Conservation and reintroduction of the endangered Willamette daisy: effects of population size on seed viability and the influence of local adaptation

REFERENCES

1. 1. Agren J

   1996. Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology 77:1779–1790.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Allphin L,
   2. Wiens D,
   3. Harper KT

   2002. The relative effects of resources and genetics on reproductive success in the rare Kachina daisy, Erigeron kachinensis (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163:599–612.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Clark DL,
   2. Finley KK,
   3. Ingersoll CA

   1993. Status report for Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens. Report to Conservation Biology Program, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Salem, Oregon.
4. 1. Clark DL,
   2. Ingersoll CA,
   3. Finley KK

   1995. Regeneration biology of Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens, an endangered plant of the Willamette Valley. Report for Oregon Department of Agriculture, Plant Conservation Biology Program, Salem, Oregon.
5. 1. Climate Leadership Initiative and the National Center for Conservation Science and Policy

   2009. Preparing for climate change in the upper Willamette River basin of western Oregon: co-beneficial planning for communities and ecosystems. Unpublished report. 47+ pp. URL: http://www.geosinstitute.org/images/stories/pdfs/Publications/ClimateWise/UpperWillametteBasinReport3-24-09FINAL.pdf (accessed 15 Nov 2010).
6. 1. Demauro MM

   1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the Lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7:542–550.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Doppelt B,
   2. Hamilton R,
   3. Williams CD,
   4. Koopman M,
   5. Vynne S

   2009. Preparing for climate change in the upper Willamette River basin of western Oregon: co-beneficial planning for communities and ecosystems. Prepared by Climate Leadership Initiative, Institute for Sustainable Environment, the National Center of Conservation Science and Policy, and the University of Oregon. URL: http://www.theresourceinnovationgroup.org/storage/willamette_report3.11FINAL.pdf (accessed 15 Nov 2010).
8. 1. Ellstrand NC,
   2. Elam DR

   1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:217–242.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Feinsinger P,
   2. Murray G,
   3. Kinsman S,
   4. Busby WH

   1986. Floral neighborhood and pollination success in four hummingbird pollinated cloud forest plant species. Ecology 67:449–464.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Heschel MS,
    2. Paige KN

    1995. Inbreeding depression, environmental stress, and population size variation in scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregate). Conservation Biology 9:126–133.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Hiscock SJ,
    2. Tabah DA

    2003. The different mechanisms of sporophytic self-incompatibility. Philosophical Transaction: Biological Sciences 358:1037–1045.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Hufford KM,
    2. Mazer SJ

    2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Husband BC,
    2. Schemske DW

    1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. [ITIS] Integrated Taxonomic Information System

    2011. URL: http://itis.gov (accessed 31 Mar 2011).
15. 1. Jackson SA

    1996. Reproductive aspects of Lomatium bradshawii and Erigeron decumbens of the Willamette Valley, Oregon [MSc Thesis] Eugene (OR): University of Oregon. 97 p.
16. 1. Kagan JS,
    2. Yamamoto S

    1987. Status report for Erigeron decumbens subsp. decumbens. Unpublished report to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
17. 1. Kaye TN

    2006. Vital steps toward success of endangered plant reintroductions. Native Plants Journal 9:313–322.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Kaye TN,
    2. Kuykendall K

    2001. Germination and propagation techniques for restoring rare Pacific Northwest prairie plants. In: Reichard SH, Dunwiddie PW, Gamon JG, Kruckeberg AR, Salstrom DL, editors. Conservation of Washington’s native plants and ecosystems. Seattle (WA): Washington Native Plant Society. p 213–224.
19. 1. Kearns CA,
    2. Inouye DW,
    3. Waser NM

    1998. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:83–112.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Kéry M,
    2. Matthies D,
    3. Spillmann H

    2000. Reduced fecundity and offspring performance in small populations of the declining grassland plants Primula veris and Gentiana lutea. Journal of Ecology 88:17–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Klinkhamer PGL,
    2. de Jong TJ

    1990. Effects of plant size, plant density and sex differential nectar reward on pollinator visitation in the protandrous Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Oikos 57:399–405.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Lennartsson T

    2002. Extinction thresholds in fragmented plant populations: an experimental field study of disrupted plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology 83:3060–3072.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
23. 1. Lesica P,
    2. Allendorf FW

    1999. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: mix or match? Restoration Ecology 7:42–50.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Linhart YB,
    2. Grant MC

    1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:237–277.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Marshall DR,
    2. Brown ADJ

    1973. Stability of performance of mixtures and multilines. Euphytica 22:405–412.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Martins PS,
    2. Jain SK

    1979. Role of genetic variation in the colonizing ability of rose clover (Trifolium hirtum All.). American Naturalist 114:591–595.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Menges ES

    1991. Seed germination percentage increases with population size in a fragmented prairie species. Conservation Biology 5:158–164.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Messinger W

    2005. Personal communication. Eugene (OR): US Army Corps of Engineers, Willamette Valley Projects. Botanist.
29. 1. Meyer SE,
    2. Kitchen SO,
    3. Carlson SL

    1995. Seed germination timing patterns in intermountain Penstemon (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 82:377–389.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Montalvo AM

    1994. Inbreeding depression and maternal effects in Aquilegia caerulea, a partially selfing plant. Ecology 75:2395–2409.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Morgan JW

    1999. Effects of population size on seed production and germinability in an endangered, fragmented grassland plant. Conservation Biology 13:266–273.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Newman D,
    2. Tallmon DA

    2001. Experimental evidence for beneficial fitness effects of gene flow in recently isolated populations. Conservation Biology 15:1054–1063.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Nuckols J

    2005. Personal communication. Eugene (OR): The Nature Conservancy. Willamette Valley Preserve Manager.
34. 1. [ORBIC] Oregon Biodiversity Information Center

    2010. Rare, threatened and endangered species of Oregon. Portland (OR): Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University. 105 p.
35. 1. Paschke M,
    2. Abs C,
    3. Schmid B

    2002. Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 89:1250–1259.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. 1. Sagarin RD,
    2. Gaines SD,
    3. Gaylord B

    2006. Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the ranges of species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:524–530.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Saunders DA,
    2. Hobbs RJ,
    3. Margules CR

    1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5:18–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Thompson J

    2010. Personal communication. Portland (OR): US Fish and Wildlife Service. Fish and Wildlife Biologist.
39. 1. Thorpe AS,
    2. Kaye TN

    2006. Erigeron decumbens ssp. decumbens (Willamette daisy): population monitoring and evaluation of mowing and burning at Oxbow West, West Eugene Wetlands. 2006 Progress Report. Institute for Applied Ecology and Bureau of Land Management, Eugene District, Eugene, Oregon. iii + 22 p.
40. 1. Thorpe AS,
    2. Kaye TN

    2007. Erigeron decumbens ssp. decumbens (Willamette daisy): population monitoring and evaluation of mowing and burning at Oxbow West, West Eugene Wetlands. 2007 Progress Report. Institute for Applied Ecology and Bureau of Land Management, Eugene District, Eugene, Oregon. ii + 26 p.
41. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

    2011. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 31 Mar 2011). Greensboro (NC): National Plant Data Team.
42. 1. [USFWS] US Fish and Wildlife Service

    2010. Recovery plan for the prairie species of western Oregon and southwestern Washington. Portland (OR): US Fish and Wildlife Service. xi + 241 p.
43. 1. Villegas S

    2005. Personal communication. Eugene (OR): USDI Bureau of Land Management, West Eugene Wetlands. Natural Resource Specialist.
44. 1. Ward K,
    2. Gisler M,
    3. Fiegener R,
    4. Young A

    2008. The Willamette Valley seed increase program: developing germplasm using an ecoregional approach. Native Plants Journal 9:334–350.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text