Development of an in vitro propagation method for the classified New York State–threatened native species Agrimonia rostellata

REFERENCES

1. 1. Dávalos A,
   2. Nuzzo V,
   3. Blossey B.

   2014. Demographic responses of rare forest plants to multiple stressors: the role of deer, invasive species and nutrients. Journal of Ecology 102:1222–1233.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. George EF,
   2. Debergh PC.

   2008. Micropropagation: uses and methods. In: George EF, Hall MA, Klerk GJD, editors. Plant propagation by tissue culture. Volume 1: The background. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag GmbH. p 29–64.
3. 1. Goncalves S,
   2. Fernandes L,
   3. Romano A.

   2010. High-frequency in vitro propagation of the endangered species Tuberaria major. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 101:359–363.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Joshi P,
   2. Dhawan V.

   2007. Assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated Swertia chirayita plantlets by ISSR marker assay. Biologia Plantarum 51:22–26.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Klavina D,
   2. Gaillite A,
   3. Jakobsone G,
   4. Jevgenija N,
   5. Gavrilova G.

   2004. Tissue culture technology in conservation of threatened plant species of Latvia. Acta Universitatis Latviensis, Biology 676:183–188.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Kline GJ,
   2. Sorensen PD.

   2008. A revision of Agrimonia (Rosaceae) in North and Central America. Brittonia 60:11–33.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Leifert C,
   2. Ritchie JY,
   3. Waites WM.

   1991. Contaminants of plant-tissue and cell-cultures. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 7:452–469.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Misra P,
   2. Chakrabarty D.

   2009. Clonal propagation of Rosa clinophylla Thory. through axillary bud culture. Scientia Horticulturae 119:212–216.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Murashige T,
   2. Skoog F.

   1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15:473–497.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Nuzzo VA,
    2. Maerz JC,
    3. Blossey B.

    2009. Earthworm invasion as the driving force behind plant invasion and community change in northeastern North American forests. Conservation Biology 23:966–974.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 1. Pence VC.

    2011. Evaluating costs for the in vitro propagation and preservation of endangered plants. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology–Plant 47:176–187.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Reed BM,
    2. Viswambharan S,
    3. Kane M,
    4. Bunn E,
    5. Pence C.

    2011. Biodiversity conservation and conservation biotechnology tools. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology–Plant 47:1–4.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Ruffoni B,
    2. Savona M.

    2013. Physiological and biochemical analysis of growth abnormalities associated with plant tissue culture. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 54:191–205.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Sarasan V,
    2. Cripps R,
    3. Ramsay MM,
    4. Atherton C,
    5. McMichen M,
    6. Prendergast G,
    7. Rowntree JK.

    2006. Conservation in vitro of threatened plants: progress in the past decade. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology–Plant 42:206–214.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

    . 1995. The PLANTS database. Northeast wetland flora: field office guide to plant species. Northeast National Technical Center, Chester, 27401-4901. URL: http://plants.usda.gov. Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
16. 1. Waegel AS.

    2003. Stepwise disinfestation reduces contamination of Huperzia lucidula shoot-tips and gemmae. Hortscience 38:565–567.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Wilcove DS,
    2. Rothstein D,
    3. Dubow J,
    4. Phillips A,
    5. Losos E.

    1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text