Regional genetic variation in three native grasses in northern California

References

1. 1. Fites JA,
   2. Olson RD,
   3. Smith S,
   4. Vazquez A,
   5. Bricker D,
   6. Clark R,
   7. Hanson L.

   1996. Vegetative, fire, insect, and pathogen conditions on the Lassen and Plumas National Forests, and the Sierraville Ranger District of the Tahoe National Forest. Unpublished report, 10 April. USDA Forest Service. 46 p.
2. 1. Hickman JC

   , editor. 1993. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. 1242 p.
3. 1. Johnson GR,
   2. Sorenson FC,
   3. St Clair JB,
   4. Cronn RC.

   2004. Pacific Northwest forest tree seed zones, a template for native plants? Native Plants Journal 5:131–140.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

   1990. Managing genetic diversity in a tree improvement program. Forest Ecology and Management 35:131–149.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

   1996. Common garden nursery test for native grasses: Elymus glaucus and Bromus orcuttianus from two west-side Sierra Nevada elevation transects on the Plumas National Forest. Unpublished report. 16 p.
6. 1. Kitzmiller JH.

   2007. Regional genetic variation in three native grasses in reciprocal-transplant field trials in northern California. Unpublished report. 23 p.
7. 1. Kitzmiller JH,
   2. Hanson L,
   3. Switzer H,
   4. Griggs MA.

   1997. Genetic variation among native grasses on the Plumas National Forest. Unpublished study plan. USDA Forest Service.
8. 1. Knapp EE,
   2. Rice KJ.

   1996. Genetic structure and gene flow in Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye): implications for native grassland restoration. Restoration Ecology 4:1–10.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. McKay JK,
   2. Christian CE,
   3. Harrison S,
   4. Rice KJ.

   2005. “How local is local?”—a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:432–440.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project.

    1996. Final report to Congress. Vol. 1. Assessment summaries and management strategies. Davis (CA): University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources.
11. 1. Templeton AR,
    2. Hemmer H,
    3. Mace G,
    4. Seal US,
    5. Shields WM,
    6. Woodruff DS.

    1986. Local adaptation, coadaptation, and population boundaries. Zoo Biology 5:115–125.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. [USDA NRCS] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.

    2004, 2007, 2009. The PLANTS database. URL: http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 11 Jan 2007). Baton Rouge (LA): National Plant Data Center.
13. 1. Westfall RD,
    2. Conkle MT.

    1992. Allozyme markers in breeding zone designation. In: Adams WT and others, editors. Population genetics of forest trees. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 279–309.