Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleRefereed Research
Open Access

Comparisons of cultivation methods for Lupinus sericeus, L. argenteus, L. prunophilus, and L. arbustus

Covy D Jones, Jason M Stettler, Scott L Jensen, Bryan G Hopkins, Von D Jolley, Dave Turner and Mikel R Stevens
Native Plants Journal, June 2018, 19 (2) 90-99; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.19.2.90
Covy D Jones
, Wildlife Biologist, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Wildlife Section, 1115 N Main Street, Springville, UT 84005,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Jason M Stettler
, PhD Graduate Student, Plant Genetics, Brigham Young University, 4105 LSB, Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Provo, UT 84602,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Scott L Jensen
, Botanist, USDA FS RMRS, Shrub Sciences Research Laboratory, 735 North 500 East, Provo, UT 84606,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Bryan G Hopkins
, Professor, Brigham Young University, 5115 LSB, Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Provo, UT 84602,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Von D Jolley
, Professor, Retired, Brigham Young University, 4105A LSB, Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Provo, UT 84602,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Dave Turner
, Statistician, Retired, USDA FS RMRS; Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Logan Forestry Sciences Lab, 860 North 1200 East, Logan, UT 84321,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Mikel R Stevens
, Professor, Brigham Young University, 5131 LSB, Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Provo, UT 84602,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Fire and invasive weeds have increased the demand for native seed for restoration across the Great Basin region of the US. Cultivation of native forbs could provide lessexpensive seed in necessary quantities to meet restoration needs that cannot be harvested from wildland populations alone. We evaluated 2 cultivation methods of 4 lupine species (Lupinus (Tournefort) [Fabaceae])—hairy bigleaf lupine (L. prunophilus M.E. Jones), silky lupine (L. sericeus Pursh), silvery lupine (L. argenteus Pursh), and longspur lupine (L. arbustus Douglas ex Lindl.)—to evaluate emergence, establishment, and seed production. We compared the conventional cultivation method of row crop production (control) using direct drilling to an experimental cultivation method of broadcast seeding with a mulch covering of sawdust and N-Sulate fabric (covered treatment). Under covered treatment conditions, emergence was significantly improved compared to conventional cultivation for all 4 lupine species, with P values of < 0.0001 for all 4 species. Similar results were found in 2nd-year establishment rates for silvery lupine, hairy bigleaf lupine, and silky lupine with all P values < 0.0001. Longspur lupine showed symptoms of iron deficiency chlorosis during the 1st growing season and consequently no plants established in subsequent years. Silvery lupine and silky lupine produced significantly more seed in the covered treatment than in the control with P values of < 0.0001 for both species. Our mulch treatment effectively increased emergence, establishment, and seed production in all surviving cultivars compared to the control method.

  • cultivation
  • native forbs
  • restoration
  • seed production
  • broadcast seeding
  • drill seeding
  • N-Sulate fabric
  • Fabaceae
  • Poaceae
NOMENCLATURE:
  • USDA NRCS (2018)
  • © 2018 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

This open access article is distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0) and is freely available online at: http://jhr.uwpress.org

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 19 (2)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 19, Issue 2
20 Jun 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparisons of cultivation methods for Lupinus sericeus, L. argenteus, L. prunophilus, and L. arbustus
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparisons of cultivation methods for Lupinus sericeus, L. argenteus, L. prunophilus, and L. arbustus
Covy D Jones, Jason M Stettler, Scott L Jensen, Bryan G Hopkins, Von D Jolley, Dave Turner, Mikel R Stevens
Native Plants Journal Jun 2018, 19 (2) 90-99; DOI: 10.3368/npj.19.2.90

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparisons of cultivation methods for Lupinus sericeus, L. argenteus, L. prunophilus, and L. arbustus
Covy D Jones, Jason M Stettler, Scott L Jensen, Bryan G Hopkins, Von D Jolley, Dave Turner, Mikel R Stevens
Native Plants Journal Jun 2018, 19 (2) 90-99; DOI: 10.3368/npj.19.2.90
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting propagation of 4 Florida native taxa of wild coffee (Psychotria spp.)
  • Evaluating the use of woody debris to enhance native plant establishment from seeds on legacy coal mines in West Virginia (USA)
  • Seedling emergence and seed production of curlycup gumweed
Show more Refereed Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cultivation
  • native forbs
  • restoration
  • seed production
  • broadcast seeding
  • drill seeding
  • N-Sulate fabric
  • Fabaceae
  • Poaceae
  • USDA NRCS (2018)
UWP

© 2023 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire