Exploring the human–nature relationship of conservation gardeners

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Aron A,
   2. Aron EN,
   3. Smollan D

   . 1992. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63:596–612.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Beery TH

   . 2013. Establishing reliability and construct validity for an instrument to measure environmental connectedness. Environmental Education Research 19(1):81–93. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.687045.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Burghardt KT,
   2. Tallamy DW

   . 2013. Plant origin asymmetrically impacts feeding guilds and life stages driving community structure of herbivorous arthropods. Diversity and Distributions 19(12):1553–1565.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Burghardt KT,
   2. Tallamy DW,
   3. Shriver WG

   . 2008. Impact of native plants on bird and butterfly biodiversity in suburban landscapes. Conservation Biology 23:219–224.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Burghardt KT,
   2. Tallamy DW,
   3. Philips C,
   4. Shropshire KJ

   . 2010. Non-native plants reduce abundance, richness, and host specialization in lepidopteran communities. Ecosphere 1(5):article 11.
6. ↵
   1. Cameron RW,
   2. Blanuša T,
   3. Taylor JE,
   4. Salisbury A,
   5. Halstead AJ,
   6. Henricot B,
   7. Thompson K

   . 2012. The domestic garden: its contribution to urban green infrastructure. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11:129–137. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.01.002.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Cartwright KS

   . 2016. Exploring the human dimension of conservation gardening [PhD dissertation]. Prescott (AZ): Prescott College. 164 p.
8. ↵
   1. Cervinka R,
   2. Röderer K,
   3. Hefler E

   . 2011. Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology 17(3):379–388. doi:10.1177/1359105311416873.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Clayton S

   . 2007. Domesticated nature: motivation for gardening and perceptions of environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27:215–224. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.001.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Daniels GD,
    2. Kirkpatrick JB

    . 2006. Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? Biological Conservation 133(3):326–335. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-0139-4.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Darke R,
    2. Tallamy DW

    . 2014. The living landscape: designing for beauty and biodiversity in the home garden. Portland (OR): Timber Press. 392 p.
12. ↵
    1. Davies R,
    2. Webber L

    . 2004. Enjoying our backyard buddies: social research information the practice of mainstream community education for the conservation of urban wildlife. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 20:77–87.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Davies RG,
    2. Webber LM,
    3. Barnes GS

    . 2004. Urban wildlife management: it’s as much about people. In: Lunney D, Burgin S, editors. Urban wildlife: more than meets the eye. Mosman (NSW): Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales. p 38–43.
14. ↵
    1. Davis JL,
    2. Green JD,
    3. Reed A

    . 2009. Interdependence with the environment: commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29:173–180. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Dunlap RE,
    2. Van Liere KD,
    3. Mertig AG,
    4. Jones RE

    . 2000. Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56:425–442.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Frantz CM,
    2. Mayer S

    . 2014. The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation 41:85–89. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Freeman C,
    2. Dickinson KJM,
    3. Porter S,
    4. van Heezik Y

    . 2012. “My garden is an expression of me”: exploring householders’ relationships with their gardens. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32:135–143. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.01.005.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Geng L,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Ye L,
    4. Zhou W,
    5. Zhou K

    . 2015. Connections with nature and environmental behaviors. Plos One 10(5):1–11. doi:10.1317/journal.pone.0127247.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. ↵
    1. Goddard MA,
    2. Dougill AJ,
    3. Benton TG

    . 2013. Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers, motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecological Economics 86:258–273. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.016.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Guéguen N,
    2. Stefan J

    . 2016. “Green altruism”: short immersion in natural green environments and helping behavior. Environment and Behavior 48(2):324–342. doi:10.1177/0013916514536576

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Hansla A,
    2. Gamble A,
    3. Juliusson A,
    4. Gärling T

    . 2008. The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Howell AJ,
    2. Dopko RL,
    3. Passmore H,
    4. Buro K

    . 2011. Nature connectedness: association with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences 519:166–171. doi:10.1016/p.paid.2011.03.037.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. IBM Corporation

    . 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corporation.
24. 1. [ITIS] Integrated Taxonomic Information System

    . 2017. Online database. URL: http://www.itis.gov (accessed Sep 2017). Washington (DC): National Museum of Natural History.
25. ↵
    1. Keniger LE,
    2. Gaston KJ,
    3. Irvine KN,
    4. Fuller RA

    . 2013. What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10:913–935. doi:10.3390.ijerph10030913.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Kermath B

    . 2007. Why go native? Landscaping for biodiversity and sustainability education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 8:210–223. doi:10.1108/14676370710726661.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Kiesling FM,
    2. Manning M

    . 2010. How green is your thumb? Environmental gardening identity and ecological gardening practices. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30:315–327. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.02.004.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Kuo FE,
    2. Sullivan WC

    . 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior 33:343–367.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Lepczyk CA,
    2. Mertig AG,
    3. Liu J

    . 2004. Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes. Environmental Management 33(1):110–125. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0036-z.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Lindemann-Matthies P,
    2. Marty T

    . 2013. Does ecological gardening increase species richness and aesthetic quality of a garden? Biological Conservation 159:37–44. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.011.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Luck GW,
    2. Davidson P,
    3. Boxall D,
    4. Smallbone L

    . 2011. Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conservation Biology 25(4):816–826. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01685.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
32. ↵
    1. Mayer FS,
    2. Frantz CM

    . 2004. The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24:503–515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Mayer FS,
    2. Frantz CM,
    3. Bruehlman-Senecal E,
    4. Doliver K

    . 2008. Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior 41(5):607–642. doi:10.1177/0013916508319745.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Milfont TL,
    2. Duckitt J,
    3. Cameron LD

    . 2006. A cross-cultural study of environmental motive concerns and their implications for proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior 38(6):745–67. doi:10.1177/0013916505285933.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Mitchell R,
    2. Popham F

    . 2008. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372:1655–1660.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Nisbet EK,
    2. Zelenski JM,
    3. Murphy SA

    . 2009. The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior 41:715–740. doi: 10.1177/0013916508318748.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Olivos P,
    2. Aragonés JI,
    3. Amérigo M

    . 2011. The connectedness to nature scale and its relationship with environmental beliefs and identity. International Journal of Hispanic Psychology 4(1):5–9.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Perrin JL,
    2. Benassi VA

    . 2009. The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of emotional connection to nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology 29:434–440. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.003.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Restall B,
    2. Conrad E

    . 2015. A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 159:264–278. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.022.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Schultz PW

    . 2000. Empathizing with nature: the effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues 56:391–406.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Schultz PW

    . 2001. The structure of environmental concern: concern for the self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21:327–339. doi:10.1006/jenvp.2001.0227.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Schultz PW

    . 2002. Inclusion with nature: the psychology of human-nature relations. In: Schmuck P, Schultz WP, editors. Psychology of sustainable development. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 61–78.
43. ↵
    1. Schultz PW,
    2. Shriver C,
    3. Tabanico J,
    4. Khazian A

    . 2004. Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24:31–42. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Shaw AE,
    2. Miller KK

    . 2016. Preaching to the converted? Designing wildlife gardening programs to engage the unengaged. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 15(3):214–224.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Shaw A,
    2. Miller K,
    3. Wescott G

    . 2013. Wildlife gardening and connectedness to nature: engaging the unengaged. Environmental Values 22:483–502. doi:10.319/096327113X13690717320748.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. ↵
    1. Smith RM,
    2. Thompson K,
    3. Hodgson JG,
    4. Warren PH,
    5. Gaston KJ

    . 2006. Urban domestic gardens (IX): composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biological Conservation 129(3):312–322. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.045.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    1. Tallamy DW

    . 2007. Bringing nature home: how you can sustain wildlife with native plants. Portland (OR): Timber Press. 358 p.
48. ↵
    1. Tam K-P

    . 2013. Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 34:64–78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. 1. Tam K-P,
    2. Lee S-L,
    3. Chao MM

    . 2013. Saving Mr. Nature: anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49:514–521. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

    . 2017. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed Sep 2017). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
51. ↵
    1. van Heezik YM,
    2. Dickinson KJM,
    3. Freeman C

    . 2012. Closing the gap: communicating to change gardening practices in support of native biodiversity in urban private gardens. Ecology and Society 17(1):34. doi:10.5751/ES-04712-170134.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
52. ↵
    1. Zelenski JM,
    2. Nisbet EK

    . 2014. Happiness and feeling connected: the distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior 46(1):3–23. doi:10.1177/0013916512451901.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. ↵
    1. Zelenski JM,
    2. Dopko RL,
    3. Capaldi CA

    . 2015. Cooperation is in our nature: nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 42:24–31. doi:10.1016/j/jenvp.2015.01.005.

    OpenUrlCrossRef