Producing native plant materials for restoration: 10 rules to collect and maintain genetic diversity

REFERENCES

1. 1. Ågren J,
   2. Schemske DW.

   2012. Reciprocal transplants demonstrate strong adaptive differentiation of the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana in its native range. New Phytologist 194(4):1112–1122.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 1. Altizer S,
   2. Harvell D,
   3. Friedle E.

   2003. Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18(11):589–596.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. [AOSCA] Association of Official Seed Certifying Agencies

   . 2003. The AOSCA Native Plant Connection. URL: http://www.aosca.org/Site-Content/Documents/aoscanativeplantbrochure.pdf (accessed 8 Jan 2015).
4. 1. Baack EJ.

   2005. Ecological factors influencing tetraploid establishment in snow buttercups (Ranunculus adoneus, Ranunculaceae): minority cytotype exclusion and barriers to triploid formation. American Journal of Botany 92(11):1827–1835.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 1. Barrett JA.

   1981. The evolutionary consequences of monoculture. In: Bishop JA, Cook LM, editors. Genetic consequences of man-made change. London: Academic Press. p 209–246.
6. 1. Baskin CC,
   2. Baskin JM.

   2001. Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. 666 p.
7. 1. Bennington CC,
   2. Fetcher N,
   3. Vavrek MC,
   4. Shaver GR,
   5. Cummings KJ,
   6. McGraw JB.

   2012. Home site advantage in two long-lived arctic plant species: results from two 30-year reciprocal transplant studies. Journal of Ecology 100(4):841–851.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Bonner F.

   2003. Collection and care of acorns: a practical guide for seed collectors and nursery managers. v 1.1. 28 p. URL: http://www.nsl.fs.fed.us/collection%20and%20care%20of%20acorns.pdf (accessed 8 Jan 2015).
9. 1. Bonner FT,
   2. Karrfalt RP

   , editors. 2008. The woody plant seed manual. Agriculture Handbook 727. URL: http://www.nsl.fs.fed.us/nsl_wpsm.html (accessed 8 Jan 2015). Washington (DC): USDA Forest Service.
10. 1. Bower AD,
    2. St Clair JB,
    3. Erickson V.

    2014. Generalized provisional seed zones for native plants. Ecological Applications 24:913–919.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 1. Breed MF,
    2. Stead MG,
    3. Ottewell KM,
    4. Gardner MG,
    5. Lowe AJ.

    2013. Which provenance and where? Seed sourcing strategies for revegetation in a changing environment. Conservation Genetics 14(1):1–10.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Broadhurst LM,
    2. Lowe A,
    3. Coates DJ,
    4. Cunningham SA,
    5. McDonald M,
    6. Vesk PA,
    7. Yates C.

    2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications 1(4):587–597.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
13. 1. Cabin RJ,
    2. Evans AS,
    3. Mitchell RJ.

    1997. Genetic effects of germination timing and environment: an experimental investigation. Evolution 51(5):1427–1434.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Cai HW,
    2. Morishima H.

    2000. Genomic regions affecting seed shattering and seed dormancy in rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100(6):840–846.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Clewell A,
    2. Aronson J.

    2013. The SER primer and climate change. Ecological Management & Restoration 14(3):182–186.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Conesa HM,
    2. García G,
    3. Faz Á,
    4. Arnaldos R.

    2007. Dynamics of metal tolerant plant communities’ development in mine tailings from the Cartagena-La Unión Mining District (SE Spain) and their interest for further revegetation purposes. Chemosphere 68(6):1180–1185.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. 1. Corre VL.

    2005. Variation at two flowering time genes within and among populations of Arabidopsis thaliana: comparison with markers and traits. Molecular Ecology 14(13):4181–4192.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 1. Crawford KM,
    2. Rudgers JA.

    2012a. Genetic diversity within a dominant plant outweighs plant species diversity in structuring an arthropod community. Ecology 94(5):1025–1035.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Crawford KM,
    2. Rudgers JA.

    2012b. Plant species diversity and genetic diversity within a dominant species interactively affect plant community biomass. Journal of Ecology 100(6):1512–1521.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Crawford KM,
    2. Whitney KD.

    2011. Population genetic diversity influences colonization success. Molecular Ecology 19(6):1253–1263.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Crossa J,
    2. Vencovsky R.

    2011. Basic sampling strategies: theory and practice. In: Collecting plant genetic diversity: technical guidelines. 28 p. URL: http://cropgenebank.sgrp.cgiar.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=671 (accessed 8 Jan 2015).
22. 1. Dalling JW,
    2. Hubbell SP.

    2002. Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species. Journal of Ecology 90(3):557–568.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Doede DL.

    2005. Genetic variation in broadleaf lupine (Lupinus latifolius) on the Mt Hood National Forest and implications for seed collection and deployment. Native Plants Journal 6(1):36–48.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 1. Dolan RW,
    2. Marr DL,
    3. Schnabel A.

    2008. Capturing genetic variation during ecological restorations: an example from Kankakee Sands in Indiana. Restoration Ecology 16(3):386–396.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Duminil J,
    2. Fineschi S,
    3. Hampe A,
    4. Jordano P,
    5. Salvini D,
    6. Vendramin GG,
    7. Petit RJ.

    2007. Can population genetic structure be predicted from life-history traits? American Naturalist 169(5):662–672.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 1. Ensslin A,
    2. Sandner TM,
    3. Matthies D.

    2011. Consequences of ex situ cultivation of plants: genetic diversity, fitness and adaptation of the monocarpic Cynoglossum officinale L. in botanic gardens. Biological Conservation 144:(1)272–278.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Fahnestock JT,
    2. Detling JK.

    2000. Morphological and physiological responses of perennial grasses to long-term grazing in the Pryor Mountains, Montana. American Midland Naturalist 143(2):312–320.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Falk DA,
    2. Knapp EE,
    3. Guerrant EO.

    2001. Introduction to restoration genetics. URL: http://www.ser.org/docs/default-document-library/ser_restoration_genetics.pdf?sfvrsn=0 (accessed 8 Jan 2015). Society for Ecological Restoration. 33 p.
29. 1. Fant JB,
    2. Holmstrom RM,
    3. Sirkin E,
    4. Etterson JR,
    5. Masi S.

    2008. Genetic structure of threatened native populations and propagules used for restoration in a clonal species, American beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata Fern.). Restoration Ecology 16(4):594–603.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Fant JB,
    2. Havens K,
    3. Keller JM,
    4. Radosavljevic A,
    5. Yates ED.

    2014. The influence of contemporary and historic landscape features on the genetic structure of the sand dune endemic, Cirsium pitcheri (Asteraceae). Heredity 112(5):519–530.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 1. Ferrero-Serrano Á,
    2. Hild AL,
    3. Mealor BA.

    2011. Can invasive species enhance competitive ability and restoration potential in native grass populations? Restoration Ecology 19(4):545–551.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Foley ME,
    2. Fennimore SA.

    1998. Genetic basis for seed dormancy. Seed Science Research 8(2):173–182.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Frankham R,
    2. Ballou J,
    3. Briscoe D.

    2010. Introduction to conservation genetics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 617 p.
34. 1. Frankham R,
    2. Ballou JD,
    3. Eldridge MDB,
    4. Lacy RC,
    5. Ralls K,
    6. Dudash MR,
    7. Fenster CB.

    2011. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conservation Biology 25(3):465–475.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 1. Gibbs JP,
    2. Smart LB,
    3. Newhouse AE,
    4. Leopold DJ.

    2012. A molecular and fitness evaluation of commercially available versus locally collected blue lupine Lupinus perennis L. seeds for use in ecosystem restoration efforts. Restoration Ecology 20(4):456–461.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Gu XY,
    2. Kianian SF,
    3. Foley ME.

    2004. Multiple loci and epistases control genetic variation for seed dormancy in weedy rice (Oryza sativa). Genetics 166(3):1503–1516.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. 1. Guerrant EO,
    2. Havens K,
    3. Maunder M.

    2004. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington (DC): Island Press. 504 p.
38. 1. Hale ML,
    2. Burg TM,
    3. Steeves TE.

    2012. Sampling for microsatellite-based population genetic studies: 25 to 30 individuals per population is enough to accurately estimate allele frequencies. PLoS ONE 7(9):e45170.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
39. 1. Hare JD.

    1980. Variation in fruit size and susceptibility to seed predation among and within populations of the cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. Oecologia 46(2):217–222.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Harlan JR.

    1971. Agricultural origins: centers and noncenters. Science 174:468–474.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
41. 1. Harris JA,
    2. Hobbs RJ,
    3. Higgs E,
    4. Aronson J.

    2006. Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14(2):170–176.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Havens K,
    2. Guerrant EO,
    3. Maunder M,
    4. Vitt P.

    2004. Guidelines for ex situ conservation collection management: minimizing risks. In: Guerrant EO, Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 454–473.
43. 1. Havens K,
    2. Vitt P,
    3. Still S,
    4. Kramer A,
    5. Fant JB,
    6. Schatz K.

    2015. Seed sourcing for restoration in an era of climate change. Natural Areas Journal 35(1): forthcoming.
44. 1. Herman B,
    2. Packard S,
    3. Pollack C,
    4. Houseal G,
    5. Sinn S,
    6. O’Leary C,
    7. Fant J,
    8. Lewis AD,
    9. Wagenius S,
    10. Gustafson D.

    2014. Decisions . . . decisions . . . how to source plant material for native plant restoration projects. Ecological Restoration 32(3):236–238.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
45. 1. Hoban S,
    2. Schlarbaum S.

    2014. Optimal sampling of seeds from plant populations for ex-situ conservation of genetic biodiversity, considering realistic population structure. Biological Conservation 177:90–99.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Hoskinson PE,
    2. Qualset CO.

    1967. Geographic variation in Balboa rye. 62(2):8–9.
47. 1. Hufford K,
    2. Mazer SJ.

    2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18(3):147–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Hughes AR,
    2. Stachowicz JJ.

    2004. Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(24):8998–9002.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
49. 1. Johnson GR,
    2. Sorensen FC,
    3. St Clair JB,
    4. Croon RC.

    2004. Pacific Northwest forest tree seed zones: a template for native plants? Native Plants Journal 5(2):131–140.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
50. 1. Johnson GR,
    2. Stritch L,
    3. Olwell P,
    4. Lambert S,
    5. Horning ME,
    6. Cronn R.

    2010. What are the best seed sources for ecosystem restoration on BLM and USFS lands? Native Plants Journal 11(2):117–131.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
51. 1. Johnson MTJ,
    2. Agrawal AA.

    2005. Plant genotype and environment interact to shape a diverse arthropod community on evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). Ecology 86(4):874–885.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Johnson RC,
    2. Cashman MJ,
    3. Vance-Borland K.

    2012. Genecology and seed zones for Indian ricegrass collected in the southwestern United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 65(5):523–532.

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Jump AS,
    2. Marchant R,
    3. Peñuelas J.

    2009. Environmental change and the option value of genetic diversity. Trends in Plant Science 14(1):51–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
54. 1. Kalisz S.

    1986. Variable selection on the timing of germination in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 40(3):479–491.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. 1. Karron JD,
    2. Holmquist KG,
    3. Flanagan RJ,
    4. Mitchell RJ.

    2009. Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate. Annals of Botany 103(9):1379–1383.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
56. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

    1990. Managing genetic diversity in a tree improvement program. Forest Ecology and Management 35(1–2):131–149.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. 1. Knapp EE,
    2. Rice KJ.

    1994. Starting from seed: genetic issues in using native grasses for restoration. Restoration & Management Notes 12(1):40–45.

    OpenUrl
58. 1. Konnert M,
    2. Ruetz W.

    2003. Influence of nursery practices on the genetic structure of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedling populations. Forest Ecology and Management 184(1–3):193–200.

    OpenUrl
59. 1. Kramer A,
    2. Larkin D,
    3. Fant JB.

    2015. Assessing potential seed transfer zones for five forb species in the Great Basin. Natural Areas Journal 35(1):forthcoming.
60. 1. Kulpa SM,
    2. Leger EA.

    2013. Strong natural selection during plant restoration favors an unexpected suite of plant traits. Evolutionary Applications 6(3):510–523.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
61. 1. Lawrence MJ,
    2. Marshall DF,
    3. Davies P.

    1995. Genetics of genetic conservation. I. Sample size when collecting germplasm. Euphytica 84(2):89–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
62. 1. Leger EA.

    2008. The adaptive value of remnant native plants in invaded communities: an example from the Great Basin. Ecological Applications 18(5):1226–1235.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
63. 1. Leimu R,
    2. Fischer M.

    2008. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 3(12):e4010.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
64. 1. Leimu R,
    2. Mutikainen P,
    3. Koricheva J,
    4. Fischer M.

    2006. How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? Journal of Ecology 94(5):942–952.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. 1. Lesica P,
    2. Allendorf FW.

    1999. Ecological genetics and restoration of plant communities: mix or match? Restoration Ecology 7:42–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. 1. Li B,
    2. Foley ME.

    1997. Genetic and molecular control of seed dormancy. Trends in Plant Science 2(10):384–389.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
67. 1. Linhart YB,
    2. Grant MC.

    1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:237–277.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
68. 1. Love SL,
    2. Tripepi RR,
    3. Salaiz T.

    2014. Influence of harvest timing and storage interval on rabbitbrush seed germination, emergence, and viability. Native Plants Journal 15(2):98–108.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
69. 1. Luna T,
    2. Wilkinson KM.

    2009. Collecting, processing, and storing seeds. In: Dumroese RK, Luna T, Landis TD, editors. Nursery manual for native plants: guide for tribal nurseries. Volume 1: Nursery management. Agriculture Handbook 730. Washington (DC): USDA Forest Service. p 113–131.
70. 1. MacKay J.

    1993. Seed source selection and genetic improvement of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Québec. Annales des sciences forestières 50(Supplement):420s–424s.

    OpenUrl
71. 1. Mahalovich MF,
    2. McArthur ED.

    2004. Sagebrush (Artemisa spp.) seed and plant transfer guidelines. Native Plants Journal 5(2):149–151.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
72. 1. Maschinski J,
    2. Haskins KE.

    2012. Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Washington (DC): Island Press. 432 p.
73. 1. Maschinski J,
    2. Sirkin E,
    3. Fant J.

    2010. Using genetic and morphological analysis to distinguish endangered taxa from their hybrids with the cultivated exotic pest plant Lantana strigocamara (syn: Lantana camara). Conservation Genetics 11:1607–1621.

    OpenUrl
74. 1. Mayrose M,
    2. Kane NC,
    3. Mayrose I,
    4. Dlugosch KM,
    5. Rieseberg LH.

    2011. Increased growth in sunflower correlates with reduced defences and altered gene expression in response to biotic and abiotic stress. Molecular Ecology 20(22):4683–4694.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
75. 1. McKay JK,
    2. Christian CE,
    3. Harrison S,
    4. Rice KJ.

    2005. “How local Is local?” A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13(3):432–440.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
76. 1. Menges ES,
    2. Guerrant EO,
    3. Hamze S.

    2004. Effects of seed collection on extinction risk of perennial plants. In: Guerrant EO, Havens K, Maunder M, editors. Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 305–324.
77. 1. Montalvo A,
    2. Rice SLW,
    3. Cory SLBC,
    4. Handel SN,
    5. Nabhan GP,
    6. Primack R,
    7. Robichaux RH.

    1997. Restoration biology: a population biology perspective. Restoration Ecology 5(4):277–290.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
78. 1. Obeso JR,
    2. Martínez I,
    3. García D.

    2011. Seed size is heterogeneously distributed among destination habitats in animal dispersed plants. Basic and Applied Ecology 12(2):134–140.

    OpenUrl
79. 1. Rees M.

    1996. Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 351(1345):1299–1308.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
80. 1. Reusch TBH,
    2. Ehlers A,
    3. Hammerli A,
    4. Worm B.

    2005. Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(2):2826–2831.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
81. 1. Reynolds LK,
    2. McGlathery KJ,
    3. Waycott M.

    2012. Genetic diversity enhances restoration success by augmenting ecosystem services. PLoS ONE 7(6):e38397.

    OpenUrlPubMed
82. 1. Rhodes MK,
    2. Fant JB,
    3. Skogen KA.

    2014. Local topography shapes finescale spatial genetic structure in the Arkansas Valley Evening Primrose, Oenothera harringtonii (Onagraceae). Journal of Heredity 105(6):806–815.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
83. 1. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ,
    2. Gil L.

    2005. Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94(1):13–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
84. 1. Rogers DL.

    2004. Genetic erosion: no longer just an agricultural issue. Native Plants Journal 5(2):113–122.

    OpenUrl
85. 1. Rowe CLJ,
    2. Leger EA.

    2011. Competitive seedlings and inherited traits: a test of rapid evolution of Elymus multisetus (big squirreltail) in response to cheatgrass invasion. Evolutionary Applications 4(3):485–498.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
86. 1. Saari C,
    2. Glisson W.

    2012. Survey of Chicago region restoration seed source policies. Ecological Restoration 30(3):162–165.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
87. 1. Schoen DJ,
    2. Brown AHD.

    2001. The conservation of wild plant species in seed banks. BioScience 51(11):960–966.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
88. 1. Schröder R,
    2. Prasse R.

    2013. From nursery into nature: a study on performance of cultivated varieties of native plants used in re-vegetation, their wild relatives and evolving wild x cultivar hybrids. Ecological Engineering 60:428–437.

    OpenUrl
89. 1. Shaw NL,
    2. Lambert SM,
    3. DeBolt AM,
    4. Pellant M.

    2005. Increasing native forb seed supplies for the Great Basin. In: Dumroese RK, Riley LE, Landis TD, technical coordinators. National proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations; 2004. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Proceedings RMRS-P-35. p 94-105. URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p035/rmrs_p035_094_102.pdf (accessed 8 Jan 2015).
90. 1. Silen RR,
    2. Osterhaus C.

    1979. Reduction of genetic base by sizing of bulk Douglas-fir seedlots. Tree Planters’ Notes 30:24–30.

    OpenUrl
91. 1. Smith SL,
    2. Sher AA,
    3. Grant TA.

    2007. Genetic diversity in restoration materials and the impacts of seed collection in Colorado’s restoration plant production industry. Restoration Ecology 15(3):369–374.

    OpenUrl
92. 1. Stanford EH,
    2. Laude HM,
    3. Enloe JA.

    1960. Effect of harvest dates and location on the genetic composition of the syn1 generation of Pilgrim Ladino Clover. Agronomy Journal 52(3):149–152.

    OpenUrl
93. 1. Thompson PA.

    1981. Variations in seed size within populations of Silene dioica (L.) Clairv. in relation to habitat. Annals of Botany 47(5):623–634.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
94. 1. Tooker JF,
    2. Frank SD.

    2012. Genotypically diverse cultivar mixtures for insect pest management and increased crop yields. Journal of Applied Ecology 49(5):974–985.

    OpenUrl
95. 1. Upadhyaya H,
    2. Kumar S,
    3. Gowda CLL,
    4. Singh S.

    2006. Two major genes for seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 147(3):311–315.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
96. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

    . 2015. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 12 Apr 2014). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
97. 1. [USDI BLM] USDI Bureau of Land Management

    . 2012. Technical protocol for the collection, study, and conservation of seeds from native plant species for seeds of success. 39 p. URL: http://www.blm.gov/sos (accessed 8 Jan 2015).
98. 1. Van Rossum F,
    2. Stiers I,
    3. Van Geert A,
    4. Triest L,
    5. Hardy O.

    2011. Fluorescent dye particles as pollen analogues for measuring pollen dispersal in an insect-pollinated forest herb. Oecologia 165(3):663–674.

    OpenUrlPubMed
99. 1. Vander Mijnsbrugge K,
    2. Bischoff A,
    3. Smith B.

    2010. A question of origin: where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology 11(4):300–311.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
100. 1. Vekemans X,
     2. Hardy OJ.

     2004. New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Molecular Ecology 13(4):921–935.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
101. 1. Vogler DW,
     2. Kalisz S.

     2001. Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55(1):202–204.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
102. 1. Walters C,
     2. Wheeler LM,
     3. Grotenhuis JM.

     2005. Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: species characteristics. Seed Science Research 15(01):1–20.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
103. 1. Walters C,
     2. Berjak P,
     3. Pammenter N,
     4. Kennedy K,
     5. Raven P.

     2013. Preservation of recalcitrant seeds. Science 339(6122):915–916.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
104. 1. Ward K,
     2. Gisler M,
     3. Fiegener R,
     4. Young A.

     2008. The Willamette Valley Seed Increase Program: developing genetically diverse germplasm using an ecoregion approach. Native Plants Journal 9(3):334–350.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
105. 1. Withrow-Robinson BA,
     2. Johnson R.

     2006. Selecting native plant materials for restoration projects: ensuring local adaptation and maintaining genetic diversity. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University Extension Service. URL: http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/20385 (accessed 8 Jan 2015).
106. 1. Youtie B,
     2. Shaw NL,
     3. Fisk M,
     4. Jensen S.

     2012. A strategy for maximizing native plant material diversity for ecological restoration, germplasm conservation and genecology research. In: 8th European Conference on Ecological Restoration. Ceské Budecjovice, Czech Republic. 4 p. URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_other/rmrs_2012_youtie_b001.pdf (accessed 8 Jan 2015).