Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Native Plants Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Landscape Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Native Plants Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Index/Abstracts
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Call for Papers
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research Article

Direct seeding is more cost effective than container stock across ten woody species in California

Alex P Palmerlee and Truman P Young
Native Plants Journal, June 2010, 11 (2) 89-102; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/NPJ.2010.11.2.89
Alex P Palmerlee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Truman P Young
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The planting of native woody plants is a cornerstone of many habitat restoration projects. Current techniques for revegetating disturbed or reclaimed plant communities often consist primarily of planting trees and shrubs from container stock, which can be costly to buy or produce, time-consuming to plant (an additional cost), and logistically difficult for large-scale restoration projects. We tested whether direct seeding woody species was more cost effective than planting container stock. During fall 2004, we planted 3 sites encompassing the ecotone of foothill riparian and woodland habitats in northern California with 10 native species of woody plants, both as container stock and direct seed. Data on survival were collected over a 2-y period. Across species, the planting success of direct-seeded plants, but not container plants, increased significantly with increasing mean seed size. Although seeds generally had lower individual planting success than did container stock, this was always offset by the higher costs of purchasing and planting container stock. Direct seeding was up to 29 times more cost effective than planting container stock when considering base costs (not including fixed costs of tubes, irrigation, and herbicide). Including these additional costs reduced the cost advantage, but direct seeding remained more cost effective per surviving plant across all species, and especially so for large-seeded species.

  • planting costs
  • restoration
  • native plants
  • seed size
NOMENCLATURE
  • Hickman (1993)

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Native Plants Journal: 11 (2)
Native Plants Journal
Vol. 11, Issue 2
20 Jun 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Native Plants Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Direct seeding is more cost effective than container stock across ten woody species in California
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Native Plants Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Native Plants Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Direct seeding is more cost effective than container stock across ten woody species in California
Alex P Palmerlee, Truman P Young
Native Plants Journal Jun 2010, 11 (2) 89-102; DOI: 10.2979/NPJ.2010.11.2.89

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Direct seeding is more cost effective than container stock across ten woody species in California
Alex P Palmerlee, Truman P Young
Native Plants Journal Jun 2010, 11 (2) 89-102; DOI: 10.2979/NPJ.2010.11.2.89
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Seed Germination for Restoration in a Challenging Species: Case Study with Rare Morro Manzanita
  • Drill-Seeding Blue Oak Acorns: Testing the (Cost-)Effectiveness of a New Restoration Technique across Years and Microsites
  • Techniques to Restore Coastal Scrub at a Reclaimed Quarry in Central California
  • Seed Dormancy Break and Germination for Restoration of Three Globally Important Wetland Bulrushes
  • Cost-effectiveness of Different Revegetation Techniques for Slender Banksia
  • Outplanting but not seeding establishes native desert perennials
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • planting costs
  • restoration
  • native plants
  • seed size
  • Hickman (1993)
UW Press logo

© 2025 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire