Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleRefereed Research
Open Access

Comparisons of cultivation methods for Lupinus sericeus, L. argenteus, L. prunophilus, and L. arbustus

Covy D Jones, Jason M Stettler, Scott L Jensen, Bryan G Hopkins, Von D Jolley, Dave Turner and Mikel R Stevens
Native Plants Journal, June 2018, 19 (2) 90-99; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.19.2.90
Covy D Jones
, Wildlife Biologist, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Wildlife Section, 1115 N Main Street, Springville, UT 84005,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cdjones{at}utah.gov
Jason M Stettler
, PhD Graduate Student, Plant Genetics, Brigham Young University, 4105 LSB, Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Provo, UT 84602,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jason.m.stettler{at}gmail.com
Scott L Jensen
, Botanist, USDA FS RMRS, Shrub Sciences Research Laboratory, 735 North 500 East, Provo, UT 84606,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sljensen{at}fs.fed.us
Bryan G Hopkins
, Professor, Brigham Young University, 5115 LSB, Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Provo, UT 84602,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hopkins{at}byu.edu
Von D Jolley
, Professor, Retired, Brigham Young University, 4105A LSB, Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Provo, UT 84602,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: vdjolley{at}gmail.com
Dave Turner
, Statistician, Retired, USDA FS RMRS; Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Logan Forestry Sciences Lab, 860 North 1200 East, Logan, UT 84321,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dlturner{at}fs.fed.us
Mikel R Stevens
, Professor, Brigham Young University, 5131 LSB, Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Provo, UT 84602,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mikel_stevens{at}byu.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Wild high-elevation population of silvery lupine (Lupinus argenteus Pursh [Fabaceae]) on the Wasatch Plateau near the research plots (see Figure 1).

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Map detailing lupine germplasm collection sites and common-garden locations in the eastern Great Basin.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Silky lupine (Lupinus sericeus) (A) and silvery lupine (L. argenteus) (B) plants from covered treatment during mid-flowering stage of the 2nd growing season.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Comparison of the average percent emergence and establishment between the sawdust and N-Sulate fabric (covered treatment) and the conventional control of 4 lupine species at each of the 2 common-garden locations (Fountain Green WMA farm and Snow Field Station). Hairy bigleaf lupine plants in the uncovered plots did not survive the 2nd growing season. No longspur lupine plants from either treatment plots survived the 2nd growing season.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Seed production rates for silvery and silky lupines in the 2nd and 3rd growing seasons. The common garden at Fountain Green WMA farm had higher production the 1st harvesting year, but the common garden at Snow Field Station had higher production the following year.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    The indeterminate flowering of a silvery lupine (Lupinus argenteus) in its native habitat.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Germplasm collection sites and research locations.

    Site nameLupine species collectedLatitudeLongitudeElevation (m)General location
    Bear CreekLongspur lupine, L. arbustus41.8377537−115.45651132469North-central NV
    Soldier CanyonSilvery lupine, L. argenteus40.8012972−115.35651121768North-central NV
    TinticHairy bigleaf lupine, L. prunophilus39.9632181−112.09516381950Central UT
    Buckskin FlatSilky lupine, L. sericeus39.6843129−111.67697661920Central UT
    Research locationCommon garden
    Ephraim, UTSnow Field Station39.36996−111.578321686Central UT
    Fountain Green, UTFountain Green WMA farm39.61010−111.617641749Central UT
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 19 (2)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 19, Issue 2
20 Jun 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparisons of cultivation methods for Lupinus sericeus, L. argenteus, L. prunophilus, and L. arbustus
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparisons of cultivation methods for Lupinus sericeus, L. argenteus, L. prunophilus, and L. arbustus
Covy D Jones, Jason M Stettler, Scott L Jensen, Bryan G Hopkins, Von D Jolley, Dave Turner, Mikel R Stevens
Native Plants Journal Jun 2018, 19 (2) 90-99; DOI: 10.3368/npj.19.2.90

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparisons of cultivation methods for Lupinus sericeus, L. argenteus, L. prunophilus, and L. arbustus
Covy D Jones, Jason M Stettler, Scott L Jensen, Bryan G Hopkins, Von D Jolley, Dave Turner, Mikel R Stevens
Native Plants Journal Jun 2018, 19 (2) 90-99; DOI: 10.3368/npj.19.2.90
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Investigating seed dormancy and germination of important Wyoming forbs
  • Performance of 3 Florida native grasses grown in varying container substrates
  • Optimizing regeneration protocols for native Seeds of Success–collected milkvetch (Astragalus spp.) genetic resources
Show more Refereed Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cultivation
  • native forbs
  • restoration
  • seed production
  • broadcast seeding
  • drill seeding
  • N-Sulate fabric
  • Fabaceae
  • Poaceae
  • USDA NRCS (2018)
UW Press logo

© 2026 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire