Patterns of adaptation in three native grasses in northern California

REFERENCES

1. 1. Bernardo R.

   2002. Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. Chapter 7: Genotype x environment interaction. p 147–171. Woodbury (MN): Stemma Press. 369 p.
2. 1. Buck JM,
   2. Adams RS,
   3. Cone J,
   4. Conkle MT,
   5. Libby WJ,
   6. Eden CJ,
   7. Knight MJ.

   1970. California tree seed zones. USDA Forest Service and California Region and Forestry. Miscellaneous Publication. 5 p.
3. 1. Clausen J,
   2. Keck DD,
   3. Hisey WM.

   1948. Experimental studies on the nature of species. III. Environmental responses of climatic races of Achillea. Washington (DC): Carnegie Institute. Publication 581. 129 p.
4. 1. Cleland EE,
   2. Chuine I,
   3. Menzel A,
   4. Mooney HA,
   5. Schwartz MD.

   2007. Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:357–365.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Conkle MT.

   1973. Growth data for 29 years from the California elevational transect study of ponderosa pine. Forest Science 19:31–39.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Critchfield WB.

   1971. Profiles of California vegetation. Berkeley (CA): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. Research Paper PSW-76. 54 p.
7. 1. Dodd RS,
   2. Power AB.

   1986. Variation in wood structure of white fir along an elevational transect. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16:303–310.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Erickson VJ,
   2. Mandel NL,
   3. Sorensen FC.

   2004. Landscape patterns of phenotypic variation and population structuring in a selfing grass, Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye). Canadian Journal of Botany 82:1776–1789.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
9. 1. Fites JA,
   2. Olson RD,
   3. Smith S,
   4. Vazquez A,
   5. Bricker D,
   6. Clark R,
   7. Hanson L.

   1996. Vegetative, fire, insect, and pathogen conditions on the Lassen and Plumas National Forests, and the Sierraville Ranger District of the Tahoe National Forest. Unpublished Report. 10 April 1996. Nevada City (CA): USDA Forest Service. 46 p.
10. 1. Fowells HA.

    1941. The period of seasonal growth of ponderosa pine and associated species. Journal of Forestry 39:601–608.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Godt MJ,
    2. Hamrick JL.

    1998. Allozyme diversity in the grasses. In: Cheplick GP, editor. Population biology of grasses. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p 11–29.
12. 1. Harlan JR.

    1945. Cleistogamy and chasmogamy in Bromus carinatus Hook. & Arn. American Journal of Botany 32:66–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Harry DE,
    2. Jenkinson JL,
    3. Kinloch BB.

    1983. Early growth of sugar pine from an elevational transect. Forest Science 29(3):660–669.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Hickman JC

    , editor. 1993. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. 1400 p.
15. 1. Hufford KM,
    2. Mazer SJ.

    2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:147–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Johnson GR,
    2. Sorenson FC,
    3. St Clair JB,
    4. Cronn RC.

    2004. Pacific Northwest forest tree seed zones, a template for native plants? Native Plants Journal 5:131–140.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

    1990. Managing genetic diversity in a tree improvement program. Forest Ecology and Management 35:131–149.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

    2004. Adaptive genetic variation in sugar pine. In: Sniezko R, editor. Breeding and genetic resources of five-needle pines: growth, adaptability, and pest resistance. Proceedings Conference IUFRO Working Party 2.02.15. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. RMRS-P-32. p 103–123.
19. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

    2005a. Provenance trials of ponderosa pine in northern California. Forest Science 51(6):595–607.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

    2005b. Genetic analyses of ponderosa pine, sugar pine, Douglas-fir, and white fir progeny tests in the Sierra Nevada breeding zones. USDA Forest Service. Unpublished reports.
21. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

    2008. Seed zones of California native grasses for the Sierra Nevada bioregion. Oroville (CA): USDA Forest Service. Unpublished report. 36 p.
22. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

    2009. Regional genetic variation in three native grasses in northern California. Native Plants Journal 10(3):263–280.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 1. Kitzmiller JH,
    2. Hanson L,
    3. Switzer H,
    4. Griggs MA.

    1997. Genetic variation among native grasses on the Plumas National Forest. Oroville (CA): USDA Forest Service. Unpublished study plan.
24. 1. Knapp EE,
    2. Rice KJ.

    1996. Genetic structure and gene flow in Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye): implications for native grassland restoration. Restoration Ecology 4:1–10.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Knapp EE,
    2. Rice KJ.

    2008. Effects of competition and life history stage on the expression of local adaptation in two native bunchgrasses. Restoration Ecology 16:12–23.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Knapp EE,
    2. Rice KJ.

    2009. Effects of competition and temporal variation on the evolutionary potential of two native bunchgrass species. Restoration Ecology, doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00552.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. McKay JK,
    2. Latta RG.

    2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:285–291.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. McKay JK,
    2. Christian CE,
    3. Harrison S,
    4. Rice KJ.

    2005. “How local is local?” Practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:432–440.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. [OSU PRISM Group] Oregon State University PRISM Group.

    2006. URL: http://ocs.orst.edu/prism/ (accessed May 2004). Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University.
30. 1. Oswald VH.

    1994. Manual of the vascular plants of Butte County, California. California Native Plant Society. 348 p.
31. 1. Rice KJ,
    2. Emery NC.

    2003. Managing microevolution: restoration in the face of global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9:469–478.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Rice KJ,
    2. Mack RN.

    1991. Ecological genetics of Bromus tectorum III: the demography of reciprocally sown populations. Oecologia 88:91–101.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. SAS Institute.

    1999. Statistical Analysis. Cary (NC): Statistical Analysis Software.
34. 1. Slatkin M.

    1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:393–430.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Templeton AR,
    2. Hemmer H,
    3. Mace G,
    4. Seal US,
    5. Shields WM,
    6. Woodruff DS.

    1986. Local adaptation, coadaptation, and population boundaries. Zoo Biology 5:115–25.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.

    2010. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 11 Nov 2010). Baton Rouge (LA): National Plant Data Center.
37. 1. Wilson BL,
    2. Kitzmiller JH,
    3. Rolle W,
    4. Hipkins VD.

    2001. Isozyme variation and its environmental correlates in Elymus glaucus from the California Floristic Province. Canadian Journal of Botany 79:139–153.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science