Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleRefereed Research

Community response to false hellebore management: implications for harvest

Craig D Johnson, Val J Anderson and Rachel A Fugal
Native Plants Journal, September 2013, 14 (3) 249-256; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/npj.14.3.249
Craig D Johnson
, Graduate Student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Val J Anderson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel A Fugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. Anderson V,
    2. Thompson R
    . 1993. Chemical and mechanical control of false hellebore (Veratrum californicum) in an alpine community. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Research Paper INT-469. 6 p.
    1. Binns W,
    2. James LF,
    3. Shupe JL,
    4. Everett G
    . 1963. A congenital cyclopian-type malformation in lambs induced by maternal ingestion of a range plant, Veratrum californicum. American Journal of Veterinary Medicine 24:1164–1175.
    OpenUrl
    1. Chen JK,
    2. Taipale J,
    3. Cooper MK,
    4. Beachy PA
    . 2002. Inhibition of hedgehog signaling by direct binding of cyclopamine to smoothened. Genes and Development 16:2743–2748.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Cosgriff RL,
    2. Anderson VJ,
    3. Monsen S
    . 2004. Restoration of communities dominated by false hellebore. Journal of Range Management 57:365–370.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ellison L
    . 1954. Subalpine vegetation of the Wasatch Plateau, Utah. Ecological Monographs 24:89–184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Loft E,
    2. Menke J,
    3. Kie J,
    4. Bertram R
    . 1987. Influence of cattle stocking rate on the structural profile of deer hiding cover. Journal of Wildlife Management 51:655–664.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Olive KP,
    2. Jacobetz MA,
    3. Davidson CJ,
    4. Gopinathan A,
    5. McIntyre D
    others. 2009. Inhibition of hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 324:1457–1461.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rikhari HC,
    2. Negi GCS,
    3. Ram J,
    4. Singh SP
    . 1993. Human-induced secondary succession in an alpine meadow of central Himalaya, India. Arctic and Alpine Research 25:8–14.
    OpenUrl
    1. Spjut RW
    . 2011. Veratrum, corn lily, Melanthiaceae. URL: http://worldbotanical.com/veratrum.htm (accessed 31 Jan 2012). Bakersfield (CA): World Botanical Associates.
    1. Steele RGD,
    2. Torrie JH
    . 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill. 633 p.
    1. Taipale J,
    2. Chen JK,
    3. Cooper MK
    5 others. 2000. Effects of oncogenic mutations in Smoothened and Patched can be reversed by cyclopamine. Nature 406:1005–1009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Taylor CA
    . 1956. The culture of false hellebore. Economic Botany 10:155–165.
    OpenUrl
    1. Welsh SL,
    2. Atwood ND,
    3. Goodrich S,
    4. Higgins LC
    . 2003. A Utah flora. 3rd ed. Provo (UT): Brigham Young University, Print Services. 912 p.
  1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2012. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 31 Jan 2012). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
  2. [USDI BLM] USDI Bureau of Land Management. 1996. Sampling vegetation attributes: interagency technical reference. Denver (CO): Natural Applied Resource Sciences Center. Technical Reference 1734–4. 171 p.
    1. Williams MC
    . 1991. Twenty-year control of California false-hellebore. Weed Technology 5:40–42.
    OpenUrl
    1. Williams MC,
    2. Cronin EH
    . 1981. Ten-year control of western false hellebore (Veratrum californicum). Weed Science 29:22–23.
    OpenUrl
    1. Williams MC,
    2. Kreps L
    . 1970. Chemical control of western false hellebore. Weed Science 18:481–483.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 14 (3)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 14, Issue 3
21 Sep 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Community response to false hellebore management: implications for harvest
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Community response to false hellebore management: implications for harvest
Craig D Johnson, Val J Anderson, Rachel A Fugal
Native Plants Journal Sep 2013, 14 (3) 249-256; DOI: 10.3368/npj.14.3.249

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Community response to false hellebore management: implications for harvest
Craig D Johnson, Val J Anderson, Rachel A Fugal
Native Plants Journal Sep 2013, 14 (3) 249-256; DOI: 10.3368/npj.14.3.249
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Influences of growing media particle size and nutrient addition on desert shrub propagation and field outplanting survival
  • Aspen (Populus tremuloides) germination is dependent on seed ripeness at collection and not seed age: A 12-y study of aspen seeds in long-term storage
  • The effect of timing of gibberellic acid application and concentrations on seed germination characteristics in red osier dogwood, Canadian buffaloberry, and green alder
Show more Refereed Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • harvest response
  • plant community recovery
  • disturbance
  • Veratrum californicum
  • Liliaceae
  • USDA NRCS (2013)
UW Press logo

© 2026 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire