Competitive interactions between an exotic annual, Halogeton glomeratus, and 10 North American native species

REFERENCES

1. 1. Aerts R.

   1999. Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks. Journal of Experimental Botany 50:29–37.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Allen EB.

   1995. Restoration ecology: limits and possibilities in arid and semiarid lands. In: Roundy BA, McArthur ED, Haley JS, Mann DK, compilers. Proceedings, wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium; 1993 October 19–21; Las Vegas, NV. Ogden (UT): USDA, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report INT-315. p 7–15.
3. 1. Allen EB,
   2. Allen MF.

   1988. Facilitation of succession by the nonmycotrophic colonizer Salsola kali (Chenopodiaceae) on a harsh site: effects of mycorrhizal fungi. American Journal of Botany 75:257–266.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Cook CW.

   1965. Grass seeding response to halogeton competition. Journal of Range Management 18:317–321.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Craine JM.

   2005. Reconciling plant strategy theories of Grime and Tilman. Journal of Ecology 93:1041–1052.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Cronin EH.

   1965. Ecological and physiological factors influencing chemical control of Halogeton glomeratus. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture. Technical Bulletin No. 1325.
7. 1. Duda JJ,
   2. Freeman DC,
   3. Emlen JM,
   4. Belnap J,
   5. Kitchen SG,
   6. Zak JC,
   7. Sobek E,
   8. Tracy M,
   9. Montante J.

   2003. Differences in native soil ecology associated with invasion of the exotic annual chenopod, Halogeton glomeratus. Biology and Fertility of Soils 38:72–77.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Dukes JS,
   2. Mooney HA.

   2004. Disruption of ecosystem processes in western North America by invasive species. Revista chilena de historia natural 77:411–437.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
9. 1. Goodrich S,
   2. Zobell A.

   2011. Trend of Gardner saltbush and halogeton in the Lower Green River Basin, Wyoming. Natural Resources and Environmental Issues 17:1–7.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Grime JP.

    1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111:1169–1194.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Harper KT,
    2. Van Buren R,
    3. Kitchen SG.

    1996. Invasion of alien annuals and ecological consequences in salt desert shrublands of western Utah. In: Barrow JR, McArthur ED, Sorebee RE, Tausch RJ editors. Proceedings, symposium on shrubland ecosystem dynamics in a changing climate. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service. p 58–65.
12. 1. Herron CM.

    2010. Using annual plants to suppress weedy species in post-fire habitats [MSc thesis]. Fort Collins (CO): Colorado State University. 38 p.
13. 1. Kitchen S.

    2001. Winterfat decline and halogeton spread in the Great Basin. In: McArthur ED, Fairbanks DJ, compilers. Proceeding, shrubland ecosystem genetics and biodiversity. 2000 June 13–15; Provo, UT. Ogden (UT): USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRS-P-21. p 200–203.
14. 1. Kitchen SG,
    2. Jorgensen GL.

    2001. Winterfat decline and halogeton spread in the Great Basin. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRSP-21. p 200–203.
15. 1. Manier DJ,
    2. Aldridge C,
    3. O’Donnell M,
    4. Schell S.

    2014. Human infrastructure and invasive plant occurrence across rangelands of southwestern Wyoming, USA. Rangeland Ecology and Management 67:160–172.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Parker KG.

    1975. Some important Utah range plants. Logan (UT): Utah State University. Extension Service Bulletin EC-383. 174 p.
17. 1. Pejchar L,
    2. Mooney HA.

    2009. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:497–504.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 1. Pemberton RW.

    1986. The distribution of halogeton in North America. Journal of Range Management Archives 39:281–282.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Perry LG,
    2. Cronin SA,
    3. Paschke MA.

    2009. Native cover crops suppress exotic annuals and favor native perennials in a greenhouse competition experiment. Plant Ecology 204:247–259.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Pocewicz A,
    2. Copeland H,
    3. Kiesecker J.

    2011. Potential impacts of energy development on shrublands in western North America. Natural Resources and Environmental Issue 17:1–5.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Richards RT,
    2. Chambers JC,
    3. Ross C.

    1998. Use of native plants on federal lands: policy and practice. Journal of Range Management 51:625–632.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Roundy BA.

    1999. Lessons from historical rangeland revegetation for today’s restoration. In: Holzworth LK, Brown RW, compilers. Proceedings, revegetation with native species. Society for Ecological Restoration annual meeting; 1997 Nov 12–15; Ft Lauderdale, FL. Ogden (UT): USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Proceedings RMRS-P-8. p 33–38.
23. 1. Stevens R,
    2. McArthur ED.

    1990. ‘Immigrant’ forage kochia competition with halogeton following various seeding techniques. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report INT-276. p 175–180.
24. 1. Stubbendieck J,
    2. Hatch SL,
    3. Hirsch KJ.

    1986. North American range plants. 3rd ed. Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska Press. 495 p.
25. 1. Taylor MM,
    2. Hild A,
    3. Shaw NL,
    4. Norton U,
    5. Collier TR.

    2014. Plant recruitment and soil microbial characteristics of rehabilitation seedings following wildfire in northern Utah. Restoration Ecology 22:598–607.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

    . 2015. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (1 May 2015). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
27. 1. Young JA,
    2. Evans RA,
    3. Major J.

    1972. Alien plants in the Great Basin. Journal of Range Management 25:194–201.

    OpenUrl