Direct seeding is more cost effective than container stock across ten woody species in California

REFERENCES

1. 1. Alvarado-Sosa P,
   2. Blanco-Garcia A,
   3. Lindig-Cisneros R.

   2007. Test of alternative nursery propagation conditions for Lupinus elegans Kunth plants, and effects on field survival. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 30:201–204.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Baker HG.

   1972. Seed weight in relation to environmental conditions in California. Ecology 53:997–1010.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Benayas JMR,
   2. Camacho-Cruz A.

   2004. Performance of Quercus ilex saplings planted in abandoned Mediterranean cropland after long-term interruption of their management. Forest Ecology and Management 194:223–233.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Burkett VR,
   2. Draugelis-Dale RO,
   3. Williams HA,
   4. Schoenholtz SH.

   2005. Effects of flooding regime and seedling treatment on early survival and growth of nuttall oak. Restoration Ecology 13:471–479.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. California Soil Resource Lab.

   2010. Online Soil Survey (DE Beaudette, AT O’Geen). URL: http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/drupal/node/27 (accessed Feb 2010). Davis (CA): University of California Davis.
6. 1. Camargo JLC,
   2. Ferraz IDK,
   3. Imakawa AM.

   2002. Rehabilitation of degraded areas of central Amazonia using direct sowing of forest tree seeds. Restoration Ecology 10:636–644.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Clewell A,
   2. Rieger JP.

   1997. What practitioners need from restoration ecologists. Restoration Ecology 5:350–354.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Doust SJ,
   2. Erskine PD,
   3. Lamb D.

   2006. Direct seeding to restore rainforest species: microsite effects on the early establishment and growth of rainforest tree seedlings on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 234:333–343.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Falk DA,
   2. Palmer MA,
   3. Zedler JB.

   2006. Foundations of restoration ecology. Washington (DC): Island Press.
10. 1. Grubb P.

    1977. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biology Review 52:107–145.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Halter MR,
    2. Chanway CP,
    3. Harper GJ.

    1993. Growth reduction and root deformation of containerized lodgepole pine saplings 11 years after planting. Forest Ecology and Management 56:131–146.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Hickman JC

    , editor. 1993. The Jepson manual—higher plants of California. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
13. 1. Hooper E,
    2. Condit R,
    3. Legendre P.

    2002. Responses of 20 native tree species to reforestation strategies for abandoned farmland in Panama. Ecological Applications 12:1626–1641.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Jefferson LV.

    2004. Implications of plant density on the resulting community structure of mine site land. Restoration Ecology 12:429–438.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Khurana E,
    2. Singh JS.

    2004. Germination and seedling growth of five tree species from tropical dry forest in relation to water stress: impact of seed size. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20:385–396.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Lockhart BR,
    2. Keeland B,
    3. McCoy J,
    4. Dean TJ.

    2003. Comparing regeneration techniques for afforesting previously farmed bottomland hardwood sites in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA. Forestry 76:169–180.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Lulow ME,
    2. Young TP,
    3. Wirka JL,
    4. Anderson JH.

    2007. Variation in the initial success of seeded native bunchgrasses in the rangeland foothills of Yolo County, California. Ecological Restoration 25:20–29.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 1. Martinez-Ruiz C,
    2. Fernandez-Santos B,
    3. Putwai PD,
    4. Fernandez-Gomez MJ.

    2007. Natural and man-induced revegetation on mining wastes: changes in the floristic composition during early succession. Ecological Engineering 30:286–294.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Matthes U,
    2. Gerrath JA,
    3. Larson DW.

    2003. Experimental restoration of disturbed cliff-edge forests in Bruce Peninsula National Park, Ontario, Canada. Restoration Ecology 11:174–184.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Maunder M.

    1992. Plant reintroduction: an overview. Biodiversity and Conservation 1:51–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. McCreary DD.

    1995. Auguring and fertilization stimulate growth of blue oak seedlings planted from acorns but not from containers. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 10:133–137.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. McCreary DD.

    1996. The effects of stock type and radical pruning on blue oak morphology and field performance. Annales des Sciences Forestieres 53:641–648.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Midoko-Iponga D,
    2. Krug CB,
    3. Milton SJ.

    2005. Competition and herbivory influence growth and survival of shrubs on old fields: implications for restoration of renosterveld shrubland. Journal of Vegetation Science 16:685–692.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Ruiz-Jaen MC,
    2. Aide TM.

    2005. Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restoration Ecology 13:569–577.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Sanchez-Gomez D,
    2. Valladares F,
    3. Zavala MA.

    2006. Performance of seedlings of Mediterranean woody species under experimental gradients of irradiance and water availability: trade-offs and evidence for niche differentiation. New Phytologist 170:795–805.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 1. Stanturf JA,
    2. Schoenholtz SH,
    3. Schweitzer C,
    4. Shepard JP.

    2001. Achieving restoration success: myths in bottomland hardwood forests. Restoration Ecology 9:189–200.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Wahlsten D.

    1991. Sample-size to detect a planned contrast and a one degree-of-freedom interaction effect. Psychological Bulletin 110:587–595.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Walmsley CA,
    2. Davy AJ.

    1997. The restoration of coastal shingle vegetation: effects of substrate composition on the establishment of container grown plants. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:154–165.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Welch BL.

    1997. Seeded versus containerized big sagebrush plants for seed-increase gardens. Journal of Range Management 50:611–614.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Young TP,
    2. Evans RY.

    2001. Container stock versus direct seeding for woody species in restoration sites. Combined Proceedings—International Plant Propagators Society (2000) 50:577–582.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Young TP,
    2. Evans RY.

    2005. Initial mortality and root and shoot growth of valley oak seedlings outplanted as seeds and as container stock under different irrigation regimes. Native Plants Journal 6(1): 83–90.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. 1. Young JA,
    2. Young CG.

    1992. Seeds of woody plants in North America. Portland (OR): Dioscorides Press.