Research Article

What are the best seed sources for ecosystem restoration on BLM and USFS lands?

Randy Johnson, Larry Stritch, Peggy Olwell, Scott Lambert, Matthew E Horning and Richard Cronn
Native Plants Journal, June 2010, 11 (2) 117-131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/NPJ.2010.11.2.117

REFERENCES

    1. Angert AL,
    2. Schemske DW.
    2005. The evolution of species’ distributions: reciprocal transplants across the elevation ranges of Mimulus cardinalis and M. lewisii. Evolution 59:1671–1684.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Annese V,
    2. Cazzato E,
    3. Corleto A.
    2006. Quantitative and qualitative traits of natural ecotypes of perennial grasses (Dactylis glomerata L., Festuca arundinacea Schreb., Phalaris tuberosa L., Brachypodium rupestre (Host) R. et S.) collected in Southern Italy. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53:431–441.
    OpenUrl
    1. Antonovics J,
    2. Primack RB.
    1982. Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago. VI: the demography of seedling transplants of P. lanceolata. Journal of Ecology 70:55–75.
    OpenUrl
    1. Aubry C,
    2. Shoal R,
    3. Erickson V.
    2005. Grass cultivars: their origins, development, and use on national forests and grasslands in the Pacific Northwest. Pendleton (OR): USDA Forest Service, Umatilla National Forest. 44 p.
    1. Ayres E,
    2. Steltzer H,
    3. Simmons BL,
    4. Simpson RT,
    5. Steinweg JM,
    6. Wallenstein MD,
    7. Mellor N,
    8. Parton WJ,
    9. Moore JC,
    10. Wall DH.
    2009. Home-field advantage accelerates leaf litter decomposition in forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41:606–610.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Bailey JK,
    2. Schweitzer JA,
    3. Beda F,
    4. Koricheva J,
    5. LeRoy CJ,
    6. Madritch MD,
    7. Rehill BJ,
    8. Bangert RK,
    9. Fischer DG,
    10. Allan GJ,
    11. Whitham TG.
    2009. From genes to ecosystems: a synthesis of the effects of plant genetic factors across levels of organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 364:1607–1616.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Baker LH,
    2. Curnow RN.
    1969. Choice of population size and use of variation between replicate populations in plant selection programs. Crop Science 9:555–560.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Bangert RK,
    2. Lonsdorf EV,
    3. Wimp GM,
    4. Shuster SM,
    5. Fischer D,
    6. Schweitzer JA,
    7. Allan GJ,
    8. Bailey JK,
    9. Whitham TG.
    2008. Genetic structure of a foundation species: scaling community phenotypes from the individual to the region. Heredity 100:121–131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Barbour RC,
    2. Forster LG,
    3. Baker SC,
    4. Steane DA,
    5. Potts BM.
    2009. Biodiversity consequences of genetic variation in bark characteristics within a foundation tree species. Conservation Biology 23:1146–1155.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bennington CC,
    2. McGraw JB.
    1995. Natural selection and ecotypic differentiation in Impatiens pallida. Ecological Monographs 65:303–324.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Bischoff A,
    2. Cremiéux L,
    3. Smilauerov M,
    4. Lawson CS,
    5. Mortimer SR,
    6. Dolezal J,
    7. Lanta V,
    8. Edwards AR,
    9. Brook AJ,
    10. Macel M,
    11. Leps J,
    12. Steinger T,
    13. Müller-Schärer H.
    2006. Detecting local adaptation in widespread grass species—the importance of scale and local plant community. Journal of Ecology 94:1130–1142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Bower A.
    2010. Personal communication. Corvallis (OR): USDA Forest Service, Region 6. Area Geneticist.
    1. Bradshaw AD.
    1960. Population differentiation in Agrostis tenuis Sibth. III. Populations in varied environments. New Phytologist 59:92–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Broadhurst LM,
    2. Lowe A,
    3. Coates DJ,
    4. Cunningham SA,
    5. McDonald M,
    6. Vesk PA,
    7. Yates C.
    2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications 1:587–597.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Burton PJ,
    2. Burton CM.
    2002. Promoting genetic diversity in the production of large quantities of native plant seed. Ecological Restoration 20:117–123.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Byars SG,
    2. Papst W,
    3. Hoffmann AA.
    2007. Local adaptation and cogradient selection in the alpine plant Poa hiemata along a narrow altitudinal gradient. Evolution 61:2925–2941.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Cathey HM.
    1990. USDA plant hardiness zone map. Washington (DC): USDA, US National Arboretum, Agricultural Research Service. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1475.
    1. Charlesworth D,
    2. Charlesworth B.
    1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 18:237–268.
    OpenUrl
    1. Clausen J,
    2. Hiesey WM.
    1958. Experimental studies on the nature of species. IV. Genetic structure of ecological races. Washington (DC): Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 615.
    1. Clausen J,
    2. Keck DD,
    3. Hiesey WM.
    1940. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Washington (DC): Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 520.
    1. Collins S,
    2. Stritch LE.
    2008. Caring for our natural assets: an ecosystem services perspective. In: Deal R, editor. Integrated restoration of forested ecosystems to achieve multiresource benefits. Proceedings of the 2007 National Silviculture Workshop. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. General Technical Report GTR-PNW-733. p 1–11.
    1. Crutsinger GM,
    2. Cadotte MW,
    3. Sanders NJ.
    2009. Plant genetics shapes inquiline community structure across spatial scales. Ecology Letters 12:285–292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Cunningham RA.
    1975. Provisional tree and shrub seed zones for the Great Plains. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-150.
    1. Davy AJ,
    2. Smith H.
    1985. Population differentiation in the life-history characteristics of salt-marsh annuals. Vegetatio 61:117–125.
    OpenUrl
    1. Erickson VJ,
    2. Mandel NL,
    3. Sorensen FC.
    2004. Landscape patterns of phenotypic variation and population structuring in a selfing grass, Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye). Canadian Journal of Botany 82:1776–1789.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Etterson JR.
    2004. Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. I. Clinal patterns of selection along an environmental gradient in the Great Plains. Evolution 58:1446–1458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Frank B.
    1951. Southern pines from different geographic sources show different responses to low temperatures. Journal of Forestry 49:915–916.
    OpenUrl
    1. Franklin IF.
    1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soule ME, Wilcox BA, editors. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. p 135–149.
    1. Franklin R,
    2. Frankham R.
    2006. How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential? Animal Conservation 1:69–70.
    OpenUrl
    1. Galen C,
    2. Shore JS,
    3. Deyoe H.
    1991. Ecotypic divergence in alpine Polemonium viscosum: genetic structure, quantitative variation, and local adaptation. Evolution 45:1218–1228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Galloway LF,
    2. Fenster CB.
    2000. Population differentiation in an annual legume: local adaptation. Evolution 54:1173–1181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gauthier P,
    2. Lumaret R,
    3. Bedecarrats A.
    1998. Ecotype differentiation and coexistence of two parapatric tetraploid subspecies of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) in the Alps. New Phytologist 139:741–750.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Geber MA,
    2. Eckhart VM.
    2005. Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. II. Fitness variation across a subspecies border. Evolution 59:521–531.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Giménez-Benavides L,
    2. Escudero A,
    3. Iriondo JM.
    2007. Local adaptation enhances seedling recruitment along an altitudinal gradient in a high mountain Mediterranean plant. Annals of Botany 99:723–734.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hamann A,
    2. Koshy MP,
    3. Namkoong G,
    4. Ying CC.
    2000. Genotype×environment interactions in Alnus rubra: developing seed zones and seed-transfer guidelines with spatial statistics and GIS. Forest Ecology and Management 136:107–119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hammerli A,
    2. Reush TBH.
    2002. Local adaptation and transplant dominance in genets of the marine clonal plant Zostera marina. Marine Ecology Progress Series 242:111–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hargrove WM,
    2. Hoffman FM.
    2005. Potential of multivariate quantitative methods for delineation and visualization of ecoregions. Environmental Management 34:S39–S60.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Harry DE,
    2. Jenkinson JL,
    3. Kinloch BB.
    1983. Early growth of sugar pine from an elevational transect. Forest Science 29:660–669.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hedderson TA,
    2. Longton RE.
    2008. Local adaptation in moss life histories: population-level variation and a reciprocal transplant experiment. Journal of Bryology 30:1–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hereford J.
    2009. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. American Naturalist 173:579–588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hiesey WM,
    2. Nobs MA.
    1970. Genetic and transplant studies on contrasting species and ecological races of the Achillea millefolium complex. Botanical Gazette 131:245–259.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hooker AL.
    1974. Cytoplasmic susceptibility in plant disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 12:167–179.
    OpenUrl
    1. Horning ME,
    2. McGovern TR,
    3. Darris DC,
    4. Mandel NL,
    5. Johnson R.
    2008. Genecology of Holodiscus discolor (Rosaceae) in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Restoration Ecology 18:235–243.
    OpenUrl
    1. Illingworth K,
    2. Szalkai A.
    1993. Summary. In: Albricht M, editor. British Columbia Interior Tree Improvement Council second progress report 1985–1990. Victoria (BC): British Columbia Ministry of Forests.
    1. Johnson R,
    2. Lipow S.
    2002. Compatibility of breeding for increased wood production and long-term sustainability: the genetic variation of seed orchard seed and associated risks. In: Proceedings from the Wood Compatibility Initiative Workshop 18. p 169–179.
    1. Johnson GR,
    2. Sorensen FC,
    3. St Clair JB,
    4. Cronn RC.
    2004. Pacific Northwest forest tree seed zones—a template for native plants? Native Plants Journal 5:131–140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jones AT,
    2. Hayes MJ,
    3. Hamilton RS.
    2001. The effect of provenance on the performance of Crataegus monogyna in hedges. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:952–962.
    OpenUrl
    1. Jones TA.
    2005. Genetic principles and the use of native seeds—just the FAQs, please, just the FAQs. Native Plants Journal 6:14–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jones TA.
    2009. Conservation biology and plant breeding: special considerations for the development of native plant materials for use in restoration. Ecological Restoration 27:8–11.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Jones TA,
    2. Monaco TA.
    2007. A restoration practitioner’s guide to the restoration gene pool concept. Ecological Restoration 25:12–19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jones TA,
    2. Monaco TA.
    2009. A role for assisted evolution in designing native plant materials for domesticated landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:541–547.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Joshi JB,
    2. Schmid B,
    3. Caldeira MC,
    4. Dimitrakopoulos PG,
    5. Good J,
    6. Harris R,
    7. Hector A,
    8. Huss-Danell K,
    9. Jumpponen A,
    10. Minns A,
    11. Mulder CPH,
    12. Pereira JS,
    13. Prinz A,
    14. Scherer-Lorenzen M,
    15. Siamantziouras SD,
    16. Terry AC,
    17. Troumbis AY,
    18. Lawton JH.
    2001. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecology Letters 4:536–544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Kang H.
    1979. Long-term tree breeding. In: Proceedings of the 15th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference; 1979 Jun 19–21; Macon, GA. Mississippi State University (MS): Eastern Tree Seed Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Tree Improvement Committee Sponsored Publication No. 37. p 66–72.
    1. Kendell CE,
    2. Winn AA,
    3. Miller TE.
    1996. The effects of surrounding vegetation and transplant age on the detection of local adaptation in perennial grass Aristida stricta. Journal of Ecology 84:745–754.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Knapp EE,
    2. Rice KJ.
    1994. Starting from seed: genetic issues in using native grasses for restoration. Restoration and Management Notes 12:40–45.
    OpenUrl
    1. Knapp EE,
    2. Rice KJ.
    1998. Comparison of isozymes and quantitative traits for evaluating patterns of genetic variation in purple needlegrass (Nassella pulchra). Conservation Biology 12:1031–1041.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Knight TM,
    2. Miller TE.
    2004. Local adaptation within a population of Hydrocotyle bonariensis. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6:103–114.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kramer AT,
    2. Havens K.
    2009. Plant conservation genetics in a changing world. Trends in Plant Science 14:599–607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lande R.
    1995. Mutation and conservation. Conservation Biology 9:782–791.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lesica P,
    2. Allendorf FW.
    1999. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: mix or match? Restoration Ecology 7:42–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Linhart YB,
    2. Grant MC.
    1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:237–277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lynch MJ,
    2. Conery J,
    3. Burger R.
    1995. Mutational meltdowns in sexual populations. Evolution 49:1067–1080.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McGraw JB.
    1987. Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes. IV. Fitness response to reciprocal transplanting in ecotypes with differing plasticity. Oecologia 73:465–468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McKay JK,
    2. Bishop JG,
    3. Lin J-Z,
    4. Richards JH,
    5. Sala A,
    6. Mitchell-Olds T.
    2001. Local adaptation across a climatic gradient despite small effective population size in the rare sapphire rockcress. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:1715–1721.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. McKay JK,
    2. Christian CE,
    3. Harrison S,
    4. Rice KJ.
    2005. “How local is local?” A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:432–440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McMahon G,
    2. Gregonis SM,
    3. Waltman SW,
    4. Omernik JM,
    5. Thorson TD,
    6. Freeouf JA,
    7. Rorick AH,
    8. Keys JE.
    2001. Developing a spatial framework of common ecological regions for the conterminous US. Environmental Management 28:293–316.
    OpenUrlGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
    2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington (DC): Island Press. 137 p. URL: http://www.millenniumassessment.org (accessed 14 Apr 2010).
    1. Miller RE,
    2. Fowler NL.
    1994. Life history variation and local adaptation within two populations of Bouteloua rigidiseta (Texas Grama). Journal of Ecology 82:855–864.
    OpenUrl
    1. Montalvo AM,
    2. Ellstrand NC.
    2000. Transplantation of the subshrub Lotus scoparius: testing the home-site advantage hypothesis. Conservation Biology 14:1034–1045.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Mylecraine KA,
    2. Kuser JE,
    3. Zimmermann GL,
    4. Smouse PE.
    2005. Rangewide provenance variation in Atlantic white-cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides): early survival and growth in New Jersey and North Carolina plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 216:91–104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Nagy ES,
    2. Rice KJ.
    1997. Local adaptation in two subspecies of an annual plant: implications for migration and gene flow. Evolution 51:1079–1089.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. O’Brien EK,
    2. Krauss SL.
    2008. Testing the home-site advantage in forest trees on disturbed and undisturbed sites. Restoration Ecology. Published online: doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00453.x.
    1. Omernik JM.
    1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
    1. Petersen JL,
    2. Ueckert DN.
    2005. Fourwing saltbush seed yield and quality: irrigation, fertilization, and ecotype effects. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58:299–307.
    OpenUrl
    1. Potvin C.
    1986. Biomass allocation and phenological differences among southern and northern populations of the C4 grass Echinochloa crus-galli. Journal of Ecology 74(4):915–923.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Randall WK.
    1996. Forest tree seed zones for western Oregon. Salem (OR): Oregon Department of Forestry.
    1. Randall WK,
    2. Berrang P.
    2002. Washington tree seed transfer zones. Olympia (WA): Washington Department of Natural Resources.
    1. Rehfeldt GE.
    1987. Adaptive variation and seed transfer for ponderosa pine in central Idaho. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Research Note INT-373.
    1. Rehfeldt GE.
    1994. Evolutionary genetics, the biological species, and the ecology of interior cedar-hemlock forests. In: Proceedings of interior cedar-hemlock-white pine forests: ecology and management. Pullman (WA): Washington State University. p 91–100.
    1. Rice KJ,
    2. Emery NC.
    2003. Managing microevolution: restoration in the face of global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:469–478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Rice KJ,
    2. Knapp EE.
    2008. Effects of competition and life history stage on the expression of local adaptation in two native bunchgrasses. Restoration Ecology 16:12–23.
    OpenUrl
    1. Riebesell JF.
    1981. Photosynthetic adaptations in bog and alpine populations of Ledum groenlandicum. Ecology 62:579–586.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rogers DL,
    2. Montalvo AM.
    2004. Genetically appropriate choices for plant materials to maintain biological diversity. Berkeley (CA): University of California. Report to the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Lakewood, Colorado. URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/publications/botany/plantgenetics.pdf (accessed 14 Apr 2010).
    1. Rukavina H,
    2. Hughes H,
    3. Johnson R.
    2008. Variation in saltgrass growth and time of fall dormancy related to geographical and climatic factors. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 133:127–132.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sambatti JBM,
    2. Rice KJ.
    2006. Local adaptation, patterns of selection, and gene flow in the Californian serpentine sunflower (Helianthus exilis). Evolution 60:696–710.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Schmidtling RC.
    2001. Southern pine seed sources. Asheville (NC): USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station. General Technical Report GTR-SRS-44.
    1. Schmitt J,
    2. Gamble SE.
    1990. The effect of distance from the parental site on offspring performance and inbreeding depression in Impatiens capensis: a test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Evolution 44:2022–2030.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Schweitzer JA,
    2. Bailey JK,
    3. Fischer DG,
    4. LeRoy CJ,
    5. Lonsdorf EV,
    6. Whitham TG,
    7. Hart SC.
    2008. Plant–soil–microorganism interactions: heritable relationship between plant genotype and associated soil microorganisms. Ecology 89:773–781.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Shaver GR,
    2. Fetcher N,
    3. Chapin FS.
    1986. Growth and flowering in Eriophorum vaginatum: annual and latitudinal variation. Ecology 67:1524–1535.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Sork VL,
    2. Stowe KA,
    3. Hochwender C.
    1993. Evidence for local adaptation in closely adjacent subpopulations of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) expressed as resistance to herbivores. American Naturalist 142:359–367.
    OpenUrl
    1. Squillace AE,
    2. Silen RR.
    1962. Racial variation in ponderosa pine. Forest Science, Monograph 2.
    1. St Clair JB,
    2. Mandel NL,
    3. Vance-Borland KW.
    2005. Genecology of Douglas fir in western Oregon and Washington. Annals of Botany 96:1199–1214.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
    2010. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 14 Apr 2010). Baton Rouge (LA): National Plant Data Center.
    1. Vogel KP,
    2. Schmer MR,
    3. Mitchell RB.
    2005. Plant adaptation regions: ecological and climatic classification of plant materials. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58:315–319.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wakely P.
    1944. Geographic sources of loblolly pine. Journal of Forestry 42:23–32.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wang H,
    2. McArthur ED,
    3. Sanderson SC,
    4. Graham JH,
    5. Freeman DC.
    1997. Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). IV. Reciprocal transplant experiments. Evolution 51:95–102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Wang XY,
    2. Redmann RE.
    1996. Adaptation to salinity in Hordeum jubatum L. populations studied using reciprocal transplants. Vegetatio 123:65–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Ward K,
    2. Gisler M,
    3. Fiegener R,
    4. Young A.
    2008. The Willamette Valley Seed Increase Program: developing genetically diverse germplasm using an ecoregion approach. Native Plants Journal 9:335–350.
    OpenUrl
    1. Waser NM,
    2. Price MV.
    1985. Reciprocal transplant experiments with Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): evidence for local adaptation. American Journal of Botany 72:1726–1732.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Whitham TG,
    2. Bailey JK,
    3. Schweitzer JA,
    4. Shuster SM,
    5. Bangert RK,
    6. LeRoy CJ,
    7. Lonsdorf EV,
    8. Allan GJ,
    9. DiFazio SP,
    10. Potts BM,
    11. Fischer DG,
    12. Gehring CA,
    13. Lindroth RL,
    14. Marks JC,
    15. Hart SC,
    16. Wimp GM,
    17. Wooley SC.
    2006. A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics 7:510–523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wilson BL,
    2. Darris DC,
    3. Fiegener R,
    4. Johnson R,
    5. Horning ME,
    6. Kuykendall K.
    2008. Seed transfer zones for a native grass (Festuca roemeri): genecological evidence. Native Plants Journal 9:287–302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wimp GM,
    2. Martinsen GD,
    3. Floate KD,
    4. Bangert RK,
    5. Whitham TG.
    2005. Plant genetic determinants of arthropod community structure and diversity. Evolution 59:61–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Withrow-Robinson B,
    2. Johnson R.
    2006. Selecting native plant materials for restoration projects: insuring local adaptation and maintaining genetic diversity. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University Extension. Publication EM8885-e.
    1. Wright JW.
    2007. Local adaptation to serpentine soils in Pinus ponderosa. Plant and Soil 293:209–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Wright JW,
    2. Stanton ML,
    3. Scherson R.
    2006. Local adaptation to serpentine and non-serpentine soils in Collinsia sparsiflora. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8:1–21.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Wu HX,
    2. Ying CC.
    2004. Geographic pattern of local optimality in natural populations of lodgepole pine. Forest Ecology and Management 194:177–198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Wyatt R.
    1986. Ecology and evolution of self-pollination in Arenaria aniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Journal of Ecology 74:403–418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Xie C-Y,
    2. Ying CC.
    1993. Geographic variation of grand fir (Abies grandis) in the Pacific coast region. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:1065–1072.
    OpenUrl
    1. Xie C-Y,
    2. Ying CC.
    1995. Genetic architecture and adaptive landscape of interior lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) in Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25:2010–2021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Ying CC,
    2. Hunt RS.
    1987. Stability of resistance among Pinus contorta provenances to Lophodermella concolor needle cast. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17:1596–1601.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ying CC,
    2. Liang Q.
    1994. Geographic pattern of adaptive variation of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) with the species’ coastal range: field performance at age 20 years. Forest Ecology and Management 67:281–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Ying CC,
    2. Yanchuck AD.
    2006. The development of British Columbia’s tree seed transfer guidelines: purpose, concept, methodology, and implementation. Forest Ecology and Management 227:1–13.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
What are the best seed sources for ecosystem restoration on BLM and USFS lands?
Randy Johnson, Larry Stritch, Peggy Olwell, Scott Lambert, Matthew E Horning, Richard Cronn
Native Plants Journal Jun 2010, 11 (2) 117-131; DOI: 10.2979/NPJ.2010.11.2.117
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords