Use of low nitrogen fertilizer as a strategy for maintaining mycorrhizal colonization on whitebark pine seedlings inoculated with native fungi in the greenhouse

REFERENCES

1. 1. Aime MC,
   2. Miller OK Jr..

   2002. Delayed germination of basidiospores in temperate species of Crepidotus (Fr.) Staude. Canadian Journal of Botany 80(3):280–87.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Amaranthus MP

   . 2002. Around the world nursery inoculations and conifer establishment using Rhizopogon mycorrhizal fungi. In: Dumroese RK, Riley LE, Landis TD, coordinators and editors. National proceedings: forest and conservation nursery associations, 1999, 2000, and 2001. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Proceedings RMRS-P-24. p 226.
3. 1. Amaranthus MP,
   2. Nair MG,
   3. Reid TC,
   4. Steinfeld D

   . 2005. Improved Rhizopogon mycorrhizal colonization and foliar nutrient levels in Ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir with Myconate.^® Journal of Sustainable Forestry 20(3):1–14.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Arnebrant K

   . 1994. Nitrogen amendments reduce the growth of extramatrical ectomycorrhizal mycelium. Mycorrhiza 5(1):7–15.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Boyle CD,
   2. Robertson WJ

   . 1987. Use of mycelial slurries of mycorrhizal fungi as inoculum for commercial tree seedling nurseries. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17(12):1480–1486.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Brundrett M,
   2. Malajczuk N,
   3. Mingquin G,
   4. Daping X,
   5. Snelling S,
   6. Dell B

   . 2005. Nursery inoculation of Eucalyptus seedlings in western Australia and southern China using spores and mycelial inoculum of diverse ectomycorrhizal fungi from different climatic regions. Forest Ecology and Management 209:193–205.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Brunner I,
   2. Brodbeck S

   . 2001. Response of mycorrhizal Norway spruce seedlings to various nitrogen loads and sources. Environmental Pollution 114:223–233.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 1. Bruns TD,
   2. Bidartondo MI,
   3. Taylor L

   . 2002. Host specificity in ectomycorrhizal communities: what do the exceptions tell us? Integrative and Comparative Biology 42:352–359.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 1. Burr K,
   2. Eramian A,
   3. Eggleston K

   . 2001. Growing whitebark pine seedlings for restoration. In: Tomback DF, Arno SF, Keane RE, coordinators and editors. Whitebark pine communities: ecology and restoration. Washington (DC): Island Press. p 325–345.
10. 1. Castellano MA

    . 1996. Outplanting performance of mycorrhizal inoculated seedlings. In: Mukerji KG, coordinator and editor. Concepts in mycorrhizal research. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 223–301.
11. 1. Castellano MA,
    2. Molina R

    . 1989. Mycorrhizae. In: Landis TD, Tinus RW, McDonald SE, Bamett JP, coordinators and editors. The container tree nursery manual. Volume 5, The biological component: nursery pests and mycorrhizae. Washington (DC): USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 674. p 101–167.
12. 1. Castellano MA,
    2. Trappe JM,
    3. Molina R

    . 1985. Inoculation of container-grown Douglas-fir seedlings with basidiospores of Rhizopogon vinicolor and R. colossus: effects of fertility and spore application rate. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 15:10–13.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Chakravarty P,
    2. Chataropaul L

    . 1989. Effect of fertilization on seedling growth, ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, and nutrient uptake in Larix laricina. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20:245–248.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Cripps CL,
    2. Antibus RK

    . 2011. Native ectomycorrhizal fungi of limber and whitebark pine: necessary for forest sustainability? In: Keane RE, Tomback DF, Murray MP, Smith CM, coordinators and editors. The future of high-elevation, five-needle white pines in Western North America: proceedings of the High Five Symposium. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Proceedings RMRS-P-63. p 37–44.
15. 1. Cripps CL,
    2. Grimme E

    . 2011. Inoculation and successful colonization of whitebark pine seedlings with native mycorrhizal fungi under greenhouse conditions. In: Keane RE, Tomback DF, Murray MP, Smith CM, coordinators and editors. The future of high-elevation, five-needle white pines in Western North America: proceedings of the High Five Symposium. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Proceedings RMRS-P-63. p 312–322.
16. 1. Cripps CL,
    2. Smith CM,
    3. Carolin T,
    4. Lapp J

    . 2008. Ectomycorrhizal fungi with whitebark pine. Nutcracker Notes 14:12–14.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Diaz G,
    2. Carrilla C,
    3. Honrubia M

    . 2010. Mycorrhization, growth, and nutrition of Pinus halepensis seedlings fertilized with different doses and sources of nitrogen. Annals of Forest Science 67(405):1–9.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Dominguez-Lerena S,
    2. Herrero Sierra N,
    3. Carrasco Manzano I,
    4. Ocana Bueno L,
    5. Penuelas Rubira JL,
    6. Mexal JG

    . 2006. Container characteristics influence Pinus pinea seedling development in the nursery and field. Forest Ecology and Management 221(1):63–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Dumroese RK

    . 2008. Observations on root disease of container whitebark pine seedlings treated with biological controls. Native Plants Journal 9(2):92–97.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 1. Dumroese RK,
    2. Page-Dumroese DS,
    3. Salifu KF,
    4. Jacobs DF

    . 2005. Exponential fertilization of Pinus monticola seedlings: nutrient uptake efficiency, leaching fractions, and early outplanting performance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35:2961–2967.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Eggleston K

    . 2010. Personal communication. Coeur d’Alene (ID): USDA Forest Service Nursery, Nursery Manager.
22. 1. Ekwebelam SA,
    2. Reid CPP

    . 1983. Effects of light, nitrogen fertilization, and mycorrhizal fungi on growth and photosynthesis of lodgepole pine seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13(6):1099–1106.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Ellison AM,
    2. Bank MS,
    3. Clinton BD

    , and 17 others. 2005. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:479–486.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Gagne A,
    2. Jany JL,
    3. Bousquet J,
    4. Khasa J,
    5. Gamase P

    . 2006. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of nursery-inoculated seedlings out-planted on clear-cut sites in northern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:1684–1694.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Gagnon J,
    2. Langlois CG,
    3. Fortin JA

    . 1988. Growth and ectomycorrhiza formation of containerized black spruce seedlings as affected by nitrogen fertilization, inoculum type, and symbionts. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18:922–929.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Heumader J

    . 1992. Cultivation of cembran pine plants for high-elevation afforestations. In: Schmidt WC, Holtmeier FK, compilers. Proceedings, international workshop on subalpine stone pines and their environment: the status of our knowledge. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report INT-GTR-309. p 298–301.
27. 1. IBM Corporation

    . 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corporation.
28. 1. Index Fungorum

    . 2012. Index Fungorum. URL: http://www.Indexfungorum/Names/Names.asp (accessed 22 May 2012). Lincoln (NZ): Landcare Research and Kew (UK): Royal Botanic Gardens.
29. 1. [ITIS] Integrated Taxonomic Information System

    . 2012. Integrated Taxonomic Information System. URL: http://www.itis.gov (accessed 22 May 2012). Washington (DC): National Museum of Natural History.
30. 1. Izlar K

    . 2007. Assessment of whitebark pine seedling survival for Rocky Mountain plantings [MSc thesis]. Missoula (MT): University of Montana. 84 p.
31. 1. Jackson DP,
    2. Dumroese RK,
    3. Barnett JP

    . 2012. Nursery response of container Pinus palustris seedlings to nitrogen supply and subsequent effects on outplanting performance. Forest Ecology and Management 265:1–12.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. James RL,
    2. Burr KE

    . 2000. Diseases associated with whitebark pine seedling production. Coeur d’Alene (ID): USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Forest Health Protection. Report 00-8. 8 p.
33. 1. Keane RE,
    2. Parsons RA

    . 2010. Management guide to ecosystem restoration treatments: whitebark pine forests of the northern Rocky Mountains, U.S.A. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRS GTR-232. 133 p.
34. 1. Keane RE,
    2. Tomback DF,
    3. Aubry CA

    , and 13 others. 2012. A range-wide restoration strategy for whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis). Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-279. 106 p.
35. 1. Keller G

    . 1996. Utilization of inorganic and organic nitrogen sources by high-subalpine ectomycorrhizal fungi of Pinus cembra in pure culture. Mycological Research 100:989–998.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. 1. Khasa PD,
    2. Sigler L,
    3. Chakravarty P,
    4. Dancik BP,
    5. Erickson L,
    6. McCurdy D

    . 2001. Effect of fertilization on growth and ectomycorrhizal development of container-grown and bare-root nursery conifer seedlings. New Forests 22:179–197.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Khasa PD,
    2. Piche Y,
    3. Coughlan AP

    . 2009. Advances in mycorrhizal science and technology. Ottawa (ON): NRC Research Press. 197 p.
38. 1. Landis TD,
    2. Tinus RW,
    3. McDonald SE,
    4. Barnett JP

    . 1989a. The container tree nursery manual. Volume 4, Seedling nutrition and irrigation. Washington (DC): USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 674. 119 p.
39. 1. Landis TD,
    2. Tinus RW,
    3. McDonald SE,
    4. Barnett JP

    . 1989b. The container tree nursery manual. Volume 5, The biological component: nursery pests and mycorrhizae. Washington (DC): USDA Forest Servicejournal, Agriculture Handbook 674. 171 p.
40. 1. Landis TD,
    2. Tinus RW,
    3. McDonald SE,
    4. Barnett JP

    . 1990. The container tree nursery manual. Volume 2, Containers and growing media. Washington (DC): USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 674. 88 p.
41. 1. Landis TD,
    2. Seinfeld DE,
    3. Dumroese RK

    . 2010. Native plant containers for restoration projects. Native Plants Journal 11(3):341–348.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
42. 1. Lantz G

    . 2010. Whitebark pine: an ecosystem in peril. Norman (OK): American Forests Special Report. 8 p.
43. 1. Lehto T,
    2. Zwiazek J

    . 2011. Ectomycorrhizas and water relations of trees: a review. Mycorrhiza 21(2):71–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 1. Logan J,
    2. Mcfarlane W,
    3. Wilcox L

    . 2010. Whitebark pine vulnerability to climate driven mountain pine beetle disturbance in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Ecological Applications 20(40):895–902.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 1. Mahalovitch MF,
    2. Dickerson GA

    . 2004. Whitebark pine genetic restoration program for the Intermountain West (USA). In: Sniezko R, Samman S, Schlarbaum S, Kriebel H, editors. Breeding and genetic resources of five-needle pines: growth, adaptability and pest resistance, IUFRO Working Part 2.02.15, Proceedings. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Proceedings RMRS-P-32 p 181–187.
46. 1. Marx DH,
    2. Cordell CE

    . 1988. Specific ectomycorrhizae improve reforestation and reclamation in eastern United States. In: Lalonde M, Piché Y, coordinators and editors. Symposium proceedings, Canadian workshop on mycorrhizae in forestry; 1988 May 1–4; Centre de recherché en biologie forestiére, Facult de foresterie et de géodesie, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Qué.
47. 1. Meikle TW,
    2. Amaranthus M

    . 2008. The influence of fertilization regime and mycorrhizal inoculum on outplanting success: a field trial of containerized seedlings in Oregon. Native Plants Journal 9(2):107–116.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
48. 1. Menkis A,
    2. Vasiliauskas R,
    3. Taylor AFS,
    4. Senlid J,
    5. Finlay R

    . 2007. Afforestation of abandoned farmland with conifer seedlings inoculated with three ectomycorrhizal fungi: impact on plant performance and ectomycorrhizal community. Mycorrhiza 17(4):337–348.

    OpenUrlPubMed
49. 1. Mohatt KR,
    2. Cripps CL,
    3. Lavin M

    . 2008. Ectomycorrhizal fungi of whitebark pine (a tree in peril) revealed by sporocarps and molecular analysis of mycorrhizae from treeline forests in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Botany 86:14–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. 1. Moser MM

    . 1956. Die Bedeutung der Mykorrhiza fur Aufforestungen in Hochlagen. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 75:8–18.

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Moser MM

    . 2004. Subalpine conifer forests in the Alps, the Altai and the Rocky Mountains: a comparison of their fungal populations. In: Cripps CL, coordinator and editor. Fungi in forest ecosystems: systematics, diversity, and ecology. New York (NY): New York Garden Botanical Press. p 151–158.
52. 1. Ortega U,
    2. Dunabeitia M,
    3. Mendez S,
    4. Gonzalez-Murua C,
    5. Majada J

    . 2004. Effectiveness of mycorrhizal inoculation in the nursery on growth and water relations of Pinus radiata in different water regimes. Tree Physiology 24:65–73.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
53. 1. Parladé J,
    2. Luque J,
    3. Pera J,
    4. Rincón AM

    . 2004. Field performance of Pinus pinea and P. halepensis seedlings inoculated with Rhizopogon spp. and outplanted in formerly arable land. Annals of Forest Science 61:507–514.

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Pinto JR,
    2. Marshall JD,
    3. Dumroese RK,
    4. Davis AS,
    5. Cobos DR

    . 2011. Establishment and growth of container seedlings for reforestation: a function of stocktype and edaphic conditions. Forest Ecology and Management 261:1876–1884.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Quoreshi AM,
    2. Timmer VR

    . 1998. Exponential fertilization increases nutrient uptake and ectomycorrhizal development of black spruce seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28:674–682.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. 1. Quoreshi AM,
    2. Kernaghan G,
    3. Hunt GA

    . 2009. Mycorrhizal fungi in Canadian forest nurseries and field performance of inoculated seedlings. In: Khasa PD, Piche Y, Coughlan AP, coordinators and editors. Advances in mycorrhizal science and technology. Ottawa (ON): NRC Research Press. p 115–128.
57. 1. Repáč I

    . 1996a. Inoculation of Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings with vegetative inocula of ectomycorrhizal fungi Suillus bovinus (L.:Fr.) O. Kuntze and Inocybe lacera (Fr.) Kumm. New Forests 12:41–54.

    OpenUrl
58. 1. Repáč I

    . 1996b. Effects of forest litter on mycorrhiza formation and growth of container-grown Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) seedlings. Lesnictvĭ 42:317–324.

    OpenUrl
59. 1. Repáč I

    . 2007. Ectomycorrhiza formation and growth of Picea abies seedlings inoculated with alginate-bead fungal inoculum in peat and bark compost substrates. Forestry 80(5):517–530.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
60. 1. Repáč I

    . 2011. Ectomycorrhizal inoculum and inoculation techniques. In: Rai M, Varma A, coordinators and editors. Diversity and biotechnology of ectomycorrhizae, soil biology. Volume 25. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p 43–63.
61. 1. Rikala R,
    2. Heiskanen J,
    3. Lahti M

    . 2004. Autumn fertilization in the nursery affects growth of Picea abies container seedlings after transplanting. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19(5):409–414.

    OpenUrl
62. 1. Rincón A,
    2. Parlade J,
    3. Pera J

    . 2005. Effects of ectomycorrhizal inoculation and the type of substrate on mycorrhization, growth and nutrition of containerized Pinus pinea L. seedlings produced in a commercial nursery. Annals of Forest Science 62:817–822.

    OpenUrl
63. 1. Rincón A,
    2. de Felipe MR,
    3. Fernández-Pascual M

    . 2007. Inoculation of Pinus halepensis Mill. with selected ectomycorrhizal fungi improves seedling establishment 2 years after planting in a degraded gypsum soil. Mycorrhiza 18:23–32.

    OpenUrlPubMed
64. 1. Schmid V

    . 2006. Entwicklung molekularer methoden für ein schnelles und kostengünstiges monitoring der inokulation von forstpflanzen mit ektomykorrhizasymbionten [PhD dissertation]. Innsbruck, Austria: University of Innsbruck.
65. 1. Schwandt J

    . 2006. Whitebark pine in peril: a case for restoration. Coeur d’Alene (ID): USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Forest Health Protection. Report R1-06-28. 20 p.
66. 1. Smith SE,
    2. Read DJ

    . 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. 787 p.
67. 1. Steinfeld D,
    2. Amaranthus M,
    3. Cazares E

    . 2003. Survival of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. Ex Laws.) seedlings out-planted with Rhizopogon mycorrhizae inoculated with spores at the nursery. Journal of Arboriculture 29(4):197–208.

    OpenUrl
68. 1. Timmer VR

    . 1996 Exponential nutrient loading: a new fertilization technique to improve seedlings performance on competitive sites. New Forests 13:275–295.

    OpenUrl
69. 1. Tomback DF,
    2. Achuff P

    . 2010. Blister rust and western forest biodiversity: ecology, values, and outlook for white pines. Forest Pathology 40:186–225.

    OpenUrl
70. 1. Torres P,
    2. Honrubia M

    . 1994. Basidiospore viability in stored slurries. Mycological Research 98(5):527–530.

    OpenUrl
71. 1. Treu R

    . 1990. Suillus sibiricus. In: Agerer R, coordinator and editor. Colour atlas of ectomycorrhizae, plate 47. Schwäbisch Gmünd (Germany): Einhorn-Verlag.
72. 1. Trusty P,
    2. Cripps CL

    . 2011. Influence of fire on mycorrhizal colonization of planted and natural whitebark pine seedlings: ecology and management implications. In: Keane RE, Tomback DF, Murray MP, Smith CM, coordinators and editors. The future of high-elevation, five-needle white pines in Western North America: proceedings of the High Five Symposium. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Proceedings RMRS-P-63. p 198–202.
73. 1. van den Driessche R

    . 1987. Nursery growth of conifer seedlings using fertilizers of different solubilities and application time, and their forest growth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18:172–173.

    OpenUrl
74. 1. Wallander H,
    2. Nylund JE

    . 1991. Effects of excess nitrogen on carbohydrate concentration and mycorrhizal development of Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings. New Phytologist 119:405–411.

    OpenUrl
75. 1. Weisleitner H

    . 2008. Personal communication. Innsbruck (Austria): Federal Nursery of Austria. Nursery Manager.
76. 1. Whipps JM

    . 2004. Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens. Canadian Journal of Botany 82:1198–1227.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
77. 1. Wiensczyk G,
    2. Durall D,
    3. Jones M,
    4. Simard S

    . 2002. Ectomycorrhizae and forestry in British Columbia: a summary of current research and conservation strategies. Journal of Ecosystems and Management 2(1):1–20.

    OpenUrl