.9±0.9
    Limonium carolinianum3.3±1.311.3±1.8*2.3±0.7*18.6±1.9
    StorageDryWetDryWet
    IrrigationFreshSaltFreshSaltFreshSaltFreshSalt
    Plantago maritima39.3±6.4*6.0±6.010.0±3.19.3±2.43.9±0.97.5±1.28.1±1.213.4±4.5
    • ↵Notes: This table shows average germination rate and the average number of days until germination ± SE (standard error). The trial used 3 replicates with 50 seeds per replicate. An * indicates that the treatment performed significantly better (P < 0.05) than all other treatments. For Hudsonia ericoides, 2 of the 3 replicates in the wet treatment did not germinate. For P. maritima, the dry storage/freshwater treatment was significantly different from the wet storage/freshwater treatment.

    • View popup
    Table A.1

    Habitats where each species used in this study is commonly found.

    SpeciesFamilyHabitat
    Anaphalis margaritacea (L.) Benth.AsteraceaeRoadside
    Atriplex glabriusculata EdmondstonChenopodiaceaeSalt marsh
    Calamagrostis pickeringii A. GrayPoaceaeCoastal barren
    Empetrum nigrum L.EricaceaeCoastal barren
    Empetrum eamesii Fernald & WiegandEricaceaeCoastal barren
    Festuca rubra L.PoaceaeCoastal barren
    Gaylussacia dumosa Fern.EricaceaeCoastal barren
    Hudsonia ericoides L.CistaceaeCoastal barren
    Juncus gerardii Loisel.JuncaceaeSalt marsh
    Lathyrus japonicus Willd.FabaceaeSalt marsh, dunes
    Limonium carolinianum (Walter) BrittonPlumbaginaceaeSalt marsh
    Oenothera biennis L.OnagraceaeRoadside
    Plantago maritima L.PlantaginaceaeSalt marsh, coastal barren
    Schoenoplectus maritimus (L.) Nels.CyperaceaeSalt marsh
    Solidago sempervirens L.AsteraceaeSalt marsh, dunes, coastal barren
    Spartina alterniflora Loisel.PoaceaeSalt marsh
    Spartina patens (Ait.) Muhl.PoaceaeSalt marsh
    Spartina pectinata Bosc ex LinkPoaceaeSalt marsh
    Symphyotrichum novi-belgii L.AsteraceaeCoastal barren, roadside
    Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.EricaceaeCoastal barren
    Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.EricaceaeCoastal barren
    • View popup
    TABLE A.2

    For each trial, this table includes the number of replicates used for each treatment, the number of seeds used in each replicate, and the location in Nova Scotia where seeds were collected.

    TrialReplicates for each treatmentSeeds per replicateLocation of seed collection
    118, Vaccinium macrocarpon1644.50722 N, 63.52278 W
    18, Empetrum nigrum844.50722 N, 63.52278 W
    18, Empetrum eamesii844.50722 N, 63.52278 W
    18, Vaccinium angustifolium4144.50722 N, 63.52278 W
    9, Gaylussacia dumosa1044.50722 N, 63.52278 W
    232044.50722 N, 63.52278 W
    44.63222 N, 63.58139 W
    44.64556 N, 63.37444 W
    382044.64556 N, 63.37444 W 44.64972 N, 63.42083 W
    44.99722 N, 64.14306 W
    45.07889 N, 64.13083 W
    435044.50722 N, 63.52278 W
    44.64556 N, 63.37444 W
    • Notes: For Trial 1, the number of seeds for each replicate was chosen based on the average number of seeds found in a typical berry for that species.

    • View popup
    TABLE A.3

    Trial 1: Two-way ANOVA table for the germination rate of E. nigrum, E. eamesii, V. angustifolium, and V. macrocarpon for seeds and berries stored at 4 °C and −20 °C.

    SpeciesDfSum sqMean sqF valuePr(>F)
    Vaccinium angustifolium
    Fruit  1    981.6  981.645.444.14e-09
    Temp  1    981.6  981.645.444.14e-09
    Fruit : Temp  1    981.6  981.645.444.14e-09
    Residuals68  1469.0    21.6
    Empetrum nigrum
    Fruit  1  2813281218.036.76e-05
    Temp  1  3134313420.092.91e-05
    Fruit : Temp  1  2812281218.036.76e-05
    Residuals6810608  156
    Empetrum eamesii
    Fruit  1    957  957.012.810.00064
    Temp  1    957  957.012.810.00064
    Fruit : Temp  1    957  957.012.810.00064
    Residuals68  5078  74.7
    Vaccinium macrocarpon
    Fruit  13554835548128.44.32e-13
    Residuals34  9412  277
    • Notes: For V. macrocarpon, seeds and berries were stored only at 4 °C.

    • View popup
    TABLE A.4

    One-way ANOVA tables for the average germination rate for species in Trial 2.

    Germination rateTrans.DfSum sqMean sqF valuePr(>F)
    Anaphalis margaritacea12.3382.3378  3.0780.154
        Residuals43.0380.7595
    Atriplex glabriusculata17.7097.70912.20.0251
        Residuals42.5280.632
    Festuca rubraLog10.011470.011473  1.8610.244
        Residuals40.024660.006165
    Limonium carolinianum10.66160.6616  2.9950.159
        Residuals40.88380.2209
    Lathyrus japonicus10.20710.2071  10.374
        Residuals40.82830.2071
    Symphyotrichum novi-belgii10.5570.5570  1.10.353
        Residuals42.0260.5064
    Oenothera biennisLog15.3255.32585.860.000754
        Residuals40.2480.062
    Spartina alterniflora11.1170  1.1170  9.2190.0385
        Residuals40.4847  0.1212
    Plantago maritimaLog15.881  5.881  204.30.000139
        Residuals40.115  0.029
    Schoenoplectus maritimus10.0140.0144  0.009      0.929
        Residuals46.4501.6124
    Spartina patens14.629  4.629  35.23  0.00404
        Residuals40.526  0.131
    Spartina pectinata17.667  7.667  25.19  0.00739
        Residuals41.218  0.304
    Solidago sempervirens19.654  9.654  8.153    0.0461
        Residuals44.736  1.184
    • Notes: Each species was stored at 4 °C and had a freshwater and dry storage treatment. Non-normal data sets were log transformed (Trans.).

    • View popup
    TABLE A.5

    One-way ANOVA tables for average number of days until germination for species in Trial 2.

    Average days until germinationTrans.DfSum sqMean sqF valuePr(>F)
    Atriplex glabriusculata1827.2827.2  40.420.00314
        Residuals4  81.9  20.5
    Anaphalis margaritacea1    2.341    2.3408    4.1550.178
        Residuals2    1.127    0.5633
    Festuca rubra1  19.512  19.512  71.820.00106
        Residuals4    1.087    0.272
    Limonium carolinianumLog1    2.235    2.235146.50.000267
        Residuals4    0.061    0.0153
    Lathyrus japonicus1    6.0    6.0    1.00.374
        Residuals4  24    6.0
    Symphyotrichum novi-belgii1295.68295.6817.660.0137
        Residuals4  66.98  16.74
    Oenothera biennis11872.71872.792.860.000649
        Residuals4    80.7    20.2
    Plantago maritimaLog1      1.443      1.4431  4.6750.0967
        Residuals4      1.235      0.3087
    Spartina alterniflora1  227.55  227.5513.210.0221
        Residuals4    68.89    17.22
    Schoenoplectus maritimus1    50.58    50.58  0.9470.386
        Residuals4  213.57    53.39
    Spartina patens13361336139.410.00329
        Residuals4  341.0    85.0
    Spartina pectinata12150.82150.854.060.00182
        Residuals4  159.1    39.8
    Solidago sempervirens1    57.47    57.4731.070.00508
        Residuals4      7.40      1.85
    • Notes: Each species was stored at 4 °C and had a freshwater and dry storage treatment. Non-normal data sets were log transformed (Trans.).

    • View popup
    TABLE A.6

    ANOVA table for the germination rate for S. alterniflora, S. patens, and S. pectinata when stored in freshwater (fresh) vs. saltwater (salt) at 4 °C vs. −20 °C.

    Trans.DfSum sqMean sqF valuePr(>F)
    Spartina alternifloraLog(1+data)
    Temperature  163.563.559.6171.47e-10
    Irrigation  1      .53      .53    .495.484
    Temp : irrigation  1  1.38    1.38  1.295.260
    Residuals6063.91    1.07
    Spartina patenssqrt
    Temperature  1141.49141.4927.9641.83e-06
    Irrigation  1  16.01  16.01  3.1640.08033
    Temp : irrigation  1  59.6  59.611.7790.00109
    Residuals60303.59    5.06
    Spartina pectinata^(1/3)
    Temperature  123.3623.3622.241.48e-05
    Irrigation  111.8211.8211.26.00138
    Temp : irrigation  119.6519.6618.715.84e-05
    Residuals6063.03  1.05
    • View popup
    TABLE A.7

    Two-way ANOVA table for the average number of days until germination for S. alterniflora, S. patens, and S. pectinata when stored in freshwater (fresh) vs. saltwater (salt) at 4 °C vs. −20 °C.

    Trans.DfSum sqMean sqF valuePr(>F)
    Spartina alterniflora
    Temperature  1  47.27  47.27  3.539  .07388
    Irrigation  1118.23118.23  8.8510.00722
    Residuals21280.52  13.36
    Spartina patensLog
    Temperature  1    0.2982    0.2982  5.2070.027392
    Irrigation  1    1.0247    1.024717.8940.000116
    Temp: irrigation  1    0.0842    1.470  0.231782
    Residuals4444 2.5198    0.0573
    Spartina pectinatasqrt
    Temperature  1  14.290  14.29076.3806.55e-11
    Irrigation  1    4.373    4.37323.3731.91e-05
    Temp: irrigation  1    1.868    1.868  9.982 0.00297
    Residuals41    7.671    0.187
    • View popup
    TABLE A.8

    One-way ANOVA tables for the average germination rate and average number of days until germination for species in Trial 4.

    Germination rateDfSum sqMean sqF valuePr(>F)
    Hudsonia ericoides10.91760.9176  3.4990.135
        Residuals41.04910.2623
    Limonium carolinianum13.0603.06011.380.028
        Residuals41.0760.269
    Days until germinationDfSum sqMean sqF valuePr(>F)
    Hudsonia ericoides1    6.380    6.3801.8120.311
        Residuals2    7.042    3.521
    Limonium carolinianum1570.2570.291.170.00067
        Residuals4  25.0    6.3
    • Notes: Each species was stored at 4 °C and had a freshwater and a dry storage treatment.

    • View popup
    TABLE A.9

    Two-way ANOVA test for the average germination rate of Plantago maritima in Trial 4.

    DfSum sqMean sqF valuePr(>F)
    Storage1507.0507.0  7.3830.02636
    Irrigation1867.0867.012.6260.00747
    Storage : Irrigation1800.3800.311.6550.00917
    Residuals8549.3  68.7
    • Notes: Treatments included freshwater vs. dry storage and the use of saltwater vs. freshwater irrigation during germination.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 19 (3)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 19, Issue 3
21 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Germination ecology of native plant species for use in restoration and the urban landscape in Nova Scotia, Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Germination ecology of native plant species for use in restoration and the urban landscape in Nova Scotia, Canada
Amy Heim, Ayako Nagase, Jeremy Lundholm, Carly Wrathall
Native Plants Journal Sep 2018, 19 (3) 201-215; DOI: 10.3368/npj.19.3.201

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Germination ecology of native plant species for use in restoration and the urban landscape in Nova Scotia, Canada
Amy Heim, Ayako Nagase, Jeremy Lundholm, Carly Wrathall
Native Plants Journal Sep 2018, 19 (3) 201-215; DOI: 10.3368/npj.19.3.201
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • APPENDIX TABLES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Germination and propagation of sweetgrass (Anthoxanthum nitens (Weber) Y. Schouten & Veldkamp [Poaceae]) for growing in Mikmaq community gardens
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Investigating seed dormancy and germination of important Wyoming forbs
  • Performance of 3 Florida native grasses grown in varying container substrates
  • Optimizing regeneration protocols for native Seeds of Success–collected milkvetch (Astragalus spp.) genetic resources
Show more Refereed Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • seed storage
  • saltwater
  • propagation
  • temperature
  • Kartesz and Meacham (1999)
UW Press logo

© 2026 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire